How do green intellectual and co-creational capitals drive artificial intelligence innovation and green innovation in start-ups?

IF 5 3区管理学 Q1 BUSINESS

European Journal of Innovation Management Pub Date : 2024-01-16 DOI:10.1108/ejim-09-2023-0791

Mohammed Almansour

{"title":"How do green intellectual and co-creational capitals drive artificial intelligence innovation and green innovation in start-ups?","authors":"Mohammed Almansour","doi":"10.1108/ejim-09-2023-0791","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\n<p>This research examines the relationship between the green version of intellectual capital (IC) (measured through green versions of human, structural and relational capitals (GHC, GSC and GRC)), co-creational capital (CC), green innovation (GI), technological innovation (TI) (measured through artificial intelligence) and start-up competitive advantage (SCA).</p>\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\n<p>An online questionnaire collected data from 275 participants. To test the hypotheses, the data were analyzed using SmartPLS.</p>\n<h3>Findings</h3>\n<p>The results confirmed the positive influence of GSC and CC on TI and GI, GRC with GI and that of GI and TI with SCA. The results also reveal that IC can influence innovation and describe how innovation can drive the competitive advantage (CA) of start-ups.</p>\n<h3>Research limitations/implications</h3>\n<p>This self-report study examines the associations by collecting data at one point in time, which results in methodological limitations regarding the generalization of the results. The second limitation is that the findings are limited to start-ups.</p>\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\n<p>This research work examined a model that combined three components of green IC, customer capital, two forms of innovation and CA. These associations have not been previously examined yet can provide useful insight into what drives green and TIs and how they further influence competitiveness. This study provides unique inferences that improve the value of the literature on IC and innovation, using start-ups as context.</p>","PeriodicalId":51462,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Innovation Management","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Innovation Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ejim-09-2023-0791","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

This research examines the relationship between the green version of intellectual capital (IC) (measured through green versions of human, structural and relational capitals (GHC, GSC and GRC)), co-creational capital (CC), green innovation (GI), technological innovation (TI) (measured through artificial intelligence) and start-up competitive advantage (SCA).

Design/methodology/approach

An online questionnaire collected data from 275 participants. To test the hypotheses, the data were analyzed using SmartPLS.

Findings

The results confirmed the positive influence of GSC and CC on TI and GI, GRC with GI and that of GI and TI with SCA. The results also reveal that IC can influence innovation and describe how innovation can drive the competitive advantage (CA) of start-ups.

Research limitations/implications

This self-report study examines the associations by collecting data at one point in time, which results in methodological limitations regarding the generalization of the results. The second limitation is that the findings are limited to start-ups.

Originality/value

This research work examined a model that combined three components of green IC, customer capital, two forms of innovation and CA. These associations have not been previously examined yet can provide useful insight into what drives green and TIs and how they further influence competitiveness. This study provides unique inferences that improve the value of the literature on IC and innovation, using start-ups as context.

查看原文本刊更多论文

绿色知识资本和共同娱乐资本如何推动初创企业的人工智能创新和绿色创新？

目的本研究探讨了绿色版智力资本（IC）（通过绿色版人力资本、结构资本和关系资本（GHC、GSC 和 GRC）衡量）、共同娱乐资本（CC）、绿色创新（GI）、技术创新（TI）（通过人工智能衡量）和初创企业竞争优势（SCA）之间的关系。结果结果表明，GSC 和 CC 对 TI 和 GI 有积极影响，GRC 对 GI 有积极影响，GI 和 TI 对 SCA 有积极影响。研究局限性/启示这项自我报告研究通过收集一个时间点的数据来研究相关性，因此在方法上存在局限性，不利于结果的推广。原创性/价值这项研究工作考察了一个将绿色集成电路的三个组成部分、客户资本、两种形式的创新和 CA 结合在一起的模型。这些关联以前从未研究过，但却能为了解绿色创新和技术创新的驱动因素以及它们如何进一步影响竞争力提供有用的见解。本研究以初创企业为背景，提供了独特的推论，提高了集成电路和创新文献的价值。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

European Journal of Innovation Management Multiple-

CiteScore

10.40

自引率

17.60%

发文量

107

期刊介绍： The subject of innovation is receiving increased interest both from companies because of their increased awareness of the impact of innovation in determining market success and also from the research community. Academics are increasingly beginning to place innovation as a priority area in their research agenda. This impetus has been partly fuelled by the Economic & Social Research Council (ESRC) who have designated innovation as one of nine research areas in their research initiative schemes.