Does Dressing Choice Affect Infection Rate in Percutaneous K-Wiring of the Hand and Wrist? - A Systematic Review.

IF 0.5 Q4 SURGERY
Juliet Margaret Clutton, Alison Frances Kinghorn, Ryan William Trickett
{"title":"Does Dressing Choice Affect Infection Rate in Percutaneous K-Wiring of the Hand and Wrist? - A Systematic Review.","authors":"Juliet Margaret Clutton, Alison Frances Kinghorn, Ryan William Trickett","doi":"10.1142/S2424835524500012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Percutaneous Kirschner wire (K-wire) fixation of hand and wrist fractures is a common trauma procedure, yet there remains little consensus on the best management of wires postoperatively. If wire's ends are left external to the skin, it remains unknown which dressing regimen best reduces infection risk. We felt that a systematic review was required to assess the current consensus on this question within the published literature. <b>Methods:</b> An electronic search was carried out across multiple databases. Abstracts were screened by two independent reviewers against inclusion criteria and, where necessary, full texts were reviewed. Nine eligible papers were identified, and data regarding type of procedure, dressing choice and infection rate was extracted. <b>Results:</b> The included studies were widely heterogenous, and the standard of the evidence was, in general, poor. In most, dressing choice and infection incidence were not the primary intervention/outcome under study. <b>Conclusions:</b> Based on the available literature, insufficient evidence exists to establish one dressing choice as having a lower infection rate. This highlights the need for further high-quality evidence in this area. <b>Level of Evidence:</b> Level III (Therapeutic).</p>","PeriodicalId":51689,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hand Surgery-Asian-Pacific Volume","volume":"29 1","pages":"3-11"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hand Surgery-Asian-Pacific Volume","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1142/S2424835524500012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Percutaneous Kirschner wire (K-wire) fixation of hand and wrist fractures is a common trauma procedure, yet there remains little consensus on the best management of wires postoperatively. If wire's ends are left external to the skin, it remains unknown which dressing regimen best reduces infection risk. We felt that a systematic review was required to assess the current consensus on this question within the published literature. Methods: An electronic search was carried out across multiple databases. Abstracts were screened by two independent reviewers against inclusion criteria and, where necessary, full texts were reviewed. Nine eligible papers were identified, and data regarding type of procedure, dressing choice and infection rate was extracted. Results: The included studies were widely heterogenous, and the standard of the evidence was, in general, poor. In most, dressing choice and infection incidence were not the primary intervention/outcome under study. Conclusions: Based on the available literature, insufficient evidence exists to establish one dressing choice as having a lower infection rate. This highlights the need for further high-quality evidence in this area. Level of Evidence: Level III (Therapeutic).

敷料选择会影响手部和腕部经皮 K 线接线的感染率吗?- 系统回顾。
背景:经皮克氏线(K-wire)固定手部和腕部骨折是一种常见的创伤手术,但对于术后如何更好地处理克氏线仍缺乏共识。如果钢丝末端留在皮肤外,哪种敷料方案最能降低感染风险仍是未知数。我们认为有必要进行一次系统性回顾,以评估目前已发表文献中对这一问题的共识。方法:在多个数据库中进行电子检索。由两名独立审稿人根据纳入标准对摘要进行筛选,必要时对全文进行审阅。确定了 9 篇符合条件的论文,并提取了有关手术类型、敷料选择和感染率的数据。结果:所纳入的研究内容差异很大,总体而言证据水平较低。在大多数研究中,敷料选择和感染发生率并不是研究的主要干预措施/结果。结论:根据现有的文献资料,没有足够的证据证明某一种敷料可降低感染率。这表明在这一领域需要更多高质量的证据。证据等级:三级(治疗)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
304
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信