Associations between the intraoperative fraction of inspired intraoperative oxygen administration and days alive and out of hospital after surgery

Daniel R. Frei , Matthew R. Moore , Michael Bailey , Richard Beasley , Douglas Campbell , Kate Leslie , Paul S. Myles , Timothy G. Short , Paul J. Young
{"title":"Associations between the intraoperative fraction of inspired intraoperative oxygen administration and days alive and out of hospital after surgery","authors":"Daniel R. Frei ,&nbsp;Matthew R. Moore ,&nbsp;Michael Bailey ,&nbsp;Richard Beasley ,&nbsp;Douglas Campbell ,&nbsp;Kate Leslie ,&nbsp;Paul S. Myles ,&nbsp;Timothy G. Short ,&nbsp;Paul J. Young","doi":"10.1016/j.bjao.2023.100253","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>There is limited knowledge about the effect of liberal intraoperative oxygen on non-infectious complications and overall recovery from surgery.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>In this retrospective cohort study, we investigated associations between mean intraoperative fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO<sub>2</sub>), and outcome in adults undergoing elective surgery lasting more than 2 h at a large metropolitan New Zealand hospital from 2012 to 2020. Patients were divided into low, medium, and high oxygen groups (FiO<sub>2</sub> ≤ 0.4, 0.41–0.59, ≥0.6). The primary outcome was days alive and out of hospital at 90 days (DAOH<sub>90</sub>). The secondary outcomes were post-operative complications and admission to the ICU.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>We identified 15,449 patients who met the inclusion criteria. There was no association between FiO<sub>2</sub> and DAOH<sub>90</sub> when high FiO<sub>2</sub> was analysed according to three groups. Using high FiO<sub>2</sub> as the reference group there was an adjusted mean (95% confidence interval [CI]) difference of 0.09 (−0.06 to 0.25) days (<em>P</em> = 0.25) and 0.28 (−0.05 to 0.62) days (<em>P</em> = 0.2) in the intermediate and low oxygen groups, respectively. Low FiO<sub>2</sub> was associated with increased surgical site infection: the adjusted odds ratio (OR) for low compared with high FiO<sub>2</sub> was 1.53 (95% CI 1.12–2.10). Increasing FiO<sub>2</sub> was associated with respiratory complications: the adjusted OR associated with each 10% point increase in FiO<sub>2</sub> was 1.17 (95% CI 1.08–1.26) and the incidence of being admitted to an ICU had an adjusted OR of 1.1 (95% CI 1.03–1.18).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>We found potential benefits, and risks, associated with liberal intraoperative oxygen administration indicating that randomised controlled trials are warranted.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72418,"journal":{"name":"BJA open","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772609623001326/pdfft?md5=54c429035799b3844c8932da2e4aed82&pid=1-s2.0-S2772609623001326-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJA open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772609623001326","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

There is limited knowledge about the effect of liberal intraoperative oxygen on non-infectious complications and overall recovery from surgery.

Methods

In this retrospective cohort study, we investigated associations between mean intraoperative fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2), and outcome in adults undergoing elective surgery lasting more than 2 h at a large metropolitan New Zealand hospital from 2012 to 2020. Patients were divided into low, medium, and high oxygen groups (FiO2 ≤ 0.4, 0.41–0.59, ≥0.6). The primary outcome was days alive and out of hospital at 90 days (DAOH90). The secondary outcomes were post-operative complications and admission to the ICU.

Results

We identified 15,449 patients who met the inclusion criteria. There was no association between FiO2 and DAOH90 when high FiO2 was analysed according to three groups. Using high FiO2 as the reference group there was an adjusted mean (95% confidence interval [CI]) difference of 0.09 (−0.06 to 0.25) days (P = 0.25) and 0.28 (−0.05 to 0.62) days (P = 0.2) in the intermediate and low oxygen groups, respectively. Low FiO2 was associated with increased surgical site infection: the adjusted odds ratio (OR) for low compared with high FiO2 was 1.53 (95% CI 1.12–2.10). Increasing FiO2 was associated with respiratory complications: the adjusted OR associated with each 10% point increase in FiO2 was 1.17 (95% CI 1.08–1.26) and the incidence of being admitted to an ICU had an adjusted OR of 1.1 (95% CI 1.03–1.18).

Conclusions

We found potential benefits, and risks, associated with liberal intraoperative oxygen administration indicating that randomised controlled trials are warranted.

术中吸氧量与术后存活天数和出院天数之间的关系
方法在这项回顾性队列研究中,我们调查了 2012 年至 2020 年期间在新西兰一家大型都市医院接受 2 小时以上择期手术的成人的术中平均吸入氧分压(FiO2)与手术结果之间的关系。患者被分为低、中、高氧组(FiO2 ≤ 0.4、0.41-0.59、≥0.6)。主要结果是90天的存活和出院天数(DAOH90)。次要结果是术后并发症和入住重症监护室。根据三个组别对高 FiO2 进行分析后发现,FiO2 和 DAOH90 之间没有关联。以高 FiO2 为参照组,中氧组和低氧组的调整后平均(95% 置信区间 [CI])差异分别为 0.09(-0.06 至 0.25)天(P = 0.25)和 0.28(-0.05 至 0.62)天(P = 0.2)。低 FiO2 与手术部位感染增加有关:与高 FiO2 相比,低 FiO2 的调整赔率 (OR) 为 1.53(95% CI 1.12-2.10)。提高 FiO2 与呼吸系统并发症有关:FiO2 每提高 10%,调整后的相关 OR 为 1.17(95% CI 1.08-1.26),入住 ICU 的发生率调整后的 OR 为 1.1(95% CI 1.03-1.18)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BJA open
BJA open Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
83 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信