On the matter of reasonability of online communication of the court with an expert and a specialist in civil procedure

A. A. Lukashin
{"title":"On the matter of reasonability of online communication of the court with an expert and a specialist in civil procedure","authors":"A. A. Lukashin","doi":"10.17803/2311-5998.2023.110.10.200-206","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article is devoted to the issues of remote participation of an expert and a specialist in court sessions in the civil procedure. The author evaluates the admissibility of the construction of legal regulation of the issue under study only from the point of convenience and economy. Concerns expressed in the scientific and professional community related to the possibility of exerting pressure on witnesses when they participate in a court hearing using web conference are considered. The preservation of the risks noted in relation to the remote participation of witnesses during the interrogation of an expert and obtaining expert advice using web conference systems is justified. In conclusion, the author states that the unification of the provisions on remote participation in the court session of persons participating in the case and persons assisting in the administration of justice could not be assessed as successful.","PeriodicalId":238867,"journal":{"name":"Courier of Kutafin Moscow State Law University (MSAL))","volume":" 36","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Courier of Kutafin Moscow State Law University (MSAL))","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17803/2311-5998.2023.110.10.200-206","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article is devoted to the issues of remote participation of an expert and a specialist in court sessions in the civil procedure. The author evaluates the admissibility of the construction of legal regulation of the issue under study only from the point of convenience and economy. Concerns expressed in the scientific and professional community related to the possibility of exerting pressure on witnesses when they participate in a court hearing using web conference are considered. The preservation of the risks noted in relation to the remote participation of witnesses during the interrogation of an expert and obtaining expert advice using web conference systems is justified. In conclusion, the author states that the unification of the provisions on remote participation in the court session of persons participating in the case and persons assisting in the administration of justice could not be assessed as successful.
关于法院与民事诉讼专家在线交流的合理性问题
文章专门讨论了民事诉讼中专家和专业人员远程参与庭审的问题。作者仅从便利性和经济性的角度对所研究问题的法律规范建设的可接受性进行了评估。作者考虑了科学界和专业界对证人在使用网络会议参与庭审时可能受到压力的担忧。对证人在使用网络会议系统接受专家讯问和获取专家意见时的远程参与风险的保护是有道理的。最后,提交人指出,关于案件参与人员和司法协助人员远程参与庭审的规定的统一不能被评定为 成功。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信