Accountable to whom? Relational accountability in social research

IF 1.4 4区教育学 Q2 ANTHROPOLOGY

Anthropology & Education Quarterly Pub Date : 2024-01-25 DOI:10.1111/aeq.12495

Arshad I. Ali, Rachel L. Talbert

引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper explores research in the always already colonized spaces of academia with people in what is now the United States. In research projects, Wilson (2008) reminds us to begin with community relationships. Through ethnographic work, we trouble the idea of beginning research via local powerbrokers, who may privilege particular narratives and individuals. We offer reflections reconsidering power dynamics in community-based ethnographic studies suggesting ways to think about who research relationships are built with.

查看原文本刊更多论文

对谁负责？社会研究中的关系问责

本文探讨了在已经殖民化的学术空间中与现在的美国人开展的研究。在研究项目中，威尔逊（Wilson，2008 年）提醒我们从社区关系入手。通过人种学工作，我们对通过当地权力掮客开始研究的想法提出了质疑，他们可能会对特定的叙述和个人给予特权。我们对基于社区的人种学研究中的权力动态进行了重新思考，并提出了与谁建立研究关系的思考方法。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Anthropology & Education Quarterly Multiple-

CiteScore

3.30

自引率

7.70%

发文量

期刊介绍： Anthropology & Education Quarterly is a peer-reviewed journal that publishes scholarship on schooling in social and cultural context and on human learning both inside and outside of schools. Articles rely primarily on ethnographic research to address immediate problems of practice as well as broad theoretical questions. AEQ also publishes on the teaching of anthropology.