Clinician Perspectives on Risks and Benefits of Sharing Cardiovascular Implanted Electronic Device (CIED) Data with Patients

Brandon Tran, Carly Daley, Stephanie Pruitt, Jonathan Shirazi, Tina Allmandinger, Tammy R Toscos, Michael Mirro
{"title":"Clinician Perspectives on Risks and Benefits of Sharing Cardiovascular Implanted Electronic Device (CIED) Data with Patients","authors":"Brandon Tran, Carly Daley, Stephanie Pruitt, Jonathan Shirazi, Tina Allmandinger, Tammy R Toscos, Michael Mirro","doi":"10.18060/27805","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background and Objective: Cardiovascular implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) are critical, life-saving devices that are essential for the clinical decision-making process due to the data they collect. Because not all patients have ready access to their device data, there may be a clinical care gap where the CIED data are not being used most effectively in the care of patients with CIEDs. However, sharing CIED data may risk harming clinician-patient relationships and necessitates further study into clinician’s perspectives on CIED data sharing. The objective of this study was to explore clinicians’ perspectives on sharing CIED data with their patients and explore the perceived benefits and concerns. \nMethods: Clinicians involved in CIED care in the United States were recruited for semi-structured phone interviews. Participants were asked questions regarding their experiences and perspectives in sharing CIED data, and were presented scenarios to assess how they would leverage the CIED data in particular situations. Responses from the participants were analyzed by one researcher using thematic analysis. \nResults: Of the 28 clinicians interviewed in this study, the majority were white (85.7%) and located in the midwestern United States (67.9%). Participants included cardiac device clinic nurses and electrophysiology nurses (28.6%), electrophysiologists (25%), electrophysiology advanced practice providers (APPs) (17.9%), cardiologists (14.3%), and cardiology APPs (14.3%). The following themes were identified: (1) Patient engagement with healthcare, (2) Patient selfadvocacy, (3) Patients cannot interpret CIED data, (4) One size does not fit all. \nConclusion and Potential Impact: Clinicians perceived both potential benefits and harms from CIED data sharing. Clinicians noted that CIED data sharing has the potential to increase patient participation in their healthcare, but it also can cause increased patient anxiety due to insufficient patient education. This study demonstrated some of the ways CIED data sharing may affect clinical practice involving CIEDs and the challenge of sharing complex data elements with patients.","PeriodicalId":20522,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of IMPRS","volume":"6 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of IMPRS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18060/27805","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and Objective: Cardiovascular implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) are critical, life-saving devices that are essential for the clinical decision-making process due to the data they collect. Because not all patients have ready access to their device data, there may be a clinical care gap where the CIED data are not being used most effectively in the care of patients with CIEDs. However, sharing CIED data may risk harming clinician-patient relationships and necessitates further study into clinician’s perspectives on CIED data sharing. The objective of this study was to explore clinicians’ perspectives on sharing CIED data with their patients and explore the perceived benefits and concerns. Methods: Clinicians involved in CIED care in the United States were recruited for semi-structured phone interviews. Participants were asked questions regarding their experiences and perspectives in sharing CIED data, and were presented scenarios to assess how they would leverage the CIED data in particular situations. Responses from the participants were analyzed by one researcher using thematic analysis. Results: Of the 28 clinicians interviewed in this study, the majority were white (85.7%) and located in the midwestern United States (67.9%). Participants included cardiac device clinic nurses and electrophysiology nurses (28.6%), electrophysiologists (25%), electrophysiology advanced practice providers (APPs) (17.9%), cardiologists (14.3%), and cardiology APPs (14.3%). The following themes were identified: (1) Patient engagement with healthcare, (2) Patient selfadvocacy, (3) Patients cannot interpret CIED data, (4) One size does not fit all. Conclusion and Potential Impact: Clinicians perceived both potential benefits and harms from CIED data sharing. Clinicians noted that CIED data sharing has the potential to increase patient participation in their healthcare, but it also can cause increased patient anxiety due to insufficient patient education. This study demonstrated some of the ways CIED data sharing may affect clinical practice involving CIEDs and the challenge of sharing complex data elements with patients.
临床医生对与患者共享心血管植入式电子设备 (CIED) 数据的风险和益处的看法
背景与目的:心血管植入式电子设备(CIED)是关键的救生设备,其收集的数据对临床决策过程至关重要。由于并非所有患者都能随时访问其设备数据,因此可能存在临床护理缺口,即 CIED 数据未能最有效地用于 CIED 患者的护理。然而,共享CIED数据可能会损害临床医生与患者之间的关系,因此有必要进一步研究临床医生对共享CIED数据的看法。本研究的目的是探讨临床医生对与患者共享CIED数据的看法,并探究其感知到的益处和顾虑。研究方法研究人员招募了美国参与 CIED 治疗的临床医生进行半结构化电话访谈。访问者被问及有关他们共享CIED数据的经验和观点的问题,并通过情景模拟来评估他们在特定情况下如何利用CIED数据。一名研究人员使用主题分析法对参与者的回答进行了分析。结果:在本研究采访的28名临床医生中,大多数为白人(85.7%),居住在美国中西部(67.9%)。参与者包括心脏设备诊所护士和电生理学护士(28.6%)、电生理学家(25%)、电生理学高级实践提供者(APPs)(17.9%)、心脏病学家(14.3%)和心脏病学 APPs(14.3%)。确定了以下主题:(1)患者参与医疗保健;(2)患者自我主张;(3)患者无法解释 CIED 数据;(4)一刀切。结论和潜在影响:临床医生认为CIED数据共享既有潜在的益处,也有潜在的害处。临床医生指出,CIED数据共享有可能提高患者对医疗保健的参与度,但也可能因患者教育不足而增加患者焦虑。本研究展示了CIED数据共享可能影响涉及CIED的临床实践的一些方式,以及与患者共享复杂数据元素所面临的挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信