The Long-Term Effect on Dry Eye of Posterior Approach Ptosis Surgery Vs. Upper Eyelid Blepharoplasty.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Current Eye Research Pub Date : 2024-05-01 Epub Date: 2024-01-15 DOI:10.1080/02713683.2024.2302546
Ofira Zloto, Idan Alcalay, Bar Klain, Guy Ben Simon
{"title":"The Long-Term Effect on Dry Eye of Posterior Approach Ptosis Surgery Vs. Upper Eyelid Blepharoplasty.","authors":"Ofira Zloto, Idan Alcalay, Bar Klain, Guy Ben Simon","doi":"10.1080/02713683.2024.2302546","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To examine the long-term effect of combined blepharoplasty and Müller muscle-conjunctival resection (MMCR) compared to an upper blepharoplasty procedure on dry eye syndrome.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a Prospective comparative case series. Two groups of patients participated in this study: the blepharoplasty group included adult patients that underwent blepharoplasty at least 3 years earlier and the ptosis group consisting of adult patients that underwent MMCR with blepharoplasty at least 3 years earlier. The parameters that were compared for all patients before the procedure, on postoperative day 90, and at the long-term follow-up were: Schirmer-test 2, tear break-up time (TBUT), fluorescein staining, and lissamine green (LG) staining.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The participants included 25 post-MMCR patients with a mean follow-up of 4.94 ± 0.64 years and 15 post-blepharoplasty patients with a mean follow-up of 4.22 ± 0.32 years. There was a significant increase in the postoperative LG and fluorescein staining scores compared to the preoperative scores in the ptosis group (<i>p</i> < .01 and <i>p</i> < .01, respectively) as well as a decrease in postoperative TBUT compared to the preoperative values (<i>p</i> = .044). Those parameters were not significant in the blepharoplasty group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients who underwent MMCR, but not those following upper blepharoplasty, showed signs of dry eye compared to the preoperative status after long-term follow-up. Dry eye signs should be examined before MMCR surgery, and patients should be aware of the high risk of developing dry eye and the need for long-term treatment. Surgeons should carefully consider performing MMCR for patients with severe dry eye.</p>","PeriodicalId":10782,"journal":{"name":"Current Eye Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Eye Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02713683.2024.2302546","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To examine the long-term effect of combined blepharoplasty and Müller muscle-conjunctival resection (MMCR) compared to an upper blepharoplasty procedure on dry eye syndrome.

Methods: This is a Prospective comparative case series. Two groups of patients participated in this study: the blepharoplasty group included adult patients that underwent blepharoplasty at least 3 years earlier and the ptosis group consisting of adult patients that underwent MMCR with blepharoplasty at least 3 years earlier. The parameters that were compared for all patients before the procedure, on postoperative day 90, and at the long-term follow-up were: Schirmer-test 2, tear break-up time (TBUT), fluorescein staining, and lissamine green (LG) staining.

Results: The participants included 25 post-MMCR patients with a mean follow-up of 4.94 ± 0.64 years and 15 post-blepharoplasty patients with a mean follow-up of 4.22 ± 0.32 years. There was a significant increase in the postoperative LG and fluorescein staining scores compared to the preoperative scores in the ptosis group (p < .01 and p < .01, respectively) as well as a decrease in postoperative TBUT compared to the preoperative values (p = .044). Those parameters were not significant in the blepharoplasty group.

Conclusions: Patients who underwent MMCR, but not those following upper blepharoplasty, showed signs of dry eye compared to the preoperative status after long-term follow-up. Dry eye signs should be examined before MMCR surgery, and patients should be aware of the high risk of developing dry eye and the need for long-term treatment. Surgeons should carefully consider performing MMCR for patients with severe dry eye.

后入路上睑下垂手术与上眼睑眼睑成形术对干眼症的长期影响。
目的:与上眼睑成形术相比,研究眼睑成形术和缪勒肌-结膜切除术(MMCR)对干眼症的长期影响:这是一项前瞻性对比病例系列研究。方法:这是一项前瞻性比较病例系列研究,有两组患者参与了这项研究:眼睑成形术组包括至少 3 年前接受过眼睑成形术的成年患者,而上睑下垂组则包括至少 3 年前接受过 MMCR 和眼睑成形术的成年患者。所有患者在术前、术后第 90 天和长期随访时的参数都进行了比较:施尔默试验 2、泪液破裂时间(TBUT)、荧光素染色和利沙敏绿(LG)染色:研究对象包括 25 名接受过 MMCR 治疗的患者(平均随访时间为 4.94 ± 0.64 年)和 15 名接受过眼睑成形术的患者(平均随访时间为 4.22 ± 0.32 年)。与术前相比,上睑下垂组的术后 LG 和荧光素染色评分明显增加(分别为 p < .01 和 p < .01),术后 TBUT 与术前相比也有所下降(p = .044)。结论:结论:与术前相比,接受 MMCR 的患者在长期随访后会出现干眼症状,而接受上睑成形术的患者则不会出现干眼症状。MMCR手术前应检查干眼症状,患者应意识到患干眼症的高风险和长期治疗的必要性。外科医生应慎重考虑为严重干眼症患者实施 MMCR 手术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Current Eye Research
Current Eye Research 医学-眼科学
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
163
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: The principal aim of Current Eye Research is to provide rapid publication of full papers, short communications and mini-reviews, all high quality. Current Eye Research publishes articles encompassing all the areas of eye research. Subject areas include the following: clinical research, anatomy, physiology, biophysics, biochemistry, pharmacology, developmental biology, microbiology and immunology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信