“Win-win”: Dual-path influence of workplace spirituality on work-family enrichment

IF 4.9 2区 管理学 Q1 MANAGEMENT
Yuanyuan Liu, Zhuxin Si, Yiwen Shi, Bin Li, Pingqing Liu, Shuzhen Liu, Qiong Sun
{"title":"“Win-win”: Dual-path influence of workplace spirituality on work-family enrichment","authors":"Yuanyuan Liu,&nbsp;Zhuxin Si,&nbsp;Yiwen Shi,&nbsp;Bin Li,&nbsp;Pingqing Liu,&nbsp;Shuzhen Liu,&nbsp;Qiong Sun","doi":"10.1111/joop.12495","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In the era of rapid development in the mobile internet economy, mobile intelligent office equipment has exhibited an unprecedented level of “vitality.” The boundaries between work and family are becoming increasingly blurred, fostering the exchange of resources between employees' work role and family role. Workplace spirituality refers to meaningful work, sense of community, and alignment with the organization that individuals develop in their work, which has been demonstrated to have positive impact on work output. It is a question whether workplace spirituality can be spilled over from employees' work role to their family role to improve the performance of the latter and to realize the win-win results for both roles. Based on work–home resources model and work–family enrichment dual-path model, this research uses multi-country data to examine how workplace spirituality influence work–family enrichment through affective rumination (affective path) and problem-solving pondering (instrumental path). Additionally, work–family segmentation preference is introduced as a moderating variable to identify the boundary conditions between workplace spirituality and work-related rumination. Research findings show that workplace spirituality can positively predict work–family enrichment; affective rumination and problem-solving pondering play a partially mediating role in the correlation between workplace spirituality and work–family enrichment. A strong work–family segmentation preference could diminish the positive impact of workplace spirituality on problem-solving pondering and could also weaken the mediating role of problem-solving pondering between workplace spirituality and work–family enrichment at the same time. This study reveals the strategies to enhance work–family enrichment from a spiritual perspective, thereby promoting a win-win situation for both work and family.</p>","PeriodicalId":48330,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology","volume":"97 3","pages":"841-863"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/joop.12495","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the era of rapid development in the mobile internet economy, mobile intelligent office equipment has exhibited an unprecedented level of “vitality.” The boundaries between work and family are becoming increasingly blurred, fostering the exchange of resources between employees' work role and family role. Workplace spirituality refers to meaningful work, sense of community, and alignment with the organization that individuals develop in their work, which has been demonstrated to have positive impact on work output. It is a question whether workplace spirituality can be spilled over from employees' work role to their family role to improve the performance of the latter and to realize the win-win results for both roles. Based on work–home resources model and work–family enrichment dual-path model, this research uses multi-country data to examine how workplace spirituality influence work–family enrichment through affective rumination (affective path) and problem-solving pondering (instrumental path). Additionally, work–family segmentation preference is introduced as a moderating variable to identify the boundary conditions between workplace spirituality and work-related rumination. Research findings show that workplace spirituality can positively predict work–family enrichment; affective rumination and problem-solving pondering play a partially mediating role in the correlation between workplace spirituality and work–family enrichment. A strong work–family segmentation preference could diminish the positive impact of workplace spirituality on problem-solving pondering and could also weaken the mediating role of problem-solving pondering between workplace spirituality and work–family enrichment at the same time. This study reveals the strategies to enhance work–family enrichment from a spiritual perspective, thereby promoting a win-win situation for both work and family.

"双赢":工作场所精神信仰对丰富工作和家庭生活的双重影响
在移动互联网经济飞速发展的时代,移动智能办公设备展现出了前所未有的 "生命力"。工作与家庭的界限越来越模糊,促进了员工工作角色与家庭角色之间的资源交换。职场精神是指个人在工作中形成的有意义的工作、社区感和与组织的一致性,这已被证明会对工作产出产生积极影响。职场灵性能否从员工的工作角色溢出到家庭角色,从而提高后者的绩效,实现两种角色的双赢,这是一个问题。本研究基于工作-家庭资源模型和工作-家庭充实双路径模型,利用多国数据研究职场灵性如何通过情感反刍(情感路径)和问题解决思考(工具路径)影响工作-家庭充实。此外,还引入了工作-家庭分割偏好作为调节变量,以确定职场灵修与工作相关反刍之间的边界条件。研究结果表明,职场灵性能积极预测工作-家庭丰富性;情感反刍和问题解决思考在职场灵性与工作-家庭丰富性之间的相关性中起着部分中介作用。强烈的工作-家庭分割偏好会削弱职场灵性对问题解决思考的积极影响,同时也会削弱问题解决思考在职场灵性和工作-家庭丰富性之间的中介作用。本研究揭示了从灵性角度增强工作-家庭丰富性的策略,从而促进工作与家庭的双赢。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
4.80%
发文量
38
期刊介绍: The Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology aims to increase understanding of people and organisations at work including: - industrial, organizational, work, vocational and personnel psychology - behavioural and cognitive aspects of industrial relations - ergonomics and human factors Innovative or interdisciplinary approaches with a psychological emphasis are particularly welcome. So are papers which develop the links between occupational/organisational psychology and other areas of the discipline, such as social and cognitive psychology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信