Bibliometric Analysis to Improve Combined Treatment Strategies for Glioblastoma in America

IF 0.4 Q4 ONCOLOGY
José Molina-García, David Vázquez, Ernesto Piñón, Alonso Portilla, M. Tena-Suck, Angel Lee, Carmen Rubio
{"title":"Bibliometric Analysis to Improve Combined Treatment Strategies for\nGlioblastoma in America","authors":"José Molina-García, David Vázquez, Ernesto Piñón, Alonso Portilla, M. Tena-Suck, Angel Lee, Carmen Rubio","doi":"10.2174/0115733947279948231213190721","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n\nBibliometric analysis quantitatively examines scientific literature to extract\ninsights. This article has conducted such analysis on glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) treatment articles. GBM, a prevalent brain tumor, is typically treated with surgery, radiation, and chemotherapy.\n\n\n\nThe article aimed to bibliometrically analyze articles discussing combined GBM treatment to identify impactful research areas and encourage collaboration.\n\n\n\nThe study encompassed a comprehensive search in the Scopus database,\nspanning articles published from 1974 to 2022. Inclusion criteria encompassed research conducted in\nthe Americas, both clinical and experimental. A total of 772 articles were collected and categorized\nbased on their primary focus on combined treatment approaches.\n\n\n\nClinical studies constituted 52% of articles, suggesting a slight dominance. The analysis unveiled key research moments, including a 1998 focus shift and a pivotal 2005 study on temozolomide-radiation combination. Top journals, trends, and authors were identified, with the USA\nleading in contributions.\n\n\n\nDespite high brain tumor incidence, research distribution discrepancy is concerning.\nRegional epidemiological studies have been endorsed. The dominance of US and German authors in\nGBM collaboration has raised equity issues due to budget and GDP disparities limiting Latin American representation.\n\n\n\nGBM research in the region is dominated by the USA, while contributions from Latin\nAmerican countries remain limited. The absence of comprehensive epidemiological studies on GBM\nin Latin America is concerning, considering the evident impact of the disease in the region. This underscores the urgent need for increased research participation and collaboration to advance the understanding and treatment of GBM across Latin American nations.\n","PeriodicalId":43754,"journal":{"name":"Current Cancer Therapy Reviews","volume":"30 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Cancer Therapy Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/0115733947279948231213190721","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Bibliometric analysis quantitatively examines scientific literature to extract insights. This article has conducted such analysis on glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) treatment articles. GBM, a prevalent brain tumor, is typically treated with surgery, radiation, and chemotherapy. The article aimed to bibliometrically analyze articles discussing combined GBM treatment to identify impactful research areas and encourage collaboration. The study encompassed a comprehensive search in the Scopus database, spanning articles published from 1974 to 2022. Inclusion criteria encompassed research conducted in the Americas, both clinical and experimental. A total of 772 articles were collected and categorized based on their primary focus on combined treatment approaches. Clinical studies constituted 52% of articles, suggesting a slight dominance. The analysis unveiled key research moments, including a 1998 focus shift and a pivotal 2005 study on temozolomide-radiation combination. Top journals, trends, and authors were identified, with the USA leading in contributions. Despite high brain tumor incidence, research distribution discrepancy is concerning. Regional epidemiological studies have been endorsed. The dominance of US and German authors in GBM collaboration has raised equity issues due to budget and GDP disparities limiting Latin American representation. GBM research in the region is dominated by the USA, while contributions from Latin American countries remain limited. The absence of comprehensive epidemiological studies on GBM in Latin America is concerning, considering the evident impact of the disease in the region. This underscores the urgent need for increased research participation and collaboration to advance the understanding and treatment of GBM across Latin American nations.
通过文献计量分析改进美国胶质母细胞瘤的综合治疗策略
文献计量学分析通过对科学文献进行定量研究来提取观点。本文对治疗多形性胶质母细胞瘤(GBM)的文章进行了此类分析。本文旨在对讨论多形性胶质母细胞瘤综合治疗的文章进行文献计量学分析,以确定有影响力的研究领域并鼓励合作。纳入标准包括在美洲进行的临床和实验研究。共收集到 772 篇文章,并根据其对综合治疗方法的主要关注点进行了分类。分析揭示了研究的关键时刻,包括 1998 年的重点转移和 2005 年关于替莫唑胺-放疗联合疗法的关键研究。尽管脑肿瘤发病率很高,但研究分布的差异令人担忧。由于预算和国内生产总值的差距限制了拉丁美洲的代表权,美国和德国作者在 GBM 合作中的主导地位引发了公平问题。考虑到该疾病对拉丁美洲的明显影响,拉丁美洲缺乏有关全球脑膜瘤的全面流行病学研究令人担忧。这突出表明,迫切需要加强研究参与和合作,以促进拉丁美洲各国对 GBM 的了解和治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
50
期刊介绍: Current Cancer Therapy Reviews publishes frontier reviews on all the latest advances in clinical oncology, cancer therapy and pharmacology. The journal"s aim is to publish the highest quality review articles dedicated to clinical research in the field. The journal is essential reading for all researchers and clinicians in cancer therapy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信