Analysis of Prospective Teacher Students Errors in Making Math Test Instruments Based on Bloom's Taxonomy Revised

Yusuf Adhitya
{"title":"Analysis of Prospective Teacher Students Errors in Making Math Test Instruments Based on Bloom's Taxonomy Revised","authors":"Yusuf Adhitya","doi":"10.61978/eduscape.v2i1.131","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to describe the errors of prospective teacher students in making math test instruments based on cognitive levels from the Bloom’s Taxonomy Revised (BTR). BTR consists of LOTS (C1-C3) and HOTS (C4-C6) levels. This research included descriptive qualitative research. The subjects of this study were 19 prospective teacher students, namely the mathematics education department in the Mathematics Learning Evaluation course. Based on the results of the study, it was obtained that prospective teacher students made mistakes at both levels but more at the HOTS level. At the LOTS level, it is on the error level C3; at the HOTS level, it is spread at all levels, namely C4-C6. An indication of error that often arises is that prospective teacher students cannot compile questions according to their level of cognition. The questions made are often still below the level they should be. The level of the questions made is still below the level that it should be.","PeriodicalId":514255,"journal":{"name":"Eduscape : Journal of Education Insight","volume":" 22","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Eduscape : Journal of Education Insight","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.61978/eduscape.v2i1.131","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aims to describe the errors of prospective teacher students in making math test instruments based on cognitive levels from the Bloom’s Taxonomy Revised (BTR). BTR consists of LOTS (C1-C3) and HOTS (C4-C6) levels. This research included descriptive qualitative research. The subjects of this study were 19 prospective teacher students, namely the mathematics education department in the Mathematics Learning Evaluation course. Based on the results of the study, it was obtained that prospective teacher students made mistakes at both levels but more at the HOTS level. At the LOTS level, it is on the error level C3; at the HOTS level, it is spread at all levels, namely C4-C6. An indication of error that often arises is that prospective teacher students cannot compile questions according to their level of cognition. The questions made are often still below the level they should be. The level of the questions made is still below the level that it should be.
基于布鲁姆分类法修订版的准师范生数学测试工具制作错误分析
本研究旨在描述准师范生在根据布卢姆分类法修订版(BTR)的认知水平制作数学测试工具时出现的错误。BTR 包括 LOTS(C1-C3)和 HOTS(C4-C6)两个层次。本研究包括描述性定性研究。研究对象是 19 名准师范生,即数学教育系的数学学习评价课程。根据研究结果,准师范生在两个水平上都犯了错误,但在 HOTS 水平上犯的错误更多。在 LOTS 阶段,错误水平为 C3;在 HOTS 阶段,错误分布在所有水平,即 C4-C6。经常出现错误的一个迹象是,准师范生不能根据自己的认知水平编制问题。所提的问题往往还达不到应有的水平。所提问题的水平仍然低于应有的水平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信