Concerns about the histological assessment in a mouse model of human celiac disease

IF 4.1 4区 医学 Q2 IMMUNOLOGY
Tobias L. Freitag, Leif C. Andersson, Anja Kipar
{"title":"Concerns about the histological assessment in a mouse model of human celiac disease","authors":"Tobias L. Freitag, Leif C. Andersson, Anja Kipar","doi":"10.1111/sji.13351","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Celiac disease (CD) is a common immune-mediated, gluten-sensitive enteropathy that develops in human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-DQ2 or HLA-DQ8 allele carriers due to the dysregulation of gluten-specific T helper cells. Although ingested gluten from cereals was identified as the disease driver in the 1950s, the ultimate cause (or disease trigger) remains unknown. CD is further characterized by the production by intestinal B cells of autoantibodies against tissue transglutaminase 2, an enzyme that can modify gluten peptides by deamidation, thus rendering gluten more recognizable for celiac patient T cells. The celiac intestinal lesion is hallmarked by crypt hyperplasia and villus atrophy, but also by intraepithelial T cells and lamina propria plasma cell infiltration.<span><sup>1, 2</sup></span></p>\n<p>So far, an accurate CD model in rodents that would unite the features listed above does not exist.<span><sup>3</sup></span> HLA-DQ2 or HLA-DQ8 transgenic, mouse class II knockout models provide appropriate restriction of T helper cells, valuable for the experimental study of cellular and humoral immune responses directed at gluten. But HLA-transgenic mice do not develop disease on gluten-containing diet, or following various additional challenges, while any histological changes in the intestine remain mild and rudimentary.<span><sup>4-7</sup></span> In contrast, Rag1<sup>−/−</sup> mice adoptively transferred with gliadin memory T cells have been described as a CD model with an intestinal phenotype that includes villus atrophy, crypt hyperplasia and mucosal mononuclear cell infiltration.<span><sup>8</sup></span> However, the gluten-sensitive enteropathy in this model depends on the quantitative depletion of regulatory T cells. Consequently, negative control mice on gluten-free diet also show mild-to-moderate (autoimmune) enteropathy.</p>\n<p>In-depth histological analyses are vital for the development of animal models of human diseases. Since CD primarily affects the proximal small intestine, and is characterized by well-documented histological changes,<span><sup>2</sup></span> thorough histological investigation of at least the entire small intestine, that is, duodenum, jejunum and ileum, is key for the validation of any animal model of human CD.<span><sup>3</sup></span> Non-validated surrogate biomarkers such as immune mediators or anti-gliadin antibodies cannot replace histological parameters. The assessment of architectural changes in the small intestine forms an important part of the histological analysis in CD and its animal models. However, it is well known that villus/crypt (V/C) ratios are notoriously unreliable as sole parameters of intestinal damage for various reasons; they are affected by diets, the age of the animal, and location in the intestinal compartment, as well as technical issues, for example, sampling consistency,<span><sup>9</sup></span> tissue orientation<span><sup>10</sup></span> or compression by luminal content. Intraepithelial lymphocyte (IEL) counts may be used to quantify mucosal cell-mediated immune reactions, but they correlate poorly with villus damage in mice.<span><sup>11</sup></span> For all these reasons, it is good practice in experimental gastroenterological research to present integrative histopathological scores and to assess the inflammatory infiltrates in detail,<span><sup>8, 12, 13</sup></span> ideally making use of unbiassed quantitative approaches. Finally, intestinal damage is associated with overt degenerative changes, cell loss through apoptosis or necrosis, and/or changes in the mitotic rate. Their assessment can further inform the study.</p>\n<p>Abadie et al., in their original article published in 2020 in <i>Nature</i>,<span><sup>14</sup></span> proposed a model for human CD in which overexpression of IL-15 in the intestinal epithelium combined with CD4+ T-cell immunity directed against gluten leads to an activated killer cell phenotype of intestinal intraepithelial CD8+ T cells and villus destruction. To test this hypothesis, the authors used mice characterized by IL-15 transgene overexpression in the intestinal mucosa (under both the villin<span><sup>15</sup></span> and MHC class I Dd promotors<span><sup>16</sup></span>). They showed that gluten feeding of HLA-DQ8, Dd-villin-IL-15 transgenic mice leads to the development of an adaptive T helper 1 (Th1) cell-mediated immune response directed against gluten, and upregulation in the ileum of markers of cytotoxic IEL, such as perforin 1, granzyme B and activating natural killer receptor NKG2D. These findings were interesting, because in wild-type mice, feeding of gluten alone does not induce a Th1/cytotoxic immune response or mucosal damage. It is hence even more surprising that Abadie et al.<span><sup>14</sup></span> reported ileal damage in their mouse model and claimed it to be dependent on (1) oral gluten feeding, (2) CD-associated HLA-DQ8 co-transgenic expression and (3) tissue transglutaminase activity.</p>\n<p>Previous studies have shown that the overexpression of IL-15 in the intestinal epithelium under the non-classical MHC class I T3b promotor leads to the spontaneous development of severe inflammation of the small intestine in adult mice.<span><sup>17</sup></span> In addition, overexpression of IL-15 under the Dd promotor, as in the study by Abadie et al.,<span><sup>16</sup></span> has been shown to manifest with multiorgan lymphocytic infiltration. These pathological changes occurred in the absence of any additional dietary or genetic manipulations and were therefore considered a direct result of IL-15 overexpression.