Effects of In-Vehicle Touchscreen Location on Driver Task Performance, Eye Gaze Behavior, and Workload During Conditionally Automated Driving: Nondriving-Related Task and Take-Over.

IF 2.9 3区 心理学 Q1 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Human Factors Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-01-19 DOI:10.1177/00187208241226838
Gayoung Ban, Woojin Park
{"title":"Effects of In-Vehicle Touchscreen Location on Driver Task Performance, Eye Gaze Behavior, and Workload During Conditionally Automated Driving: Nondriving-Related Task and Take-Over.","authors":"Gayoung Ban, Woojin Park","doi":"10.1177/00187208241226838","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study investigated the effects of nondriving-related task (NDRT) touchscreen location and NDRT difficulty level on the driver task performance, eye gaze behavior, and workload during SAE Level 3 conditionally automated driving. Two driver tasks were considered: a visuomanual NDRT and a take-over task.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>Touchscreens are expected to play important roles inside automated vehicles. However, few studies have investigated the driver-touchscreen interaction during automated driving.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A driving simulator experiment was conducted. The experimental task consisted of two successive subtasks: an NDRT followed by a take-over task. NDRT touchscreen location (Upper Left, Upper Right, and Lower Right) and NDRT difficulty level (Easy and Hard) were the independent variables. A set of driver task performance, eye gaze behavior, and perceived workload measures were employed for each subtask as the dependent variables.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>NDRT touchscreen location significantly affected both the NDRT and the take-over task performance. Lower Right was superior to Upper Right in the NDRT performance but was inferior in the take-over task performance. NDRT touchscreen location affected the perceived physical workload of the NDRT. NDRT difficulty level affected the perceived workload of the take-over task.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The research findings enhance our understanding of how NDRT touchscreen location and NDRT difficulty level impact the driver task performance during conditionally automated driving, and, further provide useful design implications and knowledge.</p><p><strong>Application: </strong>The study results would inform the NDRT touchscreen interface design and the NDRT design for conditionally automated vehicles.</p>","PeriodicalId":56333,"journal":{"name":"Human Factors","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Factors","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00187208241226838","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study investigated the effects of nondriving-related task (NDRT) touchscreen location and NDRT difficulty level on the driver task performance, eye gaze behavior, and workload during SAE Level 3 conditionally automated driving. Two driver tasks were considered: a visuomanual NDRT and a take-over task.

Background: Touchscreens are expected to play important roles inside automated vehicles. However, few studies have investigated the driver-touchscreen interaction during automated driving.

Method: A driving simulator experiment was conducted. The experimental task consisted of two successive subtasks: an NDRT followed by a take-over task. NDRT touchscreen location (Upper Left, Upper Right, and Lower Right) and NDRT difficulty level (Easy and Hard) were the independent variables. A set of driver task performance, eye gaze behavior, and perceived workload measures were employed for each subtask as the dependent variables.

Results: NDRT touchscreen location significantly affected both the NDRT and the take-over task performance. Lower Right was superior to Upper Right in the NDRT performance but was inferior in the take-over task performance. NDRT touchscreen location affected the perceived physical workload of the NDRT. NDRT difficulty level affected the perceived workload of the take-over task.

Conclusion: The research findings enhance our understanding of how NDRT touchscreen location and NDRT difficulty level impact the driver task performance during conditionally automated driving, and, further provide useful design implications and knowledge.

Application: The study results would inform the NDRT touchscreen interface design and the NDRT design for conditionally automated vehicles.

车载触摸屏位置对有条件自动驾驶期间驾驶员任务表现、眼球注视行为和工作量的影响:与驾驶无关的任务和接管。
研究目的本研究调查了非驾驶相关任务(NDRT)触摸屏位置和 NDRT 难度对驾驶员在 SAE 3 级有条件自动驾驶过程中的任务表现、眼睛注视行为和工作量的影响。研究考虑了两项驾驶员任务:视觉视觉NDRT和接管任务:背景:触摸屏有望在自动驾驶汽车中发挥重要作用。背景:触摸屏有望在自动驾驶汽车中发挥重要作用。然而,很少有研究调查自动驾驶过程中驾驶员与触摸屏之间的交互:方法:进行了驾驶模拟器实验。实验任务包括两个连续的子任务:NDRT 和接管任务。NDRT触摸屏位置(左上方、右上方和右下方)和NDRT难度级别(简单和困难)是自变量。在每个子任务中都采用了一套驾驶员任务表现、眼睛注视行为和感知工作量测量方法作为因变量:结果:NDRT触摸屏的位置对NDRT和接管任务的表现有明显影响。右下方的 NDRT 成绩优于右上方,但在接管任务中却不如右上方。NDRT 触摸屏的位置影响 NDRT 的感知物理工作量。NDRT难度水平影响接管任务的感知工作量:研究结果加深了我们对 NDRT 触摸屏位置和 NDRT 难度如何影响有条件自动驾驶期间驾驶员任务表现的理解,并进一步提供了有用的设计意义和知识:研究结果将为条件自动驾驶车辆的 NDRT 触摸屏界面设计和 NDRT 设计提供参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Human Factors
Human Factors 管理科学-行为科学
CiteScore
10.60
自引率
6.10%
发文量
99
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society publishes peer-reviewed scientific studies in human factors/ergonomics that present theoretical and practical advances concerning the relationship between people and technologies, tools, environments, and systems. Papers published in Human Factors leverage fundamental knowledge of human capabilities and limitations – and the basic understanding of cognitive, physical, behavioral, physiological, social, developmental, affective, and motivational aspects of human performance – to yield design principles; enhance training, selection, and communication; and ultimately improve human-system interfaces and sociotechnical systems that lead to safer and more effective outcomes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信