The association between METS-IR, an indirect index for insulin resistance, and lung cancer risk.

IF 3.7 3区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Guoqing Wang, Zhaopeng Zhu, Yi Wang, Qiang Zhang, Yungang Sun, Guanlian Pang, Wenjing Ge, Zhimin Ma, Huimin Ma, Linnan Gong, Hongxia Ma, Feng Shao, Meng Zhu
{"title":"The association between METS-IR, an indirect index for insulin resistance, and lung cancer risk.","authors":"Guoqing Wang, Zhaopeng Zhu, Yi Wang, Qiang Zhang, Yungang Sun, Guanlian Pang, Wenjing Ge, Zhimin Ma, Huimin Ma, Linnan Gong, Hongxia Ma, Feng Shao, Meng Zhu","doi":"10.1093/eurpub/ckad234","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Insulin resistance has been reported to increase the risk of breast, prostate and colorectal cancer. However, the role of insulin resistance and its interaction with genetic risk in the development of lung cancer remains controversial. Therefore, we aimed to explore the association between a novel metabolic score for insulin resistance (METS-IR) and lung cancer risk.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 395 304 participants without previous cancer at baseline were included. The Cox proportional hazards regression model was performed to investigate the association between METS-IR and lung cancer risk. In addition, a Mendelian randomization analysis was also performed to explore the causal relationship. The joint effects and additive interactions between METS-IR and polygenetic risk score (PRS) of lung cancer were also investigated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During a median follow-up of 11.03 years (Inter-quartile range (IQR): 10.30-11.73), a total of 3161 incident lung cancer cases were diagnosed in 395 304 participants. There was a significant association between METS-IR and lung cancer risk, with an HR of 1.28 (95% CI: 1.17-1.41). Based on the Mendelian randomization analysis, however, no causal associations were observed. We observed a joint effect but no interaction between METS-IR and genetic risk. The lung cancer incidence was estimated to be 100.42 (95% CI: 91.45-109.38) per 100 000 person-year for participants with a high METS-IR and PRS, while only 42.76 (95% CI: 36.94-48.59) with low METS-IR and PRS.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>High METS-IR was significantly associated with an increased risk of lung cancer. Keeping a low level of METS-IR might help reduce the long-term incident risk of lung cancer.</p>","PeriodicalId":12059,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Public Health","volume":" ","pages":"800-805"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11293818/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckad234","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Insulin resistance has been reported to increase the risk of breast, prostate and colorectal cancer. However, the role of insulin resistance and its interaction with genetic risk in the development of lung cancer remains controversial. Therefore, we aimed to explore the association between a novel metabolic score for insulin resistance (METS-IR) and lung cancer risk.

Methods: A total of 395 304 participants without previous cancer at baseline were included. The Cox proportional hazards regression model was performed to investigate the association between METS-IR and lung cancer risk. In addition, a Mendelian randomization analysis was also performed to explore the causal relationship. The joint effects and additive interactions between METS-IR and polygenetic risk score (PRS) of lung cancer were also investigated.

Results: During a median follow-up of 11.03 years (Inter-quartile range (IQR): 10.30-11.73), a total of 3161 incident lung cancer cases were diagnosed in 395 304 participants. There was a significant association between METS-IR and lung cancer risk, with an HR of 1.28 (95% CI: 1.17-1.41). Based on the Mendelian randomization analysis, however, no causal associations were observed. We observed a joint effect but no interaction between METS-IR and genetic risk. The lung cancer incidence was estimated to be 100.42 (95% CI: 91.45-109.38) per 100 000 person-year for participants with a high METS-IR and PRS, while only 42.76 (95% CI: 36.94-48.59) with low METS-IR and PRS.

Conclusions: High METS-IR was significantly associated with an increased risk of lung cancer. Keeping a low level of METS-IR might help reduce the long-term incident risk of lung cancer.

胰岛素抵抗间接指数 METS-IR 与肺癌风险之间的关系。
背景:据报道,胰岛素抵抗会增加罹患乳腺癌、前列腺癌和结肠直肠癌的风险。然而,胰岛素抵抗及其与遗传风险的相互作用在肺癌发病中的作用仍存在争议。因此,我们旨在探索胰岛素抵抗的新型代谢评分(METS-IR)与肺癌风险之间的关联:方法:共纳入 395 304 名基线时未患癌症的参与者。方法:共纳入 395 304 名基线时未患癌症的参与者,采用 Cox 比例危险回归模型研究 METS-IR 与肺癌风险之间的关系。此外,还进行了孟德尔随机分析,以探讨其中的因果关系。此外,还研究了METS-IR与肺癌多基因风险评分(PRS)之间的联合效应和相加交互作用:结果:在中位 11.03 年(四分位数间距(IQR):10.30-11.73)的随访期间,395 304 名参与者中共诊断出 3161 例肺癌病例。METS-IR与肺癌风险之间存在明显关联,HR值为1.28(95% CI:1.17-1.41)。不过,根据孟德尔随机分析,没有观察到因果关系。我们观察到 METS-IR 与遗传风险之间存在联合效应,但没有相互作用。据估计,METS-IR和PRS均较高的参与者的肺癌发病率为每10万人年100.42例(95% CI:91.45-109.38),而METS-IR和PRS均较低的参与者的肺癌发病率仅为每10万人年42.76例(95% CI:36.94-48.59):结论:高 METS-IR 与罹患肺癌的风险增加密切相关。结论:高 METS-IR 与肺癌风险增加有明显关联,保持低水平的 METS-IR 可能有助于降低肺癌的长期发病风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Journal of Public Health
European Journal of Public Health 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
2.30%
发文量
2039
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Public Health (EJPH) is a multidisciplinary journal aimed at attracting contributions from epidemiology, health services research, health economics, social sciences, management sciences, ethics and law, environmental health sciences, and other disciplines of relevance to public health. The journal provides a forum for discussion and debate of current international public health issues, with a focus on the European Region. Bi-monthly issues contain peer-reviewed original articles, editorials, commentaries, book reviews, news, letters to the editor, announcements of events, and various other features.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信