Two-year outcomes of anterior versus posterior scleral application of mitomycin C-soaked sponge in trabeculectomy.

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Japanese Journal of Ophthalmology Pub Date : 2024-03-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-05 DOI:10.1007/s10384-023-01043-1
Kun Hu, Fengbin Lin, Yunhe Song, Yingzhe Zhang, Ling Jin, Mengyin Liang, Robert N Weinreb, Xiulan Zhang
{"title":"Two-year outcomes of anterior versus posterior scleral application of mitomycin C-soaked sponge in trabeculectomy.","authors":"Kun Hu, Fengbin Lin, Yunhe Song, Yingzhe Zhang, Ling Jin, Mengyin Liang, Robert N Weinreb, Xiulan Zhang","doi":"10.1007/s10384-023-01043-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare the safety and efficacy of two different application methods of mitomycin C (MMC)-soaked sponge in trabeculectomy.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We included 71 eyes of 71 patients that had undergone trabeculectomy. In the anterior scleral application group, 36 eyes were treated using the long side of the MMC-soaked sponge placed parallel to the limbus. The efficacy and safety in these eyes were compared with eyes treated with the posterior scleral application group, consisting of 35 eyes treated with the long side of the MMC-soaked sponge placed perpendicular to the limbus. The follow-up period was 2 years. The safety of the procedure, including bleb morphology and complications, was the primary outcome, while the success rate was the secondary outcome.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The cumulative success rate at 2 years postoperatively was 94.4% in the anterior and and 94.3% in the posterior scleral application group (P = 1.000). However, with the posterior scleral application of the MMC-soaked sponge, blebs were more low-lying (P = 0.048), less in extent (P < 0.001), more normally vascularized (P = 0.027) and more posteriorly directed (P < 0.001). Furthermore, the incidence of thin-walled cystic bleb (P = 0.028) and bleb leakage (P = 0.025) was significantly lower in the posterior scleral application group than in the anterior group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although there were similar success rates, the posterior scleral application of MMC-soaked sponge with trabeculectomy was safer with a better bleb morphology than the anterior scleral application.</p>","PeriodicalId":14563,"journal":{"name":"Japanese Journal of Ophthalmology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Japanese Journal of Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10384-023-01043-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To compare the safety and efficacy of two different application methods of mitomycin C (MMC)-soaked sponge in trabeculectomy.

Study design: Retrospective study.

Methods: We included 71 eyes of 71 patients that had undergone trabeculectomy. In the anterior scleral application group, 36 eyes were treated using the long side of the MMC-soaked sponge placed parallel to the limbus. The efficacy and safety in these eyes were compared with eyes treated with the posterior scleral application group, consisting of 35 eyes treated with the long side of the MMC-soaked sponge placed perpendicular to the limbus. The follow-up period was 2 years. The safety of the procedure, including bleb morphology and complications, was the primary outcome, while the success rate was the secondary outcome.

Results: The cumulative success rate at 2 years postoperatively was 94.4% in the anterior and and 94.3% in the posterior scleral application group (P = 1.000). However, with the posterior scleral application of the MMC-soaked sponge, blebs were more low-lying (P = 0.048), less in extent (P < 0.001), more normally vascularized (P = 0.027) and more posteriorly directed (P < 0.001). Furthermore, the incidence of thin-walled cystic bleb (P = 0.028) and bleb leakage (P = 0.025) was significantly lower in the posterior scleral application group than in the anterior group.

Conclusion: Although there were similar success rates, the posterior scleral application of MMC-soaked sponge with trabeculectomy was safer with a better bleb morphology than the anterior scleral application.

Abstract Image

在小梁切除术中使用丝裂霉素 C浸泡海绵的前部巩膜与后部巩膜的两年疗效对比。
目的:比较丝裂霉素 C(MMC)浸泡海绵在小梁切除术中两种不同应用方法的安全性和有效性:研究设计:回顾性研究:我们纳入了 71 名接受小梁切除术的患者的 71 只眼睛。在前巩膜应用组中,有 36 只眼睛使用与角膜缘平行放置的 MMC 浸泡海绵的长边进行治疗。这些眼睛的疗效和安全性与后部巩膜应用组的眼睛进行了比较,后部巩膜应用组有 35 只眼睛,使用与角膜缘垂直的长边 MMC 浸泡海绵进行治疗。随访期为两年。手术的安全性(包括眼泡形态和并发症)是主要结果,成功率是次要结果:结果:术后 2 年的累积成功率,前路巩膜应用组为 94.4%,后路巩膜应用组为 94.3%(P = 1.000)。然而,在巩膜后方应用 MMC 浸泡海绵时,出血点更低 (P = 0.048)、范围更小(P < 0.001)、血管更正常(P = 0.027)、方向更靠后(P < 0.001)。此外,薄壁囊性眼泡(P = 0.028)和眼泡渗漏(P = 0.025)的发生率在巩膜后方应用组明显低于前方应用组:结论:虽然成功率相似,但与小梁切除术相比,巩膜后方应用 MMC 浸泡海绵的安全性更高,出血窦形态更好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
8.30%
发文量
65
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Japanese Journal of Ophthalmology (JJO) was inaugurated in 1957 as a quarterly journal published in English by the Ophthalmology Department of the University of Tokyo, with the aim of disseminating the achievements of Japanese ophthalmologists worldwide. JJO remains the only Japanese ophthalmology journal published in English. In 1997, the Japanese Ophthalmological Society assumed the responsibility for publishing the Japanese Journal of Ophthalmology as its official English-language publication. Currently the journal is published bimonthly and accepts papers from authors worldwide. JJO has become an international interdisciplinary forum for the publication of basic science and clinical research papers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信