Judicial communication as a object of legal regulation

O. A. Sukhorukova
{"title":"Judicial communication as a object of legal regulation","authors":"O. A. Sukhorukova","doi":"10.17803/2311-5998.2023.110.10.047-054","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Judicial communication has a great influence on the effectiveness of procedural mechanisms for the protection of violated rights, because in its main manifestation is the actual content of the procedural legal relationship. Despite this, judicial communication does not receive the necessary attention at the legislative level due to the weak theoretical development of this issue. As a consequence of this approach, the full potential of the civil (arbitration) procedural form cannot be implemented, and in some cases neglecting the interests of judicial communication creates obstacles to the right to judicial protection and entails a violation of key principles of the process. Overcoming the negative effects is possible, first of all, by reconsidering the limits of the use in judicial enforcement of the classical legal means of regulating social relations (the rule of law, principles, legal consciousness, legal culture).","PeriodicalId":238867,"journal":{"name":"Courier of Kutafin Moscow State Law University (MSAL))","volume":" 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Courier of Kutafin Moscow State Law University (MSAL))","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17803/2311-5998.2023.110.10.047-054","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Judicial communication has a great influence on the effectiveness of procedural mechanisms for the protection of violated rights, because in its main manifestation is the actual content of the procedural legal relationship. Despite this, judicial communication does not receive the necessary attention at the legislative level due to the weak theoretical development of this issue. As a consequence of this approach, the full potential of the civil (arbitration) procedural form cannot be implemented, and in some cases neglecting the interests of judicial communication creates obstacles to the right to judicial protection and entails a violation of key principles of the process. Overcoming the negative effects is possible, first of all, by reconsidering the limits of the use in judicial enforcement of the classical legal means of regulating social relations (the rule of law, principles, legal consciousness, legal culture).
作为法律规范对象的司法交流
司法沟通对保护被侵犯权利的程序机制的有效性具有重大影响,因为其主要表现形式是程序法律关系的实际内容。尽管如此,由于对这一问题的理论研究薄弱,司法沟通在立法层面并未得到必要的重视。这种做法的后果是,民事(仲裁)程序形式的潜力无法得到充分发挥,在某些情况下,忽视司法沟通的利益会对司法保护权造成障碍,并导致违反程序的主要原则。要克服这些负面影响,首先要重新考虑在司法执行中使用调节社会关系的经典法律手段(法治、原则、法律意识、法律文化)的局限性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信