Impact of COVID-19 on the clinical staging of breast cancer: A cross-sectional study

IF 2 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Thais Zilles Fritsch , Gabriel Ben Bordinhão , Laura Martin Manfroi , Rafaela Vidal Paiva de Sousa , Maiara Rosa dos Santos , Giovana Diniz de Oliveira Bonetti , Rafael José Vargas Alves , Claudia Giuliano Bica
{"title":"Impact of COVID-19 on the clinical staging of breast cancer: A cross-sectional study","authors":"Thais Zilles Fritsch ,&nbsp;Gabriel Ben Bordinhão ,&nbsp;Laura Martin Manfroi ,&nbsp;Rafaela Vidal Paiva de Sousa ,&nbsp;Maiara Rosa dos Santos ,&nbsp;Giovana Diniz de Oliveira Bonetti ,&nbsp;Rafael José Vargas Alves ,&nbsp;Claudia Giuliano Bica","doi":"10.1016/j.adcanc.2024.100116","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Following the declaration of COVID-19 as a pandemic in February 2020, one of the most important public health impacts was the decrease in demand for screening mammography, with a consequent impact on the early diagnosis of breast cancer. Therefore, the aim of this study was to compare the initial clinical staging of women with breast cancer in the pre-pandemic and pandemic periods at a reference cancer hospital in southern Brazil. We performed a retrospective cross-sectional study with a database of surgical procedures on the female breast, comparing the years 2019 and 2020. A total of 1733 surgical procedures for diagnostic and curative purposes were evaluated. Among these patients, 491 (49.2 %) were diagnosed with breast cancer in 2019 and 335 (45.5 %) in 2020. We excluded 907 patients due to benign diagnoses, carcinoma in situ, recurrence, presence of metastases, missing data, and other findings. When comparing 2019 and 2020, we found no significant difference in clinical staging or tumor phenotype. The median time in days between mammography and first treatment was also similar in both years. However, we observed a higher frequency of lobular histologies and neoadjuvant therapy as first treatment choice in the pandemic year. In conclusion, there was no significant difference in clinical staging between women diagnosed with breast cancer before and during the pandemic.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72083,"journal":{"name":"Advances in cancer biology - metastasis","volume":"10 ","pages":"Article 100116"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667394024000030/pdfft?md5=f030741135c91cd7818903be0debc5ed&pid=1-s2.0-S2667394024000030-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in cancer biology - metastasis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667394024000030","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Following the declaration of COVID-19 as a pandemic in February 2020, one of the most important public health impacts was the decrease in demand for screening mammography, with a consequent impact on the early diagnosis of breast cancer. Therefore, the aim of this study was to compare the initial clinical staging of women with breast cancer in the pre-pandemic and pandemic periods at a reference cancer hospital in southern Brazil. We performed a retrospective cross-sectional study with a database of surgical procedures on the female breast, comparing the years 2019 and 2020. A total of 1733 surgical procedures for diagnostic and curative purposes were evaluated. Among these patients, 491 (49.2 %) were diagnosed with breast cancer in 2019 and 335 (45.5 %) in 2020. We excluded 907 patients due to benign diagnoses, carcinoma in situ, recurrence, presence of metastases, missing data, and other findings. When comparing 2019 and 2020, we found no significant difference in clinical staging or tumor phenotype. The median time in days between mammography and first treatment was also similar in both years. However, we observed a higher frequency of lobular histologies and neoadjuvant therapy as first treatment choice in the pandemic year. In conclusion, there was no significant difference in clinical staging between women diagnosed with breast cancer before and during the pandemic.

COVID-19 对乳腺癌临床分期的影响:横断面研究
COVID-19 于 2020 年 2 月被宣布为大流行病后,最重要的公共卫生影响之一是乳房 X 光筛查的需求减少,从而影响了乳腺癌的早期诊断。因此,本研究旨在比较巴西南部一家癌症参考医院在大流行前和大流行期间乳腺癌女性患者的初始临床分期。我们利用女性乳腺手术数据库进行了一项回顾性横断面研究,对 2019 年和 2020 年进行了比较。共对 1733 例诊断性和治疗性手术进行了评估。在这些患者中,2019 年有 491 人(49.2%)被诊断为乳腺癌,2020 年有 335 人(45.5%)被诊断为乳腺癌。由于良性诊断、原位癌、复发、存在转移、数据缺失以及其他原因,我们排除了 907 名患者。对比 2019 年和 2020 年,我们发现在临床分期或肿瘤表型方面没有明显差异。从乳房 X 射线照相到首次治疗的中位时间(天数)在这两年也相似。不过,我们观察到,在大流行年,小叶组织学和新辅助治疗作为首次治疗选择的频率更高。总之,大流行前和大流行期间确诊为乳腺癌的妇女在临床分期方面没有明显差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Advances in cancer biology - metastasis
Advances in cancer biology - metastasis Cancer Research, Oncology
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
103 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信