Liver-Directed Therapy Combined with Systemic Therapy: Current Status and Future Directions

IF 1 4区 医学 Q4 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Shamar Young, Jack Hannallah, Dan Goldberg, Mohammad Khreiss, Rachna Shroff, Junaid Arshad, Aaron Scott, Gregory Woodhead
{"title":"Liver-Directed Therapy Combined with Systemic Therapy: Current Status and Future Directions","authors":"Shamar Young, Jack Hannallah, Dan Goldberg, Mohammad Khreiss, Rachna Shroff, Junaid Arshad, Aaron Scott, Gregory Woodhead","doi":"10.1055/s-0043-1777711","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In the past several decades, major advances in both systemic and locoregional therapies have been made for many cancer patients. This has led to modern cancer treatment algorithms frequently calling for active interventions by multiple subspecialists at the same time. One of the areas where this can be clearly seen is the concomitant use of locoregional and systemic therapies in patients with primary or secondary cancers of the liver. These combined algorithms have gained favor over the last decade and are largely focused on the allure of the combined ability to control systemic disease while at the same time addressing refractory/resistant clonal populations. While the general concept has gained favor and is likely to only increase in popularity with the continued establishment of viable immunotherapy treatments, for many patients questions remain. Lingering concerns over the increase in toxicity when combining treatment methods, patient selection, and sequencing remain for multiple cancer patient populations. While further work remains, some of these questions have been addressed in the literature. This article reviews the available data on three commonly treated primary and secondary cancers of the liver, namely, hepatocellular carcinoma, cholangiocarcinoma, and metastatic colorectal cancer. Furthermore, strengths and weaknesses are reviewed and future directions are discussed.</p> ","PeriodicalId":48689,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in Interventional Radiology","volume":"58 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Seminars in Interventional Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-1777711","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the past several decades, major advances in both systemic and locoregional therapies have been made for many cancer patients. This has led to modern cancer treatment algorithms frequently calling for active interventions by multiple subspecialists at the same time. One of the areas where this can be clearly seen is the concomitant use of locoregional and systemic therapies in patients with primary or secondary cancers of the liver. These combined algorithms have gained favor over the last decade and are largely focused on the allure of the combined ability to control systemic disease while at the same time addressing refractory/resistant clonal populations. While the general concept has gained favor and is likely to only increase in popularity with the continued establishment of viable immunotherapy treatments, for many patients questions remain. Lingering concerns over the increase in toxicity when combining treatment methods, patient selection, and sequencing remain for multiple cancer patient populations. While further work remains, some of these questions have been addressed in the literature. This article reviews the available data on three commonly treated primary and secondary cancers of the liver, namely, hepatocellular carcinoma, cholangiocarcinoma, and metastatic colorectal cancer. Furthermore, strengths and weaknesses are reviewed and future directions are discussed.

肝脏导向疗法与全身疗法相结合:现状与未来方向
在过去几十年中,许多癌症患者在全身和局部治疗方面都取得了重大进展。这导致现代癌症治疗算法经常需要多个亚专科医生同时进行积极干预。肝脏原发性或继发性癌症患者同时使用局部和全身疗法就是其中一个可以清楚看到这一点的领域。在过去的十年中,这些联合疗法受到了越来越多的青睐,其主要优势在于既能控制全身性疾病,又能解决难治/耐药克隆人群的问题。虽然这一总体概念已获得青睐,而且随着可行的免疫疗法的不断确立,这一概念可能只会越来越受欢迎,但对许多患者来说,问题依然存在。对于多种癌症患者群体来说,在结合治疗方法、患者选择和排序时,对毒性增加的担忧依然存在。尽管仍有进一步的工作要做,但文献中已对其中一些问题进行了探讨。本文回顾了肝癌、胆管癌和转移性结直肠癌这三种常用的原发性和继发性肝癌治疗方法的现有数据。此外,还回顾了优缺点,并讨论了未来的发展方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Seminars in Interventional Radiology
Seminars in Interventional Radiology RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING&nb-
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
7.10%
发文量
58
期刊介绍: Seminars in Interventional Radiology is a review journal that publishes topic-specific issues in the field of radiology and related sub-specialties. The journal provides comprehensive coverage of areas such as cardio-vascular imaging, oncologic interventional radiology, abdominal interventional radiology, ultrasound, MRI imaging, sonography, pediatric radiology, musculoskeletal radiology, metallic stents, renal intervention, angiography, neurointerventions, and CT fluoroscopy along with other areas. The journal''s content is suitable for both the practicing radiologist as well as residents in training.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信