Rubber ramp and spat rope did not facilitate upstream passage of a galaxiid through a perched culvert

IF 1.8 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 FISHERIES
C. F. Baker, P. Williams, N. Pyper, P. A. Franklin
{"title":"Rubber ramp and spat rope did not facilitate upstream passage of a galaxiid through a perched culvert","authors":"C. F. Baker, P. Williams, N. Pyper, P. A. Franklin","doi":"10.1071/mf23207","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Poorly installed or undersized culverts at road crossings are one of the most frequently encountered barriers to fish movements, especially for small-bodied fish species. Although replacement with more ‘fish friendly’ culvert designs is the preferred solution, at many sites remediation will be required in the short to medium term. Consequently, there is a need for effective evidence-based fish passage solutions that can be deployed at scale. This study examined the passage efficiency of juvenile īnanga (<i>Galaxias maculatus</i>) past a perched culvert fitted with spat ropes and a flexible rubber ramp. Only four fish (0.79%) successfully passed the ramp, and no fish successfully passed the whole culvert by the conclusion of the trial. Deployment of flexible rubber ramps to remediate fish passage at perched culverts has recently become common practice in several regions of New Zealand, despite the absence of any evidence base to support their use. This study provides a strong preliminary indication that flexible rubber ramps are an ineffective fish passage solution for remediating perched culverts for non-climbing fishes. To overcome low head-migration barriers, there are alternative evidence-based fish ramp designs, which practitioners can have considerably greater confidence in for achieving restoration goals.</p>","PeriodicalId":18209,"journal":{"name":"Marine and Freshwater Research","volume":"14 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Marine and Freshwater Research","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1071/mf23207","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FISHERIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Poorly installed or undersized culverts at road crossings are one of the most frequently encountered barriers to fish movements, especially for small-bodied fish species. Although replacement with more ‘fish friendly’ culvert designs is the preferred solution, at many sites remediation will be required in the short to medium term. Consequently, there is a need for effective evidence-based fish passage solutions that can be deployed at scale. This study examined the passage efficiency of juvenile īnanga (Galaxias maculatus) past a perched culvert fitted with spat ropes and a flexible rubber ramp. Only four fish (0.79%) successfully passed the ramp, and no fish successfully passed the whole culvert by the conclusion of the trial. Deployment of flexible rubber ramps to remediate fish passage at perched culverts has recently become common practice in several regions of New Zealand, despite the absence of any evidence base to support their use. This study provides a strong preliminary indication that flexible rubber ramps are an ineffective fish passage solution for remediating perched culverts for non-climbing fishes. To overcome low head-migration barriers, there are alternative evidence-based fish ramp designs, which practitioners can have considerably greater confidence in for achieving restoration goals.

橡胶斜坡和吐丝绳不利于银河鱼逆流而上通过栖息的暗渠
道路交叉口的暗渠安装不当或尺寸过小,是最常遇到的鱼类活动障碍之一,尤其是对小体型鱼类而言。虽然更换为更 "适合鱼类 "的暗渠设计是首选的解决方案,但在许多地方,中短期内都需要进行补救。因此,需要以证据为基础、可大规模部署的有效鱼类通道解决方案。本研究考察了幼鱼(Galaxias maculatus)通过装有绳索和弹性橡胶斜坡的栖息暗渠的效率。只有四条鱼(0.79%)成功通过了斜坡,试验结束时没有一条鱼成功通过整个暗渠。尽管没有任何证据支持使用柔性橡胶斜坡来补救栖息暗渠的鱼类通道,但这种做法最近在新西兰的一些地区已成为普遍做法。这项研究提供了一个有力的初步证据,表明柔性橡胶斜坡是一种无效的鱼类通道解决方案,无法为非攀爬性鱼类修复栖息暗渠。要克服低水头洄游障碍,有其他基于实证的鱼类斜坡设计方案,从业者可以更有信心地实现修复目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Marine and Freshwater Research
Marine and Freshwater Research 环境科学-海洋学
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
5.60%
发文量
76
审稿时长
3.8 months
期刊介绍: Marine and Freshwater Research is an international and interdisciplinary journal publishing contributions on all aquatic environments. The journal’s content addresses broad conceptual questions and investigations about the ecology and management of aquatic environments. Environments range from groundwaters, wetlands and streams to estuaries, rocky shores, reefs and the open ocean. Subject areas include, but are not limited to: aquatic ecosystem processes, such as nutrient cycling; biology; ecology; biogeochemistry; biogeography and phylogeography; hydrology; limnology; oceanography; toxicology; conservation and management; and ecosystem services. Contributions that are interdisciplinary and of wide interest and consider the social-ecological and institutional issues associated with managing marine and freshwater ecosystems are welcomed. Marine and Freshwater Research is a valuable resource for researchers in industry and academia, resource managers, environmental consultants, students and amateurs who are interested in any aspect of the aquatic sciences. Marine and Freshwater Research is published with the endorsement of the Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO) and the Australian Academy of Science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信