Comparing Shallow Seagrass Versus Fringing Marsh Habitat Use by Nekton Juvenile Recruits with “Incomparable” Fishing Gear in the Northern Gulf of Mexico

IF 2.3 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Just Cebrian, Rebecca Gilpin, Juan Alberti, Laura West, Ryan Moody, Rachel McDonald, Yee Lau, Whitney Scheffel
{"title":"Comparing Shallow Seagrass Versus Fringing Marsh Habitat Use by Nekton Juvenile Recruits with “Incomparable” Fishing Gear in the Northern Gulf of Mexico","authors":"Just Cebrian, Rebecca Gilpin, Juan Alberti, Laura West, Ryan Moody, Rachel McDonald, Yee Lau, Whitney Scheffel","doi":"10.1007/s12237-024-01324-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Shallow coastal systems act as nursery habitat for many species of fish and macroinvertebrates. Juveniles of these species may show selective use of certain habitat types over others, but the degree of such selectivity is not well studied for many species. Analysis of habitat selectivity is often hindered by inherently different gear types used in the habitats examined, which may not allow for direct comparison between the habitats. Here, we carry out nekton catches in the fringing marsh, using fyke nets, and in the adjacent seagrass habitat, using trawls, in the northern Gulf of Mexico to assess the relative use of the two habitats by the juveniles of six widespread important species. To resolve issues of gear comparability between fyke nets and trawls, we develop a habitat use index <span>\\(({HUI}_{S})\\)</span>. The results reveal a consistent trend where, in relation to pinfish, speckled sea trout shows slightly higher (from 8.4 to 66.9 times); American silver perch and brown shrimp show moderately higher (from 2.3 to 369.4 times); and blue crab and white shrimp show greatly higher (from 90.6 to 2366.4 times) use of marsh over seagrass habitat. Thus, while similar in direction, differences in the use of marsh over seagrass habitat in relation to pinfish were more pronounced in some sites. We propose an index that can resolve issues of gear comparability and improve our understanding of coastal habitat selectivity by fish and macroinvertebrates.</p>","PeriodicalId":11921,"journal":{"name":"Estuaries and Coasts","volume":"66 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Estuaries and Coasts","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12237-024-01324-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Shallow coastal systems act as nursery habitat for many species of fish and macroinvertebrates. Juveniles of these species may show selective use of certain habitat types over others, but the degree of such selectivity is not well studied for many species. Analysis of habitat selectivity is often hindered by inherently different gear types used in the habitats examined, which may not allow for direct comparison between the habitats. Here, we carry out nekton catches in the fringing marsh, using fyke nets, and in the adjacent seagrass habitat, using trawls, in the northern Gulf of Mexico to assess the relative use of the two habitats by the juveniles of six widespread important species. To resolve issues of gear comparability between fyke nets and trawls, we develop a habitat use index \(({HUI}_{S})\). The results reveal a consistent trend where, in relation to pinfish, speckled sea trout shows slightly higher (from 8.4 to 66.9 times); American silver perch and brown shrimp show moderately higher (from 2.3 to 369.4 times); and blue crab and white shrimp show greatly higher (from 90.6 to 2366.4 times) use of marsh over seagrass habitat. Thus, while similar in direction, differences in the use of marsh over seagrass habitat in relation to pinfish were more pronounced in some sites. We propose an index that can resolve issues of gear comparability and improve our understanding of coastal habitat selectivity by fish and macroinvertebrates.

Abstract Image

比较墨西哥湾北部使用 "无与伦比 "渔具捕获的新生桡足类幼体对浅海海草和边缘沼泽生境的利用情况
浅海沿岸系统是许多鱼类和大型无脊椎动物的育苗生境。这些物种的幼体可能对某些生境类型有选择性的利用,但对许多物种来说,这种 选择性的程度还没有得到很好的研究。对栖息地选择性的分析通常会受到所研究栖息地使用的不同渔具类型的阻碍,这可能导致无法对不同栖息地进行直接比较。在本文中,我们在墨西哥湾北部的边缘沼泽(使用叉网)和邻近的海草栖息地(使用拖网)分别捕获了小型底栖生物,以评估六种广泛分布的重要物种的幼体对这两种栖息地的相对利用情况。为了解决刺网和拖网之间的渔具可比性问题,我们开发了一个生境利用指数(({HUI}_{S})\)。结果显示了一个一致的趋势,即相对于针鱼,斑点海鳟对沼泽生境的利用率略高(从 8.4 到 66.9 倍);美国银鲈和褐虾对沼泽生境的利用率略高(从 2.3 到 369.4 倍);蓝蟹和白虾对沼泽生境的利用率大大高于海草生境(从 90.6 到 2366.4 倍)。因此,虽然在方向上相似,但在某些地点,沼泽与海草栖息地的利用率差异更为明显。我们提出的指数可以解决渔具可比性的问题,并提高我们对鱼类和大型无脊椎动物沿岸生境选择性的认识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Estuaries and Coasts
Estuaries and Coasts 环境科学-海洋与淡水生物学
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
11.10%
发文量
107
审稿时长
12-24 weeks
期刊介绍: Estuaries and Coasts is the journal of the Coastal and Estuarine Research Federation (CERF). Begun in 1977 as Chesapeake Science, the journal has gradually expanded its scope and circulation. Today, the journal publishes scholarly manuscripts on estuarine and near coastal ecosystems at the interface between the land and the sea where there are tidal fluctuations or sea water is diluted by fresh water. The interface is broadly defined to include estuaries and nearshore coastal waters including lagoons, wetlands, tidal fresh water, shores and beaches, but not the continental shelf. The journal covers research on physical, chemical, geological or biological processes, as well as applications to management of estuaries and coasts. The journal publishes original research findings, reviews and perspectives, techniques, comments, and management applications. Estuaries and Coasts will consider properly carried out studies that present inconclusive findings or document a failed replication of previously published work. Submissions that are primarily descriptive, strongly place-based, or only report on development of models or new methods without detailing their applications fall outside the scope of the journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信