Patient Health Questionnaire-9: A clinimetric analysis.

IF 3.6 3区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Revista Brasileira de Psiquiatria Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-01-28 DOI:10.47626/1516-4446-2023-3449
Fiammetta Cosci, Kaj Sparle Christensen, Sara Ceccatelli, Chiara Patierno, Danilo Carrozzino
{"title":"Patient Health Questionnaire-9: A clinimetric analysis.","authors":"Fiammetta Cosci, Kaj Sparle Christensen, Sara Ceccatelli, Chiara Patierno, Danilo Carrozzino","doi":"10.47626/1516-4446-2023-3449","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) is a widely used self-report measure of depression whose psychometric properties were found to be merely acceptable. Insufficient attention has been devoted to its clinimetric validity, while its clinical utility is still debated, particularly for assessing depression severity. This is the first study to test the PHQ-9 construct validity and clinical utility based on clinimetric principles.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An online survey of 3,398 participants was conducted. Item response theory models (Rasch and Mokken analyses) were used to assess the PHQ-9 validity and determine its clinical utility.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fit to the Rasch model was achieved after adjusting the sample size. Items 2, 4, 6, and 9 over-discriminated, while items 1, 5, and 7 under-discriminated. Local dependency between items 2 and 6 was indicated. The PHQ-9 was not unidimensional. A Loevinger's coefficient of 0.49 was found, indicating an acceptable level of scalability.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The PHQ-9 is an instrument with potential clinical utility as an overall index of depression, mainly for screening purposes. Substantial revision, particularly in the wording of over- and under-discriminating items, is needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":21244,"journal":{"name":"Revista Brasileira de Psiquiatria","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11302993/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Brasileira de Psiquiatria","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47626/1516-4446-2023-3449","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) is a widely used self-report measure of depression whose psychometric properties were found to be merely acceptable. Insufficient attention has been devoted to its clinimetric validity, while its clinical utility is still debated, particularly for assessing depression severity. This is the first study to test the PHQ-9 construct validity and clinical utility based on clinimetric principles.

Methods: An online survey of 3,398 participants was conducted. Item response theory models (Rasch and Mokken analyses) were used to assess the PHQ-9 validity and determine its clinical utility.

Results: Fit to the Rasch model was achieved after adjusting the sample size. Items 2, 4, 6, and 9 over-discriminated, while items 1, 5, and 7 under-discriminated. Local dependency between items 2 and 6 was indicated. The PHQ-9 was not unidimensional. A Loevinger's coefficient of 0.49 was found, indicating an acceptable level of scalability.

Conclusion: The PHQ-9 is an instrument with potential clinical utility as an overall index of depression, mainly for screening purposes. Substantial revision, particularly in the wording of over- and under-discriminating items, is needed.

患者健康问卷-9:临床分析。
目的:患者健康问卷-9(Patient Health Questionnaire-9,PHQ-9)是一种广泛使用的自我报告式抑郁测量方法,其心理测量学特性尚可接受。人们对其临床有效性关注不够,对其临床效用仍有争议,尤其是在用于评估抑郁严重程度时。这是第一项基于临床测量原则测试 PHQ-9 构建有效性和临床实用性的研究:方法:对 3,398 名参与者进行了在线调查。采用项目反应理论模型(Rasch 和 Mokken 分析)评估 PHQ-9 的有效性并确定其临床实用性:结果:在调整样本量后,PHQ-9 与 Rasch 模型实现了拟合。项目 2、4、6、9 显示出过度区分,项目 1、5、7 显示出区分不足。项目 2 和 6 之间存在局部依赖性。PHQ-9 并非单维。洛文格系数为 0.49,表明其可扩展性达到了可接受的水平:结论:PHQ-9 是一种具有潜在临床实用性的测量方法,可用作抑郁症的总体指标,主要用于筛查目的。PHQ-9需要进行大量修订,特别是在过度和不足歧视项目的措辞方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Revista Brasileira de Psiquiatria
Revista Brasileira de Psiquiatria 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
83
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Revista Brasileira de Psiquiatria (RBP) is the official organ of the Associação Brasileira de Psiquiatria (ABP - Brazilian Association of Psychiatry). The Brazilian Journal of Psychiatry is a bimonthly publication that aims to publish original manuscripts in all areas of psychiatry, including public health, clinical epidemiology, basic science, and mental health problems. The journal is fully open access, and there are no article processing or publication fees. Articles must be written in English.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信