Effectiveness of Triton Irrigation Solution in Smear Layer Removal: An in-vitro Study.

IF 1.6 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
European Endodontic Journal Pub Date : 2024-03-08 Epub Date: 2024-01-12 DOI:10.14744/eej.2023.58070
Huda Wakas Oraim, Iman Mohammed Al-Zaka
{"title":"Effectiveness of Triton Irrigation Solution in Smear Layer Removal: An in-vitro Study.","authors":"Huda Wakas Oraim, Iman Mohammed Al-Zaka","doi":"10.14744/eej.2023.58070","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This in vitro study aimed to compare and evaluate the effectiveness of different irrigation solutions, including Triton, 0.5% Chitosan nanoparticles (CNP), and 17% ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA), on the smear layer removal of the root canal walls.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Forty extracted sound mandibular premolars were examined; the samples were decoronated to obtain a root length of 14 mm. Each sample was instrumented using ProTaper Next rotary file X4 (40/0.06). The samples were longitudinally sectioned and examined under a scanning electron microscope at 3000x magnification in the coronal, middle, and apical thirds using a four-level scoring system.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Triton demonstrated the lowest mean smear layer removal (p>0.05) compared to the other irrigation solutions at all the levels of the root canal. No significant differences were observed (p>0.05) at the coronal and middle levels of the root canal between the CNP and EDTA groups. CNP demonstrated significantly more smear layer removal at the apical level compared to EDTA.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Smear layer removal was least effective with Triton at all the levels of the root canal compared to the other irrigation solutions tested in this study. CNP demonstrated superior smear layer removal at the apical level compared to the other irrigation solutions.</p>","PeriodicalId":11860,"journal":{"name":"European Endodontic Journal","volume":" ","pages":"139 - 145"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10938358/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Endodontic Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14744/eej.2023.58070","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This in vitro study aimed to compare and evaluate the effectiveness of different irrigation solutions, including Triton, 0.5% Chitosan nanoparticles (CNP), and 17% ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA), on the smear layer removal of the root canal walls.

Methods: Forty extracted sound mandibular premolars were examined; the samples were decoronated to obtain a root length of 14 mm. Each sample was instrumented using ProTaper Next rotary file X4 (40/0.06). The samples were longitudinally sectioned and examined under a scanning electron microscope at 3000x magnification in the coronal, middle, and apical thirds using a four-level scoring system.

Results: Triton demonstrated the lowest mean smear layer removal (p>0.05) compared to the other irrigation solutions at all the levels of the root canal. No significant differences were observed (p>0.05) at the coronal and middle levels of the root canal between the CNP and EDTA groups. CNP demonstrated significantly more smear layer removal at the apical level compared to EDTA.

Conclusion: Smear layer removal was least effective with Triton at all the levels of the root canal compared to the other irrigation solutions tested in this study. CNP demonstrated superior smear layer removal at the apical level compared to the other irrigation solutions.

Triton 冲洗液去除涂片层的效果:体外研究
研究目的本体外研究旨在比较和评估不同冲洗液(包括 Triton、0.5% 壳聚糖纳米颗粒 (CNP) 和 17% 乙二胺四乙酸 (EDTA) )对去除根管壁涂抹层的效果:对 40 颗拔出的下颌声前磨牙进行了检查;对样本进行了装饰,以获得 14 毫米的根长。使用 ProTaper Next X4(40/0.06)旋转锉对每个样本进行器械加工。在扫描电子显微镜下以 3000 倍的放大率对样本的冠状、中间和根尖三部分进行纵向切片,并使用四级评分系统进行检查:在根管的各个层面,Triton 与其他冲洗液相比,平均涂抹层去除率最低(p>0.05)。在根管的冠状层和中间层,CNP 组和 EDTA 组之间没有观察到明显的差异(p>0.05)。与 EDTA 相比,CNP 在根尖层的涂抹层去除率明显更高:结论:与本研究中测试的其他冲洗液相比,Triton 冲洗液在根管各层次去除涂抹层的效果最差。与其他冲洗液相比,CNP 在根尖层的涂抹层去除效果更好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Endodontic Journal
European Endodontic Journal DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
5.60%
发文量
25
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信