Diagnostic performance of sonography in penetrating torso trauma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Mohammad Amin Ashoobi, Enayatollah Homaie Rad, Rayehe Rahimi
{"title":"Diagnostic performance of sonography in penetrating torso trauma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Mohammad Amin Ashoobi, Enayatollah Homaie Rad, Rayehe Rahimi","doi":"10.1007/s00068-024-02446-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This systematic review investigates the diagnostic value of ultrasound in the evaluation of torso injuries following a penetrating trauma.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched PubMed, Scopus, and WOS databases for related original articles until May 7, 2023, and extracted data related to diagnostic performance. The bivariate model and hierarchic summary receiver operating characteristic (HSROC) approach were used to calculate pooled diagnostic values. Cochrane Q test and I-squared were performed to evaluate heterogeneity. We assessed heterogeneity with meta-regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventeen studies were included, which involved a total number of 1866 patients. According to meta-analysis, sonography demonstrated a pooled sensitivity of 56% (45-67%) and specificity of 96% (94-97%), positive likelihood ratio (LR +) of 13.66 (8.03-23.23), and negative likelihood ratio (LR-) of 0.45 (0.35-0.59) for detecting abdominal injuries. In pericardial penetrating trauma, pooled sensitivity was 100% (45-100%), pooled specificity was 99% (96-100%), LR + was 136.7 (24.8-752.3), and LR- was 0.00 (0.00-1.22). For thoracic penetrating trauma, pooled sensitivity was 99% (93-100%) and specificity was 100% (98-100%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Sonography demonstrated promising diagnostic value in the initial assessment of torso penetrating trauma, particularly in the thoracic and pericardial regions. However, the sensitivity of sonography is limited in abdominal penetrating trauma and a combination with other imaging modalities should be considered in these cases.</p>","PeriodicalId":12064,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"1347-1366"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-024-02446-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This systematic review investigates the diagnostic value of ultrasound in the evaluation of torso injuries following a penetrating trauma.

Methods: We searched PubMed, Scopus, and WOS databases for related original articles until May 7, 2023, and extracted data related to diagnostic performance. The bivariate model and hierarchic summary receiver operating characteristic (HSROC) approach were used to calculate pooled diagnostic values. Cochrane Q test and I-squared were performed to evaluate heterogeneity. We assessed heterogeneity with meta-regression.

Results: Seventeen studies were included, which involved a total number of 1866 patients. According to meta-analysis, sonography demonstrated a pooled sensitivity of 56% (45-67%) and specificity of 96% (94-97%), positive likelihood ratio (LR +) of 13.66 (8.03-23.23), and negative likelihood ratio (LR-) of 0.45 (0.35-0.59) for detecting abdominal injuries. In pericardial penetrating trauma, pooled sensitivity was 100% (45-100%), pooled specificity was 99% (96-100%), LR + was 136.7 (24.8-752.3), and LR- was 0.00 (0.00-1.22). For thoracic penetrating trauma, pooled sensitivity was 99% (93-100%) and specificity was 100% (98-100%).

Conclusions: Sonography demonstrated promising diagnostic value in the initial assessment of torso penetrating trauma, particularly in the thoracic and pericardial regions. However, the sensitivity of sonography is limited in abdominal penetrating trauma and a combination with other imaging modalities should be considered in these cases.

Abstract Image

穿透性躯干创伤的超声诊断性能:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
背景:本系统性综述研究了超声波在评估穿透性创伤后躯干损伤中的诊断价值:本系统综述研究了超声波在评估穿透性创伤后躯干损伤中的诊断价值:我们检索了 PubMed、Scopus 和 WOS 数据库中截至 2023 年 5 月 7 日的相关原始文章,并提取了与诊断性能相关的数据。采用双变量模型和分层汇总接收者操作特征(HSROC)方法计算汇总诊断值。采用 Cochrane Q 检验和 I 平方来评估异质性。我们用元回归评估了异质性:结果:共纳入 17 项研究,涉及 1866 名患者。根据荟萃分析,超声波检查发现腹部损伤的敏感性为56%(45-67%),特异性为96%(94-97%),阳性似然比(LR +)为13.66(8.03-23.23),阴性似然比(LR-)为0.45(0.35-0.59)。对于心包穿透性创伤,汇总灵敏度为 100%(45%-100%),汇总特异性为 99%(96%-100%),LR + 为 136.7(24.8-752.3),LR- 为 0.00(0.00-1.22)。对于胸部穿透性创伤,汇总灵敏度为 99% (93-100%),特异性为 100% (98-100%):结论:超声波检查在躯干穿透性创伤的初步评估中具有良好的诊断价值,尤其是在胸部和心包区域。然而,超声波检查对腹部穿透性创伤的灵敏度有限,在这些病例中应考虑与其他成像方式相结合。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
14.30%
发文量
311
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery aims to open an interdisciplinary forum that allows for the scientific exchange between basic and clinical science related to pathophysiology, diagnostics and treatment of traumatized patients. The journal covers all aspects of clinical management, operative treatment and related research of traumatic injuries. Clinical and experimental papers on issues relevant for the improvement of trauma care are published. Reviews, original articles, short communications and letters allow the appropriate presentation of major and minor topics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信