</p>\n<p>To support the sweeping claim that IL-15 transgenic mice represent a model with CD-like histological changes depending on the combination of oral gluten challenge, the HLA-DQ8 risk allele and tissue transglutaminase activity, Abadie et al. relied exclusively on the semiquantitative assessment of IEL counts and V/C ratios in the ileum. They did neither assess inflammatory infiltrates nor did they present histopathological scores, thereby ignoring common practice in the field.<span><sup>13</sup></span> Clinical or functional parameters such as body weight development or intestinal permeability were also not analysed. Moreover, the authors did not provide any rationale for the unusual choice of the ileum as the sole site for the histological assessment. This is surprising not only because the ileum is less frequently affected in CD than the proximal small intestine, but also because the villus length decreases from duodenum to ileum in mice.<span><sup>9, 13, 18</sup></span> Hence, the choice of the mouse ileum, where villi are physiologically short, as the site for the assessment by V/C ratio of treatment- or transgene-induced pathological changes is inappropriate. In addition, it is noted that in several figures the authors showed ileal cross sections where the villi are compressed by intestinal content (most clearly in figures 3g and 4b). These shortcomings invalidate the reported villus length measurements and V/C ratios.</p>\n<p>It is a further concern that Abadie et al.<span><sup>14</sup></span> did not provide any information on their sampling approach. To distinguish the ileum from the jejunum in cross-sections, mouse pathologists follow strict standard procedures and generally sample the ileum 1 cm proximal to the cecum.<span><sup>19</sup></span> The histology panel in figure 1b shows three small intestinal cross sections, with only the middle (gluten) one providing clear evidence of two serosal attachments; this raises doubts that the left and right images show ileum at all. To specify, the terminal ileum has two serosal attachments, the mesentery and the ileocecal fold, whereas the jejunum only has the mesentery.<span><sup>18</sup></span> Not only did these inconsistencies render the basis for histological comparisons in the report by Abadie et al. unreliable, the presented differences in ileal IEL counts and V/C ratios between experimental mice and controls are also very modest (figure 1b, 3a,b, 4b). Given the limitations highlighted above, their meaning and relevance remain completely unclear.</p>\n<p>Finally, Abadie et al.<span><sup>14</sup></span> used MHC class II (I-A<sup>b</sup>) competent HLA-DQ8 transgenic mice in their study. Concerning the claim that the described changes in the ileum are dependent on HLA-DQ8 transgene expression, it is premature to conclude that HLA-DQ8 is functional in the presence of mouse MHC class II, and that HLA transgene expression would lead to the recruitment of DQ8-restricted CD4+ T cells in this model. The authors do not provide any evidence of CD4+ T cell HLA-DQ8 restriction.</p>\n<p>Following the original article<span><sup>14</sup></span> and our letter to <i>Nature</i> raising our concerns that the journal rejected in 2020, the authors have recently published a detailed protocol for the use of the same model in <i>Current Protocols</i>.<span><sup>20</sup></span> Here, they specifically instruct the reader to (1) empty the bowel before tissue fixation and (2) sample the distal ileum 0.5 cm proximal from the cecum, two standards to which the original publication evidently did not adhere. The protocol also includes a method for BrdU staining of proliferative intestinal crypt cells, not used as a readout in the original publication.<span><sup>14</sup></span> To illustrate this staining method, the authors now show images from the proximal small intestine (location not specified; figure 3). And like in their original article, they state prematurely that they observe differences as a result of gluten challenge in the model, this time in the BrdU staining patterns, without providing or having earlier provided for review an appropriate histological analysis of the full intestine.</p>\n<p>In summary, the histopathological changes in the ileum of HLA-DQ8, Dd-villin-IL-15 transgenic mice presented by Abadie et al.<span><sup>14</sup></span> are mild to moderate at best, without clear evidence of villus atrophy, crypt hyperplasia or inflammation, and without evidence that they do not represent a direct effect of overexpression of IL-15 in the intestine. Crucial information in particular on the involvement of the duodenum and jejunum, and on the ileal dissection and sampling approach is lacking from the original study. The article provides no reliable evidence that the claimed histopathological changes are caused by gluten feeding, would be linked to HLA-DQ8 restriction of CD4+ T cells, and/or depend on tissue transglutaminase activity. The method paper<span><sup>20</sup></span> does not provide any validation of the original findings. Therefore, both reports by Abadie et al. fall short of their central claims. To convince the reader, these studies would have required an appropriate and much more thorough morphological investigation.</p>","PeriodicalId":21493,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Immunology","volume":"2615 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of Immunology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/sji.13351","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Celiac disease (CD) is a common immune-mediated, gluten-sensitive enteropathy that develops in human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-DQ2 or HLA-DQ8 allele carriers due to the dysregulation of gluten-specific T helper cells. Although ingested gluten from cereals was identified as the disease driver in the 1950s, the ultimate cause (or disease trigger) remains unknown. CD is further characterized by the production by intestinal B cells of autoantibodies against tissue transglutaminase 2, an enzyme that can modify gluten peptides by deamidation, thus rendering gluten more recognizable for celiac patient T cells. The celiac intestinal lesion is hallmarked by crypt hyperplasia and villus atrophy, but also by intraepithelial T cells and lamina propria plasma cell infiltration.1, 2

