A review on the quality of wood from agroforestry systems

IF 2 3区 农林科学 Q2 AGRONOMY
Daniela Minini, Cibelle Amaral Reis, Daiane de Moura Borges Maria, Kyvia Pontes Teixeira das Chagas, Tarcila Rosa da Silva Lins, Pedro Henrique Gonzalez de Cademartori, Graziela Baptista Vidaurre, Silvana Nisgoski
{"title":"A review on the quality of wood from agroforestry systems","authors":"Daniela Minini,&nbsp;Cibelle Amaral Reis,&nbsp;Daiane de Moura Borges Maria,&nbsp;Kyvia Pontes Teixeira das Chagas,&nbsp;Tarcila Rosa da Silva Lins,&nbsp;Pedro Henrique Gonzalez de Cademartori,&nbsp;Graziela Baptista Vidaurre,&nbsp;Silvana Nisgoski","doi":"10.1007/s10457-023-00941-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Agroforestry systems (AFS) are an established and well-documented practice with widely recognized economic, social, and ecosystem benefits. However, literature regarding their woody component analysis for wood products is still incipient. This study aimed to survey articles that report results on the quality of wood produced in agroforestry systems, identify existing knowledge gaps regarding the quality of wood from AFS and, with those results, guide new studies. A search on Scopus and Web of Science was conducted using terms related to agroforestry systems and wood quality. The findings were screened and analyzed, and the main data and wood characteristics of each fitting article were described. This review describes thirteen articles, comprising four countries (Brazil, Costa Rica, France, India and Portugal), and it discusses the properties and potential use of wood from twelve species: <i>Castanea sativa</i>, <i>Cedrela odorata</i>, <i>Eucalyptus grandis</i> × <i>Eucalyptus urophylla</i>, <i>Juglans nigra</i> ×  <i>regia</i>, <i>Khaya senegalensis</i>, <i>Parapiptadenia rigida</i>, <i>Peltophorum dubium</i>, <i>Populus deltoides</i> ×  <i>Populus tristris</i>, <i>Quercus robur</i>, <i>Quercus rotundifolia</i>, <i>Schizolobium parahyba</i> and <i>Tectona grandis</i>. Most of the woods had superior or similar characteristics to monoculture ones, except for <i>Tectona grandis</i>. The geographic distribution of those studies is limited, with no studies from Africa and Oceania, and few authors publishing on this subject. Even though AFS is a traditional agricultural practice, few studies address the quality of the wood from this system. This study gathers existing information about the quality of wood produced in AFS, highlighting the knowledge gaps on this theme and indicating improvements for future work.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7610,"journal":{"name":"Agroforestry Systems","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agroforestry Systems","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10457-023-00941-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Agroforestry systems (AFS) are an established and well-documented practice with widely recognized economic, social, and ecosystem benefits. However, literature regarding their woody component analysis for wood products is still incipient. This study aimed to survey articles that report results on the quality of wood produced in agroforestry systems, identify existing knowledge gaps regarding the quality of wood from AFS and, with those results, guide new studies. A search on Scopus and Web of Science was conducted using terms related to agroforestry systems and wood quality. The findings were screened and analyzed, and the main data and wood characteristics of each fitting article were described. This review describes thirteen articles, comprising four countries (Brazil, Costa Rica, France, India and Portugal), and it discusses the properties and potential use of wood from twelve species: Castanea sativa, Cedrela odorata, Eucalyptus grandis × Eucalyptus urophylla, Juglans nigra ×  regia, Khaya senegalensis, Parapiptadenia rigida, Peltophorum dubium, Populus deltoides ×  Populus tristris, Quercus robur, Quercus rotundifolia, Schizolobium parahyba and Tectona grandis. Most of the woods had superior or similar characteristics to monoculture ones, except for Tectona grandis. The geographic distribution of those studies is limited, with no studies from Africa and Oceania, and few authors publishing on this subject. Even though AFS is a traditional agricultural practice, few studies address the quality of the wood from this system. This study gathers existing information about the quality of wood produced in AFS, highlighting the knowledge gaps on this theme and indicating improvements for future work.

Abstract Image

农林系统木材质量综述
农林系统(AFS)是一种成熟的、有据可查的做法,其经济、社会和生态系统效益得到广泛认可。然而,有关其木材产品木质成分分析的文献仍处于起步阶段。本研究旨在调查报告农林系统生产的木材质量结果的文章,找出有关农林系统木材质量的现有知识差距,并根据这些结果指导新的研究。我们使用与农林系统和木材质量相关的术语在 Scopus 和 Web of Science 上进行了搜索。对研究结果进行了筛选和分析,并对每篇相关文章的主要数据和木材特征进行了描述。本综述介绍了包括四个国家(巴西、哥斯达黎加、法国、印度和葡萄牙)在内的十三篇文章,讨论了十二种木材的特性和潜在用途:这些木材来自以下 12 个树种:Castanea sativa、Cedrela odorata、Eucalyptus grandis × Eucalyptus urophylla、Juglans nigra × regia、Khaya senegalensis、Parapiptadenia rigida、Peltophorum dubium、Populus deltoides × Populus tristris、Quercus robur、Quercus rotundifolia、Schizolobium parahyba 和 Tectona grandis。除桤木外,大多数木材都具有优于或类似于单一栽培木材的特性。这些研究的地理分布很有限,没有来自非洲和大洋洲的研究,而且很少有作者发表过这方面的论文。尽管 AFS 是一种传统的农业耕作方式,但很少有研究涉及这种方式所产木材的质量。本研究收集了有关非洲林业生产的木材质量的现有信息,强调了在这一主题上的知识差距,并指出了未来工作的改进方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Agroforestry Systems
Agroforestry Systems 农林科学-林学
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
9.10%
发文量
78
审稿时长
4.5 months
期刊介绍: Agroforestry Systems is an international scientific journal that publishes results of novel, high impact original research, critical reviews and short communications on any aspect of agroforestry. The journal particularly encourages contributions that demonstrate the role of agroforestry in providing commodity as well non-commodity benefits such as ecosystem services. Papers dealing with both biophysical and socioeconomic aspects are welcome. These include results of investigations of a fundamental or applied nature dealing with integrated systems involving trees and crops and/or livestock. Manuscripts that are purely descriptive in nature or confirmatory in nature of well-established findings, and with limited international scope are discouraged. To be acceptable for publication, the information presented must be relevant to a context wider than the specific location where the study was undertaken, and provide new insight or make a significant contribution to the agroforestry knowledge base
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信