A Mixed Methods Evaluation of a Quality Improvement Model to Optimize Perinatal and Primary Care in the Community Health Setting.

IF 4.4 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Jena Wallander Gemkow, Ashlee Van Schyndel, Renee M Odom, Ananya Stoller, Lisa Masinter, Ta-Yun Yang, Patricia A Lee King, Abigail C Holicky, Arden Handler
{"title":"A Mixed Methods Evaluation of a Quality Improvement Model to Optimize Perinatal and Primary Care in the Community Health Setting.","authors":"Jena Wallander Gemkow, Ashlee Van Schyndel, Renee M Odom, Ananya Stoller, Lisa Masinter, Ta-Yun Yang, Patricia A Lee King, Abigail C Holicky, Arden Handler","doi":"10.1370/afm.3059","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Many maternal deaths occur beyond the acute birth encounter. There are opportunities for improving maternal health outcomes through facilitated quality improvement efforts in community settings, particularly in the postpartum period. We used a mixed methods approach to evaluate a collaborative quality improvement (QI) model in 6 Chicago Federally Qualified Health Centers (FQHCs) that implemented workflows optimizing care continuity in the extended postpartum period for high-risk prenatal patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Quality Improvement Learning Collaborative focused on the implementation of a registry of high-risk prenatal patients to link them to primary care and was implemented in 2021; study data were collected in 2021-2022. We conducted a quantitative evaluation of FQHC-reported aggregate structure, process, and outcomes data at baseline (2020) and monthly (2021). Qualitative analysis of semistructured interviews of participating FQHC staff focused on the experience of participating in the collaborative.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At baseline, none of the 6 participating FQHCs had integrated workflows connecting high-risk prenatal patients to primary care; by the end of implementation of the QI intervention, such workflows had been implemented at 19 sites across all 6 FQHCs, and 54 staff were trained in using these workflows. The share of high-risk patients transitioned to primary care within 6 months of delivery significantly increased from 25% at baseline to 72% by the end of implementation. Qualitative analysis of interviews with 11 key informants revealed buy-in, intervention flexibility, and collaboration as facilitators of successful engagement, and staffing and data infrastructure as participation barriers.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings show that a flexible and collaborative QI approach in the FQHC setting can help optimize care delivery. Future evaluations should incorporate the patient experience and patient-level data for comprehensive analysis.</p>","PeriodicalId":50973,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Family Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11233081/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Family Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.3059","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Many maternal deaths occur beyond the acute birth encounter. There are opportunities for improving maternal health outcomes through facilitated quality improvement efforts in community settings, particularly in the postpartum period. We used a mixed methods approach to evaluate a collaborative quality improvement (QI) model in 6 Chicago Federally Qualified Health Centers (FQHCs) that implemented workflows optimizing care continuity in the extended postpartum period for high-risk prenatal patients.

Methods: The Quality Improvement Learning Collaborative focused on the implementation of a registry of high-risk prenatal patients to link them to primary care and was implemented in 2021; study data were collected in 2021-2022. We conducted a quantitative evaluation of FQHC-reported aggregate structure, process, and outcomes data at baseline (2020) and monthly (2021). Qualitative analysis of semistructured interviews of participating FQHC staff focused on the experience of participating in the collaborative.

Results: At baseline, none of the 6 participating FQHCs had integrated workflows connecting high-risk prenatal patients to primary care; by the end of implementation of the QI intervention, such workflows had been implemented at 19 sites across all 6 FQHCs, and 54 staff were trained in using these workflows. The share of high-risk patients transitioned to primary care within 6 months of delivery significantly increased from 25% at baseline to 72% by the end of implementation. Qualitative analysis of interviews with 11 key informants revealed buy-in, intervention flexibility, and collaboration as facilitators of successful engagement, and staffing and data infrastructure as participation barriers.

Conclusions: Our findings show that a flexible and collaborative QI approach in the FQHC setting can help optimize care delivery. Future evaluations should incorporate the patient experience and patient-level data for comprehensive analysis.

以混合方法评估社区医疗机构优化围产期和初级保健的质量改进模式。
目的:许多孕产妇死亡发生在急性分娩期之后。在社区环境中,尤其是在产后,通过促进质量改进工作,有机会改善产妇的健康状况。我们采用混合方法对芝加哥 6 家联邦合格医疗中心(FQHC)的合作质量改进(QI)模式进行了评估,该模式实施了工作流程,优化了高风险产前患者产后延长期的护理连续性:质量改进学习合作的重点是对高危产前患者进行登记,以便将他们与初级保健联系起来,该合作于 2021 年实施;研究数据于 2021-2022 年收集。我们在基线(2020 年)和每月(2021 年)对 FQHC 报告的总体结构、过程和结果数据进行了定量评估。对参与合作的 FQHC 员工进行的半结构化访谈的定性分析侧重于参与合作的体验:基线时,6 家参与的 FQHC 都没有将高危产前患者与初级保健联系起来的综合工作流程;到实施 QI 干预结束时,6 家 FQHC 中的 19 家已实施了此类工作流程,54 名员工接受了使用这些工作流程的培训。在分娩后 6 个月内转入初级保健的高危患者比例从基线时的 25% 显著增加到实施结束时的 72%。对 11 位关键信息提供者的访谈进行的定性分析显示,认同、干预灵活性和协作是成功参与的促进因素,而人员配备和数据基础设施则是参与的障碍:我们的研究结果表明,在 FQHC 环境中采用灵活协作的 QI 方法有助于优化医疗服务。未来的评估应结合患者体验和患者层面的数据进行综合分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Annals of Family Medicine
Annals of Family Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
4.50%
发文量
142
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Annals of Family Medicine is a peer-reviewed research journal to meet the needs of scientists, practitioners, policymakers, and the patients and communities they serve.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信