Residual stress and material symmetry

IF 5.7 1区工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY

International Journal of Engineering Science Pub Date : 2024-01-29 DOI:10.1016/j.ijengsci.2023.104013

K.R. Rajagopal , A. Wineman

引用次数: 0

Abstract

There seems to be a basic misconception in several recent papers concerning the material symmetry of bodies in configurations that are pre-stressed. In this short paper we point to the source of the error and show that the material symmetry that is possible depends on the nature of the pre-stress. We also extend the results for material symmetry which have been well-known within the context of simple elastic solids to the general class of simple materials. This generalization has relevance to the material symmetry of biological solids that are viscoelastic.

查看原文本刊更多论文

残余应力和材料对称性

在最近的几篇论文中，关于预应力构型中物体的材料对称性似乎存在一个基本的误解。在这篇短文中，我们指出了错误的根源，并表明可能的材料对称性取决于预应力的性质。我们还将在简单弹性固体背景下众所周知的材料对称性结果扩展到一般的简单材料类别。这种推广对具有粘弹性的生物固体的材料对称性具有现实意义。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

International Journal of Engineering Science 工程技术-工程：综合

CiteScore

11.80

自引率

16.70%

发文量

审稿时长

45 days

期刊介绍： The International Journal of Engineering Science is not limited to a specific aspect of science and engineering but is instead devoted to a wide range of subfields in the engineering sciences. While it encourages a broad spectrum of contribution in the engineering sciences, its core interest lies in issues concerning material modeling and response. Articles of interdisciplinary nature are particularly welcome. The primary goal of the new editors is to maintain high quality of publications. There will be a commitment to expediting the time taken for the publication of the papers. The articles that are sent for reviews will have names of the authors deleted with a view towards enhancing the objectivity and fairness of the review process. Articles that are devoted to the purely mathematical aspects without a discussion of the physical implications of the results or the consideration of specific examples are discouraged. Articles concerning material science should not be limited merely to a description and recording of observations but should contain theoretical or quantitative discussion of the results.