Axioms and Intuitions about Societal Inequality

Samuel Bowles, Wendy Carlin
{"title":"Axioms and Intuitions about Societal Inequality","authors":"Samuel Bowles, Wendy Carlin","doi":"10.25071/1874-6322.40591","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We show that Corrado Gini’s “concentration ratio” is an informative measure of experienced inequality that (as he pointed out)  varies from one (his “maximum concentration”) to zero (“minimum concentration”), a feature that does not hold (except in infinite populations) for the measure advocated in the contribution to this symposium by our colleague, Debraj Ray.  Through a social network representation of inequality and  a series of examples, we clarify the differing intuitions about the nature of inequality that alternative measures of inequality capture. ","PeriodicalId":142300,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Income Distribution®","volume":"59 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Income Distribution®","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25071/1874-6322.40591","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We show that Corrado Gini’s “concentration ratio” is an informative measure of experienced inequality that (as he pointed out)  varies from one (his “maximum concentration”) to zero (“minimum concentration”), a feature that does not hold (except in infinite populations) for the measure advocated in the contribution to this symposium by our colleague, Debraj Ray.  Through a social network representation of inequality and  a series of examples, we clarify the differing intuitions about the nature of inequality that alternative measures of inequality capture. 
关于社会不平等的公理和直觉
我们证明,科拉多-基尼的 "集中率 "是对经验不平等的一种有信息量的度量,它(正如他所指出的)从一(他的 "最大集中率")到零("最小集中率")都在变化,而我们的同事德布拉吉-雷(Debraj Ray)在本次研讨会上发表的论文中所倡导的度量方法却不具备这一特征(无限人口除外)。 通过对不平等的社会网络表述和一系列实例,我们澄清了其他不平等度量方法对不平等性质的不同直觉。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信