Breathing and Speech Adaptation: Do Speakers Adapt Toward a Confederate Talking Under Physical Effort?

IF 2.2 2区 医学 Q1 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY
Tom Offrede, Christine Mooshammer, Susanne Fuchs
{"title":"Breathing and Speech Adaptation: Do Speakers Adapt Toward a Confederate Talking Under Physical Effort?","authors":"Tom Offrede, Christine Mooshammer, Susanne Fuchs","doi":"10.1044/2023_JSLHR-23-00113","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study investigated whether speakers adapt their breathing and speech (fundamental frequency [<i>f</i><sub>o</sub>]) to a prerecorded confederate who is sitting or moving under different levels of physical effort and who is either speaking or not. Following Paccalin and Jeannerod (2000), we would expect breathing rate to change in the direction of the confederate's, even if the participant is physically inactive. This might in turn affect their speech acoustics.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We recorded the speech and respiration of 22 native German speakers. They produced solo and synchronous read speech in interaction with a confederate who appeared on a prerecorded video. There were three within-subject experimental conditions: the confederate (a) sitting, (b) biking with light effort, or (c) biking with heavier effort.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During speech, the confederate's inhalation amplitude and <i>f</i><sub>o</sub> increased with physical effort, as expected. Her breath cycle duration changed differently, probably because of read speech constraints. Overall, the only adaptation the participants showed was higher <i>f</i><sub>o</sub> with increase in the confederate's physical effort during synchronous, but not solo, speech. Additionally, they produced shallower inhalations when observing the confederate biking in silence, as compared to the condition without movement. Crucially, the participants' acoustic and breathing data showed large interindividual variability.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings indicate that, in this paradigm, convergence only took place on <i>f</i><sub>o</sub> during synchronous speech and that this phonetic adaptation happened independently from any speech breathing adaptation. It also suggests that participants may adapt their quiet breathing while watching a person performing physical exercise but that the mechanism is more complex than that explained previously.</p>","PeriodicalId":51254,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research","volume":" ","pages":"3914-3930"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1044/2023_JSLHR-23-00113","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This study investigated whether speakers adapt their breathing and speech (fundamental frequency [fo]) to a prerecorded confederate who is sitting or moving under different levels of physical effort and who is either speaking or not. Following Paccalin and Jeannerod (2000), we would expect breathing rate to change in the direction of the confederate's, even if the participant is physically inactive. This might in turn affect their speech acoustics.

Method: We recorded the speech and respiration of 22 native German speakers. They produced solo and synchronous read speech in interaction with a confederate who appeared on a prerecorded video. There were three within-subject experimental conditions: the confederate (a) sitting, (b) biking with light effort, or (c) biking with heavier effort.

Results: During speech, the confederate's inhalation amplitude and fo increased with physical effort, as expected. Her breath cycle duration changed differently, probably because of read speech constraints. Overall, the only adaptation the participants showed was higher fo with increase in the confederate's physical effort during synchronous, but not solo, speech. Additionally, they produced shallower inhalations when observing the confederate biking in silence, as compared to the condition without movement. Crucially, the participants' acoustic and breathing data showed large interindividual variability.

Conclusions: Our findings indicate that, in this paradigm, convergence only took place on fo during synchronous speech and that this phonetic adaptation happened independently from any speech breathing adaptation. It also suggests that participants may adapt their quiet breathing while watching a person performing physical exercise but that the mechanism is more complex than that explained previously.

呼吸与演讲适应:演讲者是否会在体力消耗下适应邦联式说话?
研究目的:本研究调查了说话者是否会根据预先录制的、在不同体力水平下坐着或移动的、说话或不说话的对方来调整自己的呼吸和语音(基频 [fo])。根据 Paccalin 和 Jeannerod(2000 年)的研究,我们预计即使被试身体不活动,呼吸频率也会朝着对方的方向变化。这可能会反过来影响他们的语音声学:我们记录了 22 位以德语为母语的人的语音和呼吸。方法:我们录制了 22 位以德语为母语的人的语音和呼吸,他们与一位出现在事先录制好的视频中的同声传译者进行了独读和同步朗读。受试者内部有三种实验条件:共知者(a)坐着,(b)轻力骑车,或(c)重力骑车:结果:在说话过程中,如预期的那样,对话者的吸气幅度和泡沫随着体力的增加而增加。她的呼吸周期持续时间发生了不同的变化,这可能是由于阅读语音的限制。总体而言,参与者表现出的唯一适应是,在同步讲话时,随着对方体力的增加,fo 也随之增加,而不是单独讲话时。此外,与没有动作的情况相比,当观察到共鸣者在沉默中骑车时,他们的吸气较浅。最重要的是,参与者的声音和呼吸数据显示出很大的个体差异:我们的研究结果表明,在这一范例中,只有在同步言语时才会出现发声聚合,而且这种语音适应是独立于任何言语呼吸适应的。我们的研究结果还表明,在观看一个人进行体育锻炼时,参与者可能会调整自己的安静呼吸,但这一机制比之前的解释更为复杂。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research
Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY-REHABILITATION
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
19.20%
发文量
538
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Mission: JSLHR publishes peer-reviewed research and other scholarly articles on the normal and disordered processes in speech, language, hearing, and related areas such as cognition, oral-motor function, and swallowing. The journal is an international outlet for both basic research on communication processes and clinical research pertaining to screening, diagnosis, and management of communication disorders as well as the etiologies and characteristics of these disorders. JSLHR seeks to advance evidence-based practice by disseminating the results of new studies as well as providing a forum for critical reviews and meta-analyses of previously published work. Scope: The broad field of communication sciences and disorders, including speech production and perception; anatomy and physiology of speech and voice; genetics, biomechanics, and other basic sciences pertaining to human communication; mastication and swallowing; speech disorders; voice disorders; development of speech, language, or hearing in children; normal language processes; language disorders; disorders of hearing and balance; psychoacoustics; and anatomy and physiology of hearing.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信