Learning Failure-Inducing Models for Testing Software-Defined Networks

IF 6.6 2区 计算机科学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING
Raphaël Ollando, Seung Yeob Shin, Lionel C. Briand
{"title":"Learning Failure-Inducing Models for Testing Software-Defined Networks","authors":"Raphaël Ollando, Seung Yeob Shin, Lionel C. Briand","doi":"10.1145/3641541","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Software-defined networks (SDN) enable flexible and effective communication systems that are managed by centralized software controllers. However, such a controller can undermine the underlying communication network of an SDN-based system and thus must be carefully tested. When an SDN-based system fails, in order to address such a failure, engineers need to precisely understand the conditions under which it occurs. In this article, we introduce a machine learning-guided fuzzing method, named FuzzSDN, aiming at both (1) generating effective test data leading to failures in SDN-based systems and (2) learning accurate failure-inducing models that characterize conditions under which such system fails. To our knowledge, no existing work simultaneously addresses these two objectives for SDNs. We evaluate FuzzSDN by applying it to systems controlled by two open-source SDN controllers. Further, we compare FuzzSDN with two state-of-the-art methods for fuzzing SDNs and two baselines for learning failure-inducing models. Our results show that (1) compared to the state-of-the-art methods, FuzzSDN generates at least 12 times more failures, within the same time budget, with a controller that is fairly robust to fuzzing and (2) our failure-inducing models have, on average, a precision of 98% and a recall of 86%, significantly outperforming the baselines.</p>","PeriodicalId":50933,"journal":{"name":"ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology","volume":"114 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3641541","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Software-defined networks (SDN) enable flexible and effective communication systems that are managed by centralized software controllers. However, such a controller can undermine the underlying communication network of an SDN-based system and thus must be carefully tested. When an SDN-based system fails, in order to address such a failure, engineers need to precisely understand the conditions under which it occurs. In this article, we introduce a machine learning-guided fuzzing method, named FuzzSDN, aiming at both (1) generating effective test data leading to failures in SDN-based systems and (2) learning accurate failure-inducing models that characterize conditions under which such system fails. To our knowledge, no existing work simultaneously addresses these two objectives for SDNs. We evaluate FuzzSDN by applying it to systems controlled by two open-source SDN controllers. Further, we compare FuzzSDN with two state-of-the-art methods for fuzzing SDNs and two baselines for learning failure-inducing models. Our results show that (1) compared to the state-of-the-art methods, FuzzSDN generates at least 12 times more failures, within the same time budget, with a controller that is fairly robust to fuzzing and (2) our failure-inducing models have, on average, a precision of 98% and a recall of 86%, significantly outperforming the baselines.

学习故障诱发模型以测试软件定义的网络
软件定义网络(SDN)可实现由集中式软件控制器管理的灵活有效的通信系统。然而,这种控制器可能会破坏基于 SDN 系统的底层通信网络,因此必须对其进行仔细测试。当基于 SDN 的系统发生故障时,为了解决这种故障,工程师需要精确了解故障发生的条件。在本文中,我们介绍了一种以机器学习为指导的模糊处理方法(名为 FuzzSDN),该方法旨在:(1)生成导致基于 SDN 的系统发生故障的有效测试数据;(2)学习准确的故障诱发模型,以描述此类系统发生故障的条件。据我们所知,目前还没有针对 SDN 同时实现这两个目标的工作。我们将 FuzzSDN 应用于由两个开源 SDN 控制器控制的系统,对其进行了评估。此外,我们还将 FuzzSDN 与用于模糊 SDN 的两种最先进方法以及用于学习故障诱发模型的两种基线进行了比较。我们的结果表明:(1) 与最先进的方法相比,FuzzSDN 在相同的时间预算内产生的故障至少多 12 倍,而且控制器对模糊处理具有相当高的鲁棒性;(2) 我们的故障诱发模型平均精确度为 98%,召回率为 86%,明显优于基线。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology
ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology 工程技术-计算机:软件工程
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
4.50%
发文量
164
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Designing and building a large, complex software system is a tremendous challenge. ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology (TOSEM) publishes papers on all aspects of that challenge: specification, design, development and maintenance. It covers tools and methodologies, languages, data structures, and algorithms. TOSEM also reports on successful efforts, noting practical lessons that can be scaled and transferred to other projects, and often looks at applications of innovative technologies. The tone is scholarly but readable; the content is worthy of study; the presentation is effective.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信