Outcomes of Eyes Lost to Follow-up After Treatment With Intraocular or Periocular Steroid Injections

IF 0.5 Q4 OPHTHALMOLOGY
R. Mahmoudzadeh, Mirataollah Salabati, Rachel N. Israilevich, John W. Hinkle, Anthony Obeid, M. Ali Khan, Jason Hsu, V. Chaudhary, Sunir J. Garg
{"title":"Outcomes of Eyes Lost to Follow-up After Treatment With Intraocular or Periocular Steroid Injections","authors":"R. Mahmoudzadeh, Mirataollah Salabati, Rachel N. Israilevich, John W. Hinkle, Anthony Obeid, M. Ali Khan, Jason Hsu, V. Chaudhary, Sunir J. Garg","doi":"10.1177/24741264231218044","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: To evaluate the visual, intraocular pressure (IOP), and anatomic outcomes of eyes with loss to follow-up (LTFU) after intravitreal or periocular steroid injections. Methods: Patients receiving intraocular or periocular steroid injections and LTFU for at least 180 days were included in this retrospective cohort study. Charts were reviewed for the visual acuity (VA), IOP, and central foveal thickness at the visit before LTFU, the first return visit, and 3, 6, and 12 months after return. Results: Fifty-three eyes of 47 patients were identified. The mean (±SD) age was 62.3 ± 14.9 years, the mean LTFU time was 295 ± 181.2 days (range, 182-1101), and the mean follow-up after return was 354 ± 339.3 days (range, 32-1141). The overall mean number of steroid injections was 5.2 ± 3.9 (range, 1-18). Compared with the mean logMAR VA at the visit before LTFU (0.59 [Snellen 20/77]), the mean VA remained stable at all timepoints after return as follows: return visit, 0.62 [20/83]; P = .6), month 3 (0.55 [20/70]; P = .6), month 6 (0.55 [20/70]; P = .5), month 12 (0.64 [20/87]; P = .6), and final visit (0.69 [20/97]; P = .2). At the first return visit, 8 (15%) of 53 patients had an IOP of 21 mm Hg or higher (range, 21-31); 2 required treatment with a new antihypertensive medication (latanoprost and timolol, respectively). Conclusion: Patients with LTFU after receiving steroid injections maintained their VA. No patient required incisional glaucoma surgery. Compared with other etiologies, eyes with diabetic macular edema had a greater increase in IOP.","PeriodicalId":17919,"journal":{"name":"Journal of VitreoRetinal Diseases","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of VitreoRetinal Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/24741264231218044","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the visual, intraocular pressure (IOP), and anatomic outcomes of eyes with loss to follow-up (LTFU) after intravitreal or periocular steroid injections. Methods: Patients receiving intraocular or periocular steroid injections and LTFU for at least 180 days were included in this retrospective cohort study. Charts were reviewed for the visual acuity (VA), IOP, and central foveal thickness at the visit before LTFU, the first return visit, and 3, 6, and 12 months after return. Results: Fifty-three eyes of 47 patients were identified. The mean (±SD) age was 62.3 ± 14.9 years, the mean LTFU time was 295 ± 181.2 days (range, 182-1101), and the mean follow-up after return was 354 ± 339.3 days (range, 32-1141). The overall mean number of steroid injections was 5.2 ± 3.9 (range, 1-18). Compared with the mean logMAR VA at the visit before LTFU (0.59 [Snellen 20/77]), the mean VA remained stable at all timepoints after return as follows: return visit, 0.62 [20/83]; P = .6), month 3 (0.55 [20/70]; P = .6), month 6 (0.55 [20/70]; P = .5), month 12 (0.64 [20/87]; P = .6), and final visit (0.69 [20/97]; P = .2). At the first return visit, 8 (15%) of 53 patients had an IOP of 21 mm Hg or higher (range, 21-31); 2 required treatment with a new antihypertensive medication (latanoprost and timolol, respectively). Conclusion: Patients with LTFU after receiving steroid injections maintained their VA. No patient required incisional glaucoma surgery. Compared with other etiologies, eyes with diabetic macular edema had a greater increase in IOP.
眼内或眼周类固醇注射治疗后失去随访眼的结果
目的:评估玻璃体内或眼周注射类固醇后失去随访(LTFU)的眼睛的视力、眼压(IOP)和解剖结果。方法:这项回顾性队列研究纳入了接受眼内或眼周类固醇注射且失访至少 180 天的患者。研究人员查看了患者在停药前、首次复诊、复诊后 3 个月、6 个月和 12 个月的视力 (VA)、眼压和中心眼窝厚度的病历。结果:确定了 47 名患者的 53 只眼睛。平均年龄(±SD)为 62.3 ± 14.9 岁,LTFU 平均时间为 295 ± 181.2 天(范围为 182-1101),复诊后平均随访时间为 354 ± 339.3 天(范围为 32-1141)。类固醇注射的总平均次数为 5.2 ± 3.9(范围为 1-18)次。与LTFU前就诊时的平均logMAR VA值(0.59 [Snellen 20/77])相比,复诊后所有时间点的平均VA值均保持稳定,具体如下:复诊时,0.62[20/83];P = .6)、第 3 个月(0.55 [20/70];P = .6)、第 6 个月(0.55 [20/70];P = .5)、第 12 个月(0.64 [20/87];P = .6)和最后一次回访(0.69 [20/97];P = .2)。在首次回访时,53 名患者中有 8 人(15%)的眼压达到或超过 21 毫米汞柱(范围为 21-31);2 人需要使用新的降压药物(分别是拉坦前列素和噻吗洛尔)。结论接受类固醇注射后,LTFU 患者的视力保持不变。没有患者需要进行青光眼切开手术。与其他病因相比,糖尿病性黄斑水肿患者的眼压上升幅度更大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
16.70%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信