So far, an accurate CD model in rodents that would unite the features listed above does not exist.3 HLA-DQ2 or HLA-DQ8 transgenic, mouse class II knockout models provide appropriate restriction of T helper cells, valuable for the experimental study of cellular and humoral immune responses directed at gluten. But HLA-transgenic mice do not develop disease on gluten-containing diet, or following various additional challenges, while any histological changes in the intestine remain mild and rudimentary.4-7 In contrast, Rag1−/− mice adoptively transferred with gliadin memory T cells have been described as a CD model with an intestinal phenotype that includes villus atrophy, crypt hyperplasia and mucosal mononuclear cell infiltration.8 However, the gluten-sensitive enteropathy in this model depends on the quantitative depletion of regulatory T cells. Consequently, negative control mice on gluten-free diet also show mild-to-moderate (autoimmune) enteropathy.

In-depth histological analyses are vital for the development of animal models of human diseases. Since CD primarily affects the proximal small intestine, and is characterized by well-documented histological changes,2 thorough histological investigation of at least the entire small intestine, that is, duodenum, jejunum and ileum, is key for the validation of any animal model of human CD.3 Non-validated surrogate biomarkers such as immune mediators or anti-gliadin antibodies cannot replace histological parameters. The assessment of architectural changes in the small intestine forms an important part of the histological analysis in CD and its animal models. However, it is well known that villus/crypt (V/C) ratios are notoriously unreliable as sole parameters of intestinal damage for various reasons; they are affected by diets, the age of the animal, and location in the intestinal compartment, as well as technical issues, for example, sampling consistency,9 tissue orientation10 or compression by luminal content. Intraepithelial lymphocyte (IEL) counts may be used to quantify mucosal cell-mediated immune reactions, but they correlate poorly with villus damage in mice.11 For all these reasons, it is good practice in experimental gastroenterological research to present integrative histopathological scores and to assess the inflammatory infiltrates in detail,8, 12, 13 ideally making use of unbiassed quantitative approaches. Finally, intestinal damage is associated with overt degenerative changes, cell loss through apoptosis or necrosis, and/or changes in the mitotic rate. Their assessment can further inform the study.

Abadie et al., in their original article published in 2020 in Nature,14 proposed a model for human CD in which overexpression of IL-15 in the intestinal epithelium combined with CD4+ T-cell immunity directed against gluten leads to an activated killer cell phenotype of intestinal intraepithelial CD8+ T cells and villus destruction. To test this hypothesis, the authors used mice characterized by IL-15 transgene overexpression in the intestinal mucosa (under both the villin15 and MHC class I Dd promotors16). They showed that gluten feeding of HLA-DQ8, Dd-villin-IL-15 transgenic mice leads to the development of an adaptive T helper 1 (Th1) cell-mediated immune response directed against gluten, and upregulation in the ileum of markers of cytotoxic IEL, such as perforin 1, granzyme B and activating natural killer receptor NKG2D. These findings were interesting, because in wild-type mice, feeding of gluten alone does not induce a Th1/cytotoxic immune response or mucosal damage. It is hence even more surprising that Abadie et al.14 reported ileal damage in their mouse model and claimed it to be dependent on (1) oral gluten feeding, (2) CD-associated HLA-DQ8 co-transgenic expression and (3) tissue transglutaminase activity.

