Effectiveness of Dry Needling on Upper Trapezitis Patient Compared to Ultrasound Therapy

Arthi.K, Muthukumaran Jothilingam
{"title":"Effectiveness of Dry Needling on Upper Trapezitis Patient Compared to Ultrasound Therapy","authors":"Arthi.K, Muthukumaran Jothilingam","doi":"10.37506/wayv4h98","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: This study was designed to inspect the effectiveness of Dry Needling on Upper Trapezitis patientcompared to Ultrasound TherapyPurpose: To compare the effectiveness of dry needling on upper trapezitis patients compared to ultrasoundtherapy.Materials and Methods: Fifty participants were divided into a couple of categories: Group A received dryneedling twice a week, while Group B received ultrasound therapy four times a week for two weeks. Stretchingand strengthening exercises were given to all groups. Participants were evaluated using the Pain Rating Scale(NPRS), cervical lateral flexion range of motion, and cervical rotation range of motion at two intervals (before andafter treatment). Study period: November 2022 to April 2023Result: According to the statistical evaluation, there was a significant within-group improvement for NPRS andCROM (Lateral Flexion and Cervical Rotation) before and after therapy for both Groups A and B, with a p value of0.0001. With a higher effectiveness for DRY NEEDLING in lowering discomfort and enhancing ROM, the betweengroupevaluation is statistically significant with p<0.0001 for NPRS and p<0.0001 for CROM (lateral flexion andcervical rotation).Conclusion: Dry needling is more effective than ultrasound therapy in upper trapezitis","PeriodicalId":516273,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Physiotherapy &amp; Occupational Therapy - An International Journal","volume":"5 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Physiotherapy &amp; Occupational Therapy - An International Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37506/wayv4h98","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This study was designed to inspect the effectiveness of Dry Needling on Upper Trapezitis patientcompared to Ultrasound TherapyPurpose: To compare the effectiveness of dry needling on upper trapezitis patients compared to ultrasoundtherapy.Materials and Methods: Fifty participants were divided into a couple of categories: Group A received dryneedling twice a week, while Group B received ultrasound therapy four times a week for two weeks. Stretchingand strengthening exercises were given to all groups. Participants were evaluated using the Pain Rating Scale(NPRS), cervical lateral flexion range of motion, and cervical rotation range of motion at two intervals (before andafter treatment). Study period: November 2022 to April 2023Result: According to the statistical evaluation, there was a significant within-group improvement for NPRS andCROM (Lateral Flexion and Cervical Rotation) before and after therapy for both Groups A and B, with a p value of0.0001. With a higher effectiveness for DRY NEEDLING in lowering discomfort and enhancing ROM, the betweengroupevaluation is statistically significant with p<0.0001 for NPRS and p<0.0001 for CROM (lateral flexion andcervical rotation).Conclusion: Dry needling is more effective than ultrasound therapy in upper trapezitis
干针疗法与超声波疗法对上斜肌炎患者的疗效比较
背景:本研究旨在考察干针疗法与超声波疗法对上斜方肌炎患者的疗效:目的: 比较干针疗法与超声波疗法对上斜肌炎患者的疗效:将 50 名参与者分为两组:A 组每周接受两次干针治疗,B 组每周接受四次超声波治疗,为期两周。所有组别都进行了伸展和强化训练。每隔两次(治疗前和治疗后)使用疼痛评分量表(NPRS)、颈椎侧屈活动范围和颈椎旋转活动范围对参与者进行评估。研究时间结果:根据统计评估,A 组和 B 组的 NPRS 和 CROM(侧屈和颈椎旋转)在治疗前后均有显著的组内改善,P 值为 0.0001。干针疗法在降低不适感和提高活动度方面的效果更佳,组间评估在 NPRS 和 CROM(侧屈和颈椎旋转)方面具有统计学意义,P<0.0001:结论:干针疗法对上斜方肌炎的疗效优于超声波疗法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信