Exploring the nexus: Comparing and aligning Planetary Health, One Health, and EcoHealth

Q1 Social Sciences
Byomkesh Talukder , Nilanjana Ganguli , Eunice Choi , Mohammadali Tofighi , Gary W. vanloon , James Orbinski
{"title":"Exploring the nexus: Comparing and aligning Planetary Health, One Health, and EcoHealth","authors":"Byomkesh Talukder ,&nbsp;Nilanjana Ganguli ,&nbsp;Eunice Choi ,&nbsp;Mohammadali Tofighi ,&nbsp;Gary W. vanloon ,&nbsp;James Orbinski","doi":"10.1016/j.glt.2023.12.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The interconnectedness between humans and ecosystems highlights the need to protect ecosystems for the well-being of humans and the environment. This has led to the emergence of holistic and interdisciplinary concepts like Planetary Health, One Health, and EcoHealth. There is a growing interest in the differences and implementation of these concepts, including their founders, fundamental questions answered, focus, global distribution of studies, and alignment. This study addresses these issues to facilitate coordinated health interventions for people and ecosystems. Using electronic databases (Web of Science, PubMed, and ProQuest) and conducting a systematic literature review using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA), this paper compares the concepts of Planetary Health, One Health, and EcoHealth, providing a comprehensive overview of the findings and insights by examining each field's advocacy, conceptual application, and implementation levels and exploring the contributions of influential individuals and organizations. The results highlight each concept's global relation to applicability, challenges, and opportunities for further advancement. The study concludes by emphasizing the shared goals and interconnections among these fields in addressing complex health issues at the nexus of human health, environmental health, and ecosystem well-being.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":33615,"journal":{"name":"Global Transitions","volume":"6 ","pages":"Pages 66-75"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589791823000397/pdfft?md5=88552d360b7777fa38ba74e6aa8b4e9b&pid=1-s2.0-S2589791823000397-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Transitions","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589791823000397","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The interconnectedness between humans and ecosystems highlights the need to protect ecosystems for the well-being of humans and the environment. This has led to the emergence of holistic and interdisciplinary concepts like Planetary Health, One Health, and EcoHealth. There is a growing interest in the differences and implementation of these concepts, including their founders, fundamental questions answered, focus, global distribution of studies, and alignment. This study addresses these issues to facilitate coordinated health interventions for people and ecosystems. Using electronic databases (Web of Science, PubMed, and ProQuest) and conducting a systematic literature review using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA), this paper compares the concepts of Planetary Health, One Health, and EcoHealth, providing a comprehensive overview of the findings and insights by examining each field's advocacy, conceptual application, and implementation levels and exploring the contributions of influential individuals and organizations. The results highlight each concept's global relation to applicability, challenges, and opportunities for further advancement. The study concludes by emphasizing the shared goals and interconnections among these fields in addressing complex health issues at the nexus of human health, environmental health, and ecosystem well-being.

探索联系:比较并协调 "行星健康"、"一体健康 "和 "生态健康 "之间的关系
人类与生态系统之间的相互联系凸显了为人类和环境的福祉保护生态系统的必要性。因此,出现了 "行星健康"、"一体健康 "和 "生态健康 "等整体性和跨学科的概念。人们对这些概念的差异和实施越来越感兴趣,包括其创始人、所回答的基本问题、重点、研究的全球分布和一致性。本研究探讨了这些问题,以促进对人类和生态系统采取协调的健康干预措施。本文利用电子数据库(Web of Science、PubMed 和 ProQuest),并采用系统综述和元分析首选报告项目 (PRISMA) 进行了系统的文献综述,比较了 "行星健康"、"一体健康 "和 "生态健康 "的概念,通过考察每个领域的宣传、概念应用和实施水平,以及探索有影响力的个人和组织的贡献,全面概述了研究结果和见解。研究结果强调了每个概念的全球适用性、挑战和进一步发展的机遇。研究最后强调了这些领域在解决人类健康、环境健康和生态系统福祉之间的复杂健康问题方面的共同目标和相互联系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Global Transitions
Global Transitions Social Sciences-Development
CiteScore
18.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信