Previous studies have shown that the overexpression of IL-15 in the intestinal epithelium under the non-classical MHC class I T3b promotor leads to the spontaneous development of severe inflammation of the small intestine in adult mice.17 In addition, overexpression of IL-15 under the Dd promotor, as in the study by Abadie et al.,16 has been shown to manifest with multiorgan lymphocytic infiltration. These pathological changes occurred in the absence of any additional dietary or genetic manipulations and were therefore considered a direct result of IL-15 overexpression.

To support the sweeping claim that IL-15 transgenic mice represent a model with CD-like histological changes depending on the combination of oral gluten challenge, the HLA-DQ8 risk allele and tissue transglutaminase activity, Abadie et al. relied exclusively on the semiquantitative assessment of IEL counts and V/C ratios in the ileum. They did neither assess inflammatory infiltrates nor did they present histopathological scores, thereby ignoring common practice in the field.13 Clinical or functional parameters such as body weight development or intestinal permeability were also not analysed. Moreover, the authors did not provide any rationale for the unusual choice of the ileum as the sole site for the histological assessment. This is surprising not only because the ileum is less frequently affected in CD than the proximal small intestine, but also because the villus length decreases from duodenum to ileum in mice.9, 13, 18 Hence, the choice of the mouse ileum, where villi are physiologically short, as the site for the assessment by V/C ratio of treatment- or transgene-induced pathological changes is inappropriate. In addition, it is noted that in several figures the authors showed ileal cross sections where the villi are compressed by intestinal content (most clearly in figures 3g and 4b). These shortcomings invalidate the reported villus length measurements and V/C ratios.

It is a further concern that Abadie et al.14 did not provide any information on their sampling approach. To distinguish the ileum from the jejunum in cross-sections, mouse pathologists follow strict standard procedures and generally sample the ileum 1 cm proximal to the cecum.19 The histology panel in figure 1b shows three small intestinal cross sections, with only the middle (gluten) one providing clear evidence of two serosal attachments; this raises doubts that the left and right images show ileum at all. To specify, the terminal ileum has two serosal attachments, the mesentery and the ileocecal fold, whereas the jejunum only has the mesentery.18 Not only did these inconsistencies render the basis for histological comparisons in the report by Abadie et al. unreliable, the presented differences in ileal IEL counts and V/C ratios between experimental mice and controls are also very modest (figure 1b, 3a,b, 4b). Given the limitations highlighted above, their meaning and relevance remain completely unclear.

Finally, Abadie et al.14 used MHC class II (I-Ab) competent HLA-DQ8 transgenic mice in their study. Concerning the claim that the described changes in the ileum are dependent on HLA-DQ8 transgene expression, it is premature to conclude that HLA-DQ8 is functional in the presence of mouse MHC class II, and that HLA transgene expression would lead to the recruitment of DQ8-restricted CD4+ T cells in this model. The authors do not provide any evidence of CD4+ T cell HLA-DQ8 restriction.

Following the original article14 and our letter to Nature raising our concerns that the journal rejected in 2020, the authors have recently published a detailed protocol for the use of the same model in Current Protocols.20 Here, they specifically instruct the reader to (1) empty the bowel before tissue fixation and (2) sample the distal ileum 0.5 cm proximal from the cecum, two standards to which the original publication evidently did not adhere. The protocol also includes a method for BrdU staining of proliferative intestinal crypt cells, not used as a readout in the original publication.14 To illustrate this staining method, the authors now show images from the proximal small intestine (location not specified; figure 3). And like in their original article, they state prematurely that they observe differences as a result of gluten challenge in the model, this time in the BrdU staining patterns, without providing or having earlier provided for review an appropriate histological analysis of the full intestine.

