A comparative study between two different dose fractionation schedules of cobalt-60-based HDR intracavitary brachytherapy in carcinoma cervix stages IIB-IIIC1.

Vaibhav Gagrani, Jyoti Kabara, Arvind Shukla, N K Rathore, Vikram S Rajpurohit, Pawan K Jangid, Sumanta Manna
{"title":"A comparative study between two different dose fractionation schedules of cobalt-60-based HDR intracavitary brachytherapy in carcinoma cervix stages IIB-IIIC1.","authors":"Vaibhav Gagrani, Jyoti Kabara, Arvind Shukla, N K Rathore, Vikram S Rajpurohit, Pawan K Jangid, Sumanta Manna","doi":"10.4103/jcrt.jcrt_286_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>High dose rate (HDR) intracavitary brachytherapy (ICBT) is an integral element in the treatment of carcinoma uterine cervix. The main objective of brachytherapy in carcinoma cervix is to deliver a lethal dose to tumor cells without inducing unacceptable damage to the surrounding normal tissue. Because the absorbed dose falls off rapidly, higher doses can be safely delivered to the targeted tissue over a short time. The quest for optimum dose and fractionation schedule in HDR ICBT is still ongoing, and there is no uniform consensus. This study aimed to assess the acute dose-related toxicities of HDR brachytherapy schedule of 7 Gy x 3 fractions over 6 Gy x 4 fractions in the treatment of cervical cancer.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this study was to study the acute treatment-related gastrointestinal (GI) and genitourinary (GU) toxicities between two HDR brachytherapy regimens.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>This is a prospective institutional study carried out from May 2018 to September 2018. In this time period, 66 patients of cervical cancers fulfilling our inclusion criteria were treated with concurrent chemoradiation (CCRT) following brachytherapy. During treatment, patients were randomized to arm A-7 Gy per fraction for three fractions and arm B-6 Gy per fraction for four fractions. Acute GI and GU toxicities were assessed using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Version 4.03. All patients were kept for follow-up for 3 months in this study.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There is no statistically significant difference between the two arms for acute GI and GU toxicities, and the results were comparable.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Considering the increased hospital burden of locally advanced cervical cancer patients in the Indian context, the HDR brachytherapy schedule of 7 Gy per fraction is preferable to 6 Gy per fraction for a lesser fractionation schedule.</p>","PeriodicalId":94070,"journal":{"name":"Journal of cancer research and therapeutics","volume":" ","pages":"1551-1556"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of cancer research and therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jcrt.jcrt_286_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: High dose rate (HDR) intracavitary brachytherapy (ICBT) is an integral element in the treatment of carcinoma uterine cervix. The main objective of brachytherapy in carcinoma cervix is to deliver a lethal dose to tumor cells without inducing unacceptable damage to the surrounding normal tissue. Because the absorbed dose falls off rapidly, higher doses can be safely delivered to the targeted tissue over a short time. The quest for optimum dose and fractionation schedule in HDR ICBT is still ongoing, and there is no uniform consensus. This study aimed to assess the acute dose-related toxicities of HDR brachytherapy schedule of 7 Gy x 3 fractions over 6 Gy x 4 fractions in the treatment of cervical cancer.

Objective: The aim of this study was to study the acute treatment-related gastrointestinal (GI) and genitourinary (GU) toxicities between two HDR brachytherapy regimens.

Material and methods: This is a prospective institutional study carried out from May 2018 to September 2018. In this time period, 66 patients of cervical cancers fulfilling our inclusion criteria were treated with concurrent chemoradiation (CCRT) following brachytherapy. During treatment, patients were randomized to arm A-7 Gy per fraction for three fractions and arm B-6 Gy per fraction for four fractions. Acute GI and GU toxicities were assessed using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Version 4.03. All patients were kept for follow-up for 3 months in this study.

Results: There is no statistically significant difference between the two arms for acute GI and GU toxicities, and the results were comparable.

Conclusions: Considering the increased hospital burden of locally advanced cervical cancer patients in the Indian context, the HDR brachytherapy schedule of 7 Gy per fraction is preferable to 6 Gy per fraction for a lesser fractionation schedule.

宫颈癌 IIB-IIIC1 期钴-60 HDR 腔内近距离放射治疗两种不同剂量分次计划的比较研究。
简介高剂量率(HDR)腔内近距离放射治疗(ICBT)是治疗子宫颈癌的重要组成部分。宫颈癌近距离放射治疗的主要目的是向肿瘤细胞输送致命剂量,同时不对周围正常组织造成不可接受的损伤。由于吸收剂量会迅速下降,因此可以在短时间内安全地向靶组织输送较高剂量。对 HDR ICBT 的最佳剂量和分次计划的探索仍在进行中,目前还没有统一的共识。本研究旨在评估在治疗宫颈癌时,7 Gy x 3 次分次与 6 Gy x 4 次分次的 HDR 近距离放射治疗方案的急性剂量相关毒性:本研究旨在研究两种HDR近距离放射治疗方案之间与治疗相关的急性胃肠道(GI)和泌尿生殖系统(GU)毒性:这是一项前瞻性机构研究,开展时间为2018年5月至2018年9月。在此期间,66 名符合我们纳入标准的宫颈癌患者接受了近距离治疗后的同期化疗(CCRT)治疗。在治疗过程中,患者被随机分配到A组,每分三次,每次7 Gy;B组,每分四次,每次6 Gy。急性消化道和泌尿系统毒性采用不良事件通用术语标准(CTCAE)4.03版进行评估。本研究对所有患者进行了为期 3 个月的随访:结果:两组患者在急性消化道和泌尿系统毒性方面无统计学差异,结果相当:考虑到在印度,局部晚期宫颈癌患者的住院负担加重,HDR近距离放射治疗计划每分次7 Gy的分次计划优于每分次6 Gy的分次计划。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信