Knowledge of Oral Emergency Contraception Among Pharmacy Students.

IF 1.6 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Women's health reports (New Rochelle, N.Y.) Pub Date : 2024-01-23 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1089/whr.2023.0175
Bria Nikole Blake, Samantha Bookbinder, Gweneth Lazenby, Amari Marshall, Elizabeth Weed, Michelle Meglin
{"title":"Knowledge of Oral Emergency Contraception Among Pharmacy Students.","authors":"Bria Nikole Blake, Samantha Bookbinder, Gweneth Lazenby, Amari Marshall, Elizabeth Weed, Michelle Meglin","doi":"10.1089/whr.2023.0175","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Access to emergency contraception is an important consideration in preventing unintended pregnancies. Inconsistent information about emergency contraceptive given to patients at retail pharmacies may limit access.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>In this study, we aimed to assess pharmacy students' knowledge of oral emergency contraception.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Students in a Doctor of Pharmacy program completed a confidential survey about their knowledge of and training on oral emergency contraception. Respondents self-reported demographics included age, race, ethnicity, gender, and year in pharmacy school. The survey questions assessed student knowledge of indications, availability, side effects, and mechanisms of action of oral emergency contraception, as well as their training on emergency contraception. Chi-squared and Fisher's exact tests were used to determine if demographics influenced knowledge outcomes. A multivariate logistic regression, including age, gender, ethnicity, religion, year of training, hours of education, and source of knowledge acquisition, was used to adjust for confounding variables.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 296 pharmacy students, 31% (92/296) completed the survey. Among respondents, 34% (31/92) showed adequate knowledge of oral emergency contraception based on four critical knowledge questions. Third- and fourth-year students were more likely to have adequate knowledge than first- and second-year students (odds ratio [OR], 2.70; confidence interval [95% CI], 1.07-6.80). Students who reported learning about emergency contraception through reading assignments were more likely to have adequate knowledge than students who did not report learning from reading assignments (OR, 2.09; 95% CI, 1.30-3.35).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Most pharmacy students at a single academic center did not have adequate knowledge of oral emergency contraception. These findings highlight the need for trainings to improve pharmacy student knowledge of oral emergency contraception.</p>","PeriodicalId":75329,"journal":{"name":"Women's health reports (New Rochelle, N.Y.)","volume":"5 1","pages":"40-45"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10823165/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Women's health reports (New Rochelle, N.Y.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/whr.2023.0175","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Access to emergency contraception is an important consideration in preventing unintended pregnancies. Inconsistent information about emergency contraceptive given to patients at retail pharmacies may limit access.

Objective: In this study, we aimed to assess pharmacy students' knowledge of oral emergency contraception.

Methods: Students in a Doctor of Pharmacy program completed a confidential survey about their knowledge of and training on oral emergency contraception. Respondents self-reported demographics included age, race, ethnicity, gender, and year in pharmacy school. The survey questions assessed student knowledge of indications, availability, side effects, and mechanisms of action of oral emergency contraception, as well as their training on emergency contraception. Chi-squared and Fisher's exact tests were used to determine if demographics influenced knowledge outcomes. A multivariate logistic regression, including age, gender, ethnicity, religion, year of training, hours of education, and source of knowledge acquisition, was used to adjust for confounding variables.

Results: Among 296 pharmacy students, 31% (92/296) completed the survey. Among respondents, 34% (31/92) showed adequate knowledge of oral emergency contraception based on four critical knowledge questions. Third- and fourth-year students were more likely to have adequate knowledge than first- and second-year students (odds ratio [OR], 2.70; confidence interval [95% CI], 1.07-6.80). Students who reported learning about emergency contraception through reading assignments were more likely to have adequate knowledge than students who did not report learning from reading assignments (OR, 2.09; 95% CI, 1.30-3.35).

Conclusions: Most pharmacy students at a single academic center did not have adequate knowledge of oral emergency contraception. These findings highlight the need for trainings to improve pharmacy student knowledge of oral emergency contraception.

药学专业学生对口服紧急避孕药的了解。
背景:获得紧急避孕药具是预防意外怀孕的一个重要考虑因素。零售药店向患者提供的紧急避孕药具信息不一致可能会限制患者获得紧急避孕药具:本研究旨在评估药剂学专业学生对口服紧急避孕药的了解程度:方法:药学博士课程的学生完成了一项保密调查,内容涉及他们对口服紧急避孕药的了解和培训。受访者自我报告的人口统计数据包括年龄、种族、民族、性别和药学院就读年级。调查问题评估了学生对口服紧急避孕药的适应症、可用性、副作用和作用机制的了解,以及他们接受紧急避孕培训的情况。利用卡方检验和费雪精确检验来确定人口统计学是否会影响知识结果。采用多变量逻辑回归(包括年龄、性别、种族、宗教信仰、培训年份、教育学时和知识获取来源)来调整混杂变量:在 296 名药学专业学生中,31%(92/296)完成了调查。根据四个关键知识问题,34% 的受访者(31/92)对口服紧急避孕药有足够的了解。与一年级和二年级学生相比,三年级和四年级学生更有可能充分了解相关知识(几率比 [OR],2.70;置信区间 [95%CI],1.07-6.80)。报告通过阅读作业了解紧急避孕知识的学生比没有报告通过阅读作业了解紧急避孕知识的学生更有可能掌握足够的知识(OR,2.09;95% CI,1.30-3.35):一个学术中心的大多数药剂学学生对口服紧急避孕药的知识掌握不足。这些发现突出表明,有必要通过培训来提高药剂学学生对口服紧急避孕药的认识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
18 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信