In summary, the histopathological changes in the ileum of HLA-DQ8, Dd-villin-IL-15 transgenic mice presented by Abadie et al.14 are mild to moderate at best, without clear evidence of villus atrophy, crypt hyperplasia or inflammation, and without evidence that they do not represent a direct effect of overexpression of IL-15 in the intestine. Crucial information in particular on the involvement of the duodenum and jejunum, and on the ileal dissection and sampling approach is lacking from the original study. The article provides no reliable evidence that the claimed histopathological changes are caused by gluten feeding, would be linked to HLA-DQ8 restriction of CD4+ T cells, and/or depend on tissue transglutaminase activity. The method paper20 does not provide any validation of the original findings. Therefore, both reports by Abadie et al. fall short of their central claims. To convince the reader, these studies would have required an appropriate and much more thorough morphological investigation.

对人类乳糜泻小鼠模型组织学评估的担忧
16已被证明表现为多器官淋巴细胞浸润。为了支持IL-15转基因小鼠代表了一种具有CD样组织学变化的模型,这种变化取决于口服麸质挑战、HLA-DQ8风险等位基因和组织转谷氨酰胺酶活性的组合,Abadie等人完全依赖于对回肠中IEL计数和V/C比值的半定量评估。他们既没有评估炎症浸润,也没有提供组织病理学评分,因此忽略了该领域的常见做法13 。此外,作者也没有说明为何不同寻常地选择回肠作为组织学评估的唯一部位。这令人惊讶,不仅因为与近端小肠相比,回肠在 CD 中受影响的频率较低,而且因为小鼠的绒毛长度从十二指肠到回肠依次递减。此外,我们还注意到,在几幅图中,作者展示的回肠横截面上的绒毛被肠内容物压迫(图 3g 和图 4b 中最为明显)。阿巴迪等人14 没有提供任何有关其取样方法的信息,这也令人担忧。为了在横切面上区分回肠和空肠,小鼠病理学家遵循严格的标准程序,通常在盲肠近端 1 厘米处取样。19 图 1b 中的组织学面板显示了三个小肠横切面,其中只有中间(麸皮)的横切面有两个浆膜附着的明显证据;这让人怀疑左右两幅图像是否显示了回肠。18 这些不一致不仅使阿巴迪等人报告中的组织学比较基础变得不可靠,而且实验小鼠和对照组之间回肠 IEL 数量和 V/C 比值的差异也非常小(图 1b、3a,b 和 4b)。最后,Abadie 等人14 在研究中使用了具有 MHC II 类(I-Ab)能力的 HLA-DQ8 转基因小鼠。关于所描述的回肠变化依赖于 HLA-DQ8 转基因表达的说法,得出 HLA-DQ8 在小鼠 MHC II 类存在时具有功能性,以及 HLA 转基因表达会导致该模型中 DQ8 限制性 CD4+ T 细胞招募的结论还为时过早。作者没有提供任何 CD4+ T 细胞受 HLA-DQ8 限制的证据。继最初的文章14 和我们致信《自然》杂志提出我们的担忧(该杂志于 2020 年拒绝了我们的担忧)之后,作者最近在《当前方案》20 上发表了使用同一模型的详细方案。在这里,他们特别指示读者:(1) 在组织固定前清空肠道;(2) 在距盲肠 0.5 厘米近端取样回肠远端,而最初发表的文章显然没有遵守这两个标准。14 为了说明这种染色方法,作者现在展示了近端小肠的图像(位置未注明;图 3)。与最初的文章一样,他们过早地指出,他们观察到了模型中麸质挑战导致的差异,这次是在 BrdU 染色模式上的差异,但没有提供或早些时候提供了完整肠道的适当组织学分析以供审阅。Abadie 等人 14 提出的 HLA-DQ8、Dd-villin-IL-15 转基因小鼠回肠组织病理学变化充其量只是轻度至中度变化,没有绒毛萎缩、隐窝增生或炎症的明确证据,也没有证据表明这些变化不是肠道中 IL-15 过度表达的直接影响。原始研究缺乏关键信息,特别是关于十二指肠和空肠的参与情况以及回肠解剖和取样方法的信息。文章没有提供可靠的证据证明所声称的组织病理学变化是由摄入麸质引起的,与 CD4+ T 细胞的 HLA-DQ8 限制有关,和/或取决于组织转谷氨酰胺酶的活性。该方法论文20 没有对原始研究结果进行任何验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
5.40%
发文量
109
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: This peer-reviewed international journal publishes original articles and reviews on all aspects of basic, translational and clinical immunology. The journal aims to provide high quality service to authors, and high quality articles for readers. The journal accepts for publication material from investigators all over the world, which makes a significant contribution to basic, translational and clinical immunology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信