Property rights theory, bundles of rights on IoT data, and the EU Data Act

IF 1 3区 社会学 Q3 ECONOMICS
Martina Eckardt, Wolfgang Kerber
{"title":"Property rights theory, bundles of rights on IoT data, and the EU Data Act","authors":"Martina Eckardt, Wolfgang Kerber","doi":"10.1007/s10657-023-09791-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>With the advance of smart IoT devices (Internet of Things) the amount of valuable data will increase dramatically. With its recently enacted Data Act (DA) the EU introduces new data access and sharing rights for the users of IoT devices. This article analyzes how the DA will change the bundle of rights on non-personal IoT data regarding who can control, access, use, share, and monetize this data. In a first step, we apply the property rights theory (esp. the approach of Barzel) for explaining the status quo of IoT data governance. Here the manufacturers can get through the technical design of their IoT devices exclusive de facto control over IoT data (\"capture\" of data). In a second step, we analyze how the DA changes this de facto bundle of rights in order to unlock more IoT data for innovation, competition, and empowerment of users. Since the DA is not very clear and partly contradictory, three different concepts for the design of this bundle of rights are analyzed and compared: A data holder-centric IP-like concept, a user-centric concept, and the concept of co-generated data. The article analyzes all three concepts from an economic perspective including relevant market failures regarding IoT data in B2B and B2C contexts. For achieving the objectives of the DA, especially regarding unlocking of data for innovation, bundles of rights should be chosen which reject notions of exclusivity and enable broad access and sharing of IoT data. The enacted Data Act, which still clings too much to the exclusivity of data and includes too many hurdles for data sharing, cannot be expected to contribute much to achieving these objectives.</p>","PeriodicalId":51664,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Law and Economics","volume":"2 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Law and Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10657-023-09791-8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

With the advance of smart IoT devices (Internet of Things) the amount of valuable data will increase dramatically. With its recently enacted Data Act (DA) the EU introduces new data access and sharing rights for the users of IoT devices. This article analyzes how the DA will change the bundle of rights on non-personal IoT data regarding who can control, access, use, share, and monetize this data. In a first step, we apply the property rights theory (esp. the approach of Barzel) for explaining the status quo of IoT data governance. Here the manufacturers can get through the technical design of their IoT devices exclusive de facto control over IoT data ("capture" of data). In a second step, we analyze how the DA changes this de facto bundle of rights in order to unlock more IoT data for innovation, competition, and empowerment of users. Since the DA is not very clear and partly contradictory, three different concepts for the design of this bundle of rights are analyzed and compared: A data holder-centric IP-like concept, a user-centric concept, and the concept of co-generated data. The article analyzes all three concepts from an economic perspective including relevant market failures regarding IoT data in B2B and B2C contexts. For achieving the objectives of the DA, especially regarding unlocking of data for innovation, bundles of rights should be chosen which reject notions of exclusivity and enable broad access and sharing of IoT data. The enacted Data Act, which still clings too much to the exclusivity of data and includes too many hurdles for data sharing, cannot be expected to contribute much to achieving these objectives.

产权理论、物联网数据权利束和欧盟数据法案
随着智能物联网设备(物联网)的发展,有价值的数据量将急剧增加。欧盟最近颁布的《数据法案》(DA)为物联网设备用户引入了新的数据访问和共享权利。本文分析了《数据法案》将如何改变非个人物联网数据的权利束,即谁可以控制、访问、使用、共享这些数据并将其货币化。首先,我们运用产权理论(尤其是 Barzel 的方法)来解释物联网数据治理的现状。在这里,制造商可以通过其物联网设备的技术设计获得对物联网数据的独家实际控制权("捕获 "数据)。第二步,我们将分析 DA 如何改变这种事实上的权利捆绑,以释放更多的物联网数据,促进创新、竞争和用户赋权。由于《发展议程》并不十分明确,而且部分内容相互矛盾,因此我们分析并比较了设计这种权利束的三种不同概念:以数据持有者为中心的类似知识产权的概念、以用户为中心的概念以及共同生成数据的概念。文章从经济学角度分析了这三种概念,包括 B2B 和 B2C 物联网数据的相关市场失灵。为实现《数据保护法》的目标,特别是关于释放数据以促进创新的目标,应选择权利捆绑,摒弃排他性概念,实现物联网数据的广泛访问和共享。已颁布的《数据法》仍然过分拘泥于数据的排他性,对数据共享设置了太多障碍,因此不能指望它对实现这些目标做出多大贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
7.70%
发文量
37
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Law and Economics provides readers with high-quality theoretical and empirical research in which both the legal and economic dimensions merge and combine. The journal welcomes articles that promote a better understanding of legal phenomena, legal decisions made by judges, courts or regulatory agencies, and involving economic tools. Theoretical papers are welcome, provided they have a strong basis in law and economics. We also welcome case studies, as well as empirical analyses – including empirical legal studies – and experimental investigations. The European Journal of Law and Economics does not favor any particular topic, but does have a focus on new and emerging problems. European themes are particularly welcome, because we feel it is important to exploit Europe’s considerable institutional diversity in order to build a more robust body of theory and empirical evidence. However, the purpose of the journal is also to showcase the diversity of law and economics approaches, as supplied by an international mix of authors. Drawing on the support of respected scholars from around the world, who serve as consulting editors and editorial board members, the Editors wish to give contributing authors the opportunity to improve their papers, while also offering them a quick and efficient review process. Officially cited as: Eur J Law Econ
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信