Inclusive education, gender inequality and public expenditure in sub-Saharan Africa

IF 2.7 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Yérim Codé Mbodji
{"title":"Inclusive education, gender inequality and public expenditure in sub-Saharan Africa","authors":"Yérim Codé Mbodji","doi":"10.1002/rev3.3452","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the contemporary literature, several studies have attempted to see the effect of gender inequality and public expenditure on inclusive education. However, few have attempted to determine the gender inequality threshold. In this study, we first examined the threshold of gender inequality which, when exceeded, the effect on inclusive education becomes negative. Second, we examined the effect of public expenditure on inclusive education in 17 countries in sub-Saharan Africa, in the period from 2000 to 2019. The fixed-effect panel data model was used. The following results have been established: (i) the gender inequality threshold from which the effect of gender inequality becomes negative on the gross enrolment rate is respectively established at 0.38 in primary and 0.37 in secondary. At the higher level, the effect of gender inequality is linear and negative on the gross enrolment rate; (ii) public expenditure on education has a positive and significant effect at the primary and secondary level on inclusive education. However, its effect at the higher level is negative. As implications, the results constitute and intermediate objective for the countries for the sub-Saharan Africa which failing to achieve gender equality, would benefit from reducing inequality to 0.38 at primary level and 0.37 at secondary level. Secondary, education in order to cancel out the negative effect of gender inequality on gross enrolment rates at the primary and secondary level. Secondly, states must further consider public education expenditure as a relevant instrument for achieving SDG 4.","PeriodicalId":45076,"journal":{"name":"Review of Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Review of Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/rev3.3452","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the contemporary literature, several studies have attempted to see the effect of gender inequality and public expenditure on inclusive education. However, few have attempted to determine the gender inequality threshold. In this study, we first examined the threshold of gender inequality which, when exceeded, the effect on inclusive education becomes negative. Second, we examined the effect of public expenditure on inclusive education in 17 countries in sub-Saharan Africa, in the period from 2000 to 2019. The fixed-effect panel data model was used. The following results have been established: (i) the gender inequality threshold from which the effect of gender inequality becomes negative on the gross enrolment rate is respectively established at 0.38 in primary and 0.37 in secondary. At the higher level, the effect of gender inequality is linear and negative on the gross enrolment rate; (ii) public expenditure on education has a positive and significant effect at the primary and secondary level on inclusive education. However, its effect at the higher level is negative. As implications, the results constitute and intermediate objective for the countries for the sub-Saharan Africa which failing to achieve gender equality, would benefit from reducing inequality to 0.38 at primary level and 0.37 at secondary level. Secondary, education in order to cancel out the negative effect of gender inequality on gross enrolment rates at the primary and secondary level. Secondly, states must further consider public education expenditure as a relevant instrument for achieving SDG 4.
撒哈拉以南非洲的全纳教育、性别不平等和公共开支
在当代文献中,有几项研究试图探讨性别不平等和公共开支对全纳教育的影响。然而,很少有人试图确定性别不平等的临界值。在本研究中,我们首先考察了性别不平等的临界值,一旦超过这个临界值,对全纳教育的影响就会变成负值。其次,我们考察了 2000 年至 2019 年期间撒哈拉以南非洲 17 个国家的公共支出对全纳教育的影响。我们采用了固定效应面板数据模型。研究结果如下:(i) 性别不平等对毛入学率的影响从 0.38(小学)和 0.37(中学)开始,分别确定为性别不平等阈值。在更高层次上,性别不平等对毛入学率的影响是线性和负向的;(ii) 在小学和中学阶段,教育公共支出对全纳教育有积极和显著的影响。但是,在更高层次上,其影响为负。作为影响,这些结果构成了撒哈拉以南非洲国家的中期目标,这些国家未能实现性别平等,如果能将初等教育中的不平等程度降低到 0.38,中等教育中的不平等程度降低到 0.37,它们将从中受益。为了抵消性别不平等对小学和中学毛入学率的负面影响,各国必须进一步考虑公共教育和中 学教育中的性别不平等问题。其次,各州必须进一步考虑将公共教育支出作为实现可持续发展目标 4 的相关工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Review of Education
Review of Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
8.30%
发文量
63
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信