Taking Pragmatism Seriously Enough: Toward a Deeper Understanding of the British Debate over Pragmatism, ca. 1900–1910

IF 0.6 2区哲学 0 PHILOSOPHY

JOURNAL OF THE HISTORY OF IDEAS Pub Date : 2024-01-13 DOI:10.1353/jhi.2024.a917116

Ymko Braaksma

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract:

Classical pragmatism has often been branded as being primarily a new theory of truth. Using F.C.S. Schiller's response to an article written by F.H. Bradley, I show that, in fact, a certain theory of thought is the essential point of pragmatism according to Schiller as well as John Dewey and William James. I go on to argue that without taking this theory of thought into account we cannot properly understand the British reception of classical pragmatism in the early 1900s. I illustrate the significance of this contention by criticizing the responses to pragmatism given by Bertrand Russell and G.E. Moore.

查看原文本刊更多论文

认真对待实用主义：深入理解英国关于实用主义的争论，约 1900-1910 年

摘要：古典实用主义常常被打上主要是一种新的真理理论的烙印。通过F.C.S.席勒对F.H.布拉德利所写的一篇文章的回应，我表明，事实上，根据席勒以及约翰-杜威和威廉-詹姆斯的观点，某种思想理论是实用主义的基本要点。我接着论证说，如果不考虑这一思想理论，我们就无法正确理解英国在 20 世纪初对古典实用主义的接受。我通过批评伯特兰-罗素和 G.E. 摩尔对实用主义的回应来说明这一论点的重要性。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

JOURNAL OF THE HISTORY OF IDEAS PHILOSOPHY-

CiteScore

0.70

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Since its inception in 1940, the Journal of the History of Ideas has served as a medium for the publication of research in intellectual history that is of common interest to scholars and students in a wide range of fields. It is committed to encouraging diversity in regional coverage, chronological range, and methodological approaches. JHI defines intellectual history expansively and ecumenically, including the histories of philosophy, of literature and the arts, of the natural and social sciences, of religion, and of political thought. It also encourages scholarship at the intersections of cultural and intellectual history — for example, the history of the book and of visual culture.