{"title":"Referential choice in the narrative discourse of people with aphasia","authors":"Sara Košutar , Marija Jozipović , Gordana Hržica","doi":"10.1016/j.lingua.2024.103676","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Narration requires the appropriate use of reference, which can be particularly challenging in stories with many characters of the same gender, especially for people with language disorders. This study investigates referential choice in the narrative discourse of people with aphasia (PwA) and typical speakers (TS) by observing reference in general and depending on the potential ambiguity of the situation (characters of the same or different gender) and referential functions (introduction, maintenance, and reintroduction of characters). We found no group differences in the number of nouns and pronouns produced. However, PwA showed an overall tendency toward a higher pronoun-to-noun ratio in both situations with characters of the same or different gender. Both groups had a lower pronoun-to-noun ratio when introducing characters and a higher pronoun-to-noun ratio when maintaining characters, with TS having an even higher pronoun-to-noun ratio when referring to characters of different genders. Nevertheless, when reintroducing characters of the same gender, PwA had a higher pronoun-to-noun ratio, which led to ambiguous reference. These findings contribute to the limited research on referential choice in PwA, suggesting that PwA are sensitive to the characteristics of discourse but have a limited ability to consider listeners’ knowledge.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47955,"journal":{"name":"Lingua","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lingua","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0024384124000056","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Narration requires the appropriate use of reference, which can be particularly challenging in stories with many characters of the same gender, especially for people with language disorders. This study investigates referential choice in the narrative discourse of people with aphasia (PwA) and typical speakers (TS) by observing reference in general and depending on the potential ambiguity of the situation (characters of the same or different gender) and referential functions (introduction, maintenance, and reintroduction of characters). We found no group differences in the number of nouns and pronouns produced. However, PwA showed an overall tendency toward a higher pronoun-to-noun ratio in both situations with characters of the same or different gender. Both groups had a lower pronoun-to-noun ratio when introducing characters and a higher pronoun-to-noun ratio when maintaining characters, with TS having an even higher pronoun-to-noun ratio when referring to characters of different genders. Nevertheless, when reintroducing characters of the same gender, PwA had a higher pronoun-to-noun ratio, which led to ambiguous reference. These findings contribute to the limited research on referential choice in PwA, suggesting that PwA are sensitive to the characteristics of discourse but have a limited ability to consider listeners’ knowledge.
期刊介绍:
Lingua publishes papers of any length, if justified, as well as review articles surveying developments in the various fields of linguistics, and occasional discussions. A considerable number of pages in each issue are devoted to critical book reviews. Lingua also publishes Lingua Franca articles consisting of provocative exchanges expressing strong opinions on central topics in linguistics; The Decade In articles which are educational articles offering the nonspecialist linguist an overview of a given area of study; and Taking up the Gauntlet special issues composed of a set number of papers examining one set of data and exploring whose theory offers the most insight with a minimal set of assumptions and a maximum of arguments.