How Reproducible Are Manual Therapy Interventions in Trials for Low Back Pain? A Scoping Review.

IF 6 1区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
Jon J Ruzich, Mareli Klopper, Chris M Dohrmann, Daniel I Rhon, Jodi L Young
{"title":"How Reproducible Are Manual Therapy Interventions in Trials for Low Back Pain? A Scoping Review.","authors":"Jon J Ruzich, Mareli Klopper, Chris M Dohrmann, Daniel I Rhon, Jodi L Young","doi":"10.2519/jospt.2024.12201","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>OBJECTIVES:</b> To assess the reproducibility of manual therapy interventions used in clinical trials for low back pain (LBP), and summarize knowledge gaps in assessing the reproducibility of manual therapy interventions for LBP. <b>DESIGN:</b> Scoping review. <b>LITERATURE SEARCH:</b> PubMed, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and Embase were searched for trials from inception through April 2023. <b>STUDY SELECTION CRITERIA:</b> Randomized controlled trials were included if they described the use of manual therapy to treat LBP in adults 18 to 65 years old and were accessible in English. <b>DATA SYNTHESIS:</b> The Consensus on Exercise Reporting Template (CERT) checklist, used for exercise reporting, was previously modified for manual therapy reporting. This 11-item modified CERT was used to extract details of manual therapy reporting in the included trials. Frequency counts were calculated to identify items most and least commonly reported. <b>RESULTS:</b> Of 128 trials, none reported all 11 items of the modified CERT. The most commonly reported items were the description of how the application of manual therapy was decided (n = 113, 88.3%) and a description of adjunct interventions provided (n = 82, 64.1%). The least reported items were the description of an associated home program (n = 27, 21.1%) and a detailed description of the application of manual therapy (n = 22, 17.2%). <b>CONCLUSION:</b> Reporting of manual therapy interventions in trials investigating LBP was poor overall, limiting the reproducibility of these treatments. Using a checklist designed explicitly for manual therapy intervention reporting may improve reproducibility of these interventions and help align clinical outcomes with experimental findings. <i>J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2024;54(4):1-10. Epub 29 January 2024. doi:10.2519/jospt.2024.12201</i>.</p>","PeriodicalId":50099,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"248-257"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2519/jospt.2024.12201","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To assess the reproducibility of manual therapy interventions used in clinical trials for low back pain (LBP), and summarize knowledge gaps in assessing the reproducibility of manual therapy interventions for LBP. DESIGN: Scoping review. LITERATURE SEARCH: PubMed, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and Embase were searched for trials from inception through April 2023. STUDY SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomized controlled trials were included if they described the use of manual therapy to treat LBP in adults 18 to 65 years old and were accessible in English. DATA SYNTHESIS: The Consensus on Exercise Reporting Template (CERT) checklist, used for exercise reporting, was previously modified for manual therapy reporting. This 11-item modified CERT was used to extract details of manual therapy reporting in the included trials. Frequency counts were calculated to identify items most and least commonly reported. RESULTS: Of 128 trials, none reported all 11 items of the modified CERT. The most commonly reported items were the description of how the application of manual therapy was decided (n = 113, 88.3%) and a description of adjunct interventions provided (n = 82, 64.1%). The least reported items were the description of an associated home program (n = 27, 21.1%) and a detailed description of the application of manual therapy (n = 22, 17.2%). CONCLUSION: Reporting of manual therapy interventions in trials investigating LBP was poor overall, limiting the reproducibility of these treatments. Using a checklist designed explicitly for manual therapy intervention reporting may improve reproducibility of these interventions and help align clinical outcomes with experimental findings. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2024;54(4):1-10. Epub 29 January 2024. doi:10.2519/jospt.2024.12201.

腰背痛试验中人工疗法干预的可重复性如何?范围审查。
目的评估腰背痛(LBP)临床试验中使用的手法治疗干预措施的可重复性,并总结在评估腰背痛手法治疗干预措施的可重复性方面存在的知识差距。设计:范围界定审查。文献检索:在 PubMed、Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL)、Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) 和 Embase 中检索从开始到 2023 年 4 月的试验。研究筛选标准:如果随机对照试验描述了使用徒手疗法治疗 18-65 岁成年人的腰椎间盘突出症,且能以英语获取,则纳入该试验。数据合成:用于运动报告的运动报告模板共识(CERT)核对表曾针对徒手疗法报告进行过修改。这份由 11 个项目组成的 CERT 修订版用于提取所纳入试验中有关徒手疗法报告的详细信息。计算频数以确定最常报告和最不常报告的项目。结果:在 128 项试验中,没有一项试验报告了修改后 CERT 的全部 11 个项目。最常报告的项目是关于如何决定应用徒手疗法的描述(样本数=113,88.3%)和关于所提供的辅助干预措施的描述(样本数=82,64.1%)。报告最少的项目是相关家庭计划的描述(n=27,21.1%)和手法治疗应用的详细描述(n=22,17.2%)。结论:在研究腰椎间盘突出症的试验中,对手法治疗干预措施的报告总体较差,限制了这些治疗方法的可重复性。使用专门为徒手疗法干预报告设计的核对表可提高这些干预的可重复性,并有助于使临床结果与实验结果保持一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
4.90%
发文量
101
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy® (JOSPT®) publishes scientifically rigorous, clinically relevant content for physical therapists and others in the health care community to advance musculoskeletal and sports-related practice globally. To this end, JOSPT features the latest evidence-based research and clinical cases in musculoskeletal health, injury, and rehabilitation, including physical therapy, orthopaedics, sports medicine, and biomechanics. With an impact factor of 3.090, JOSPT is among the highest ranked physical therapy journals in Clarivate Analytics''s Journal Citation Reports, Science Edition (2017). JOSPT stands eighth of 65 journals in the category of rehabilitation, twelfth of 77 journals in orthopedics, and fourteenth of 81 journals in sport sciences. JOSPT''s 5-year impact factor is 4.061.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信