Normative Demand for Deference in Political Solidarity

Kerri Woods, Joshua Hobbs
{"title":"Normative Demand for Deference in Political Solidarity","authors":"Kerri Woods, Joshua Hobbs","doi":"10.21248/gjn.14.01.274","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Allies of those experiencing injustice or oppression face a dilemma: to be neutral in the face of calls to solidarity risks siding with oppressors, yet to speak or act on behalf of others risks compounding the injustice. We argue that adhering to a normative demand for deference (NDD) to those with lived experience offers would-be allies a way of navigating this dilemma. While theorists of solidarity have generally focused on epistemic benefits of the NDD, we identify a second important and neglected good in bearing witness. However, how the NDD can be adhered to in practice also raises challenges. While the literature focuses on a gold standard model of direct engagement, we defend a valuable role for a second-order form of engagement through reading, films, and similar media. This second-order form of engagement may be particularly salient for global and transnational solidarity, an important element of contemporary global politics.","PeriodicalId":117351,"journal":{"name":"Global Justice : Theory Practice Rhetoric","volume":" 25","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Justice : Theory Practice Rhetoric","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21248/gjn.14.01.274","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Allies of those experiencing injustice or oppression face a dilemma: to be neutral in the face of calls to solidarity risks siding with oppressors, yet to speak or act on behalf of others risks compounding the injustice. We argue that adhering to a normative demand for deference (NDD) to those with lived experience offers would-be allies a way of navigating this dilemma. While theorists of solidarity have generally focused on epistemic benefits of the NDD, we identify a second important and neglected good in bearing witness. However, how the NDD can be adhered to in practice also raises challenges. While the literature focuses on a gold standard model of direct engagement, we defend a valuable role for a second-order form of engagement through reading, films, and similar media. This second-order form of engagement may be particularly salient for global and transnational solidarity, an important element of contemporary global politics.
政治团结中对服从的规范性要求
遭遇不公正或压迫的人的盟友面临着两难境地:面对声援呼吁保持中立,有可能站在压迫者一边,而代表他人发言或行动,又有可能加剧不公正。我们认为,对那些有生活经验的人坚持尊重的规范性要求(NDD),为可能的盟友提供了一种驾驭这种两难境地的方法。团结理论家们通常关注 NDD 在认识论上的益处,而我们则在见证中发现了第二个被忽视的重要益处。然而,如何在实践中遵守 NDD 也提出了挑战。虽然文献侧重于直接参与的黄金标准模式,但我们为通过阅读、电影和类似媒体的二阶参与形式的宝贵作用进行了辩护。这种二阶参与形式可能对全球和跨国团结尤为重要,而这正是当代全球政治的一个重要因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信