Assessment of soil moisture stress induced variability in oil content and composition in mint species

IF 1.4 4区 生物学 Q4 BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
Dipender Kumar , Arjita Punetha , Amir Khan , Priyanka Suryavanshi , Yogendra N.D. , R.C. Padalia
{"title":"Assessment of soil moisture stress induced variability in oil content and composition in mint species","authors":"Dipender Kumar ,&nbsp;Arjita Punetha ,&nbsp;Amir Khan ,&nbsp;Priyanka Suryavanshi ,&nbsp;Yogendra N.D. ,&nbsp;R.C. Padalia","doi":"10.1016/j.bse.2023.104774","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span>In the delicate balance of plant vitality, moisture-stress emerges as a critical determinant. Its stifling impact on stomatal regulation and photosynthesis<span><span> underscores its role in shaping agronomic outcomes and essential oil production. Addressing this challenge is imperative. Hence, the present investigation intended to find out the consequence of soil moisture on essential-oils content, and composition of three mint varieties. Experiment was setup with nine treatments from which the samples were collected at different times i.e., before and after irrigation. The study revealed noticeable variations in oil content across all species of mint family under increasing soil </span>moisture stress. For instance, in </span></span><em>M. spicata</em> L., the oil content found between 0.37% and 0.57%, while in <em>M. piperita</em> L., it varied from 0.50% to 0.62%, and in <em>M. citrata</em> L., it spanned from 0.43% to 0.62% during the morning and afternoon measurements. The predominant compound in <em>M. spicata</em><span> L. was piperitone oxide (43.04%–80.94%), while </span><em>M. piperita</em><span> L. exhibited higher concentrations of menthol (31.30%–46.80%) and menthone (10.63%–26.48%). In contrast, </span><em>M. citrata</em><span> L. stood out as a notable source of linalool (0.0%–58.27%). These findings collectively indicate that variations in soil moisture-stress significantly impact both the quantity and composition of oils in these species.</span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":8799,"journal":{"name":"Biochemical Systematics and Ecology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biochemical Systematics and Ecology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305197823001916","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the delicate balance of plant vitality, moisture-stress emerges as a critical determinant. Its stifling impact on stomatal regulation and photosynthesis underscores its role in shaping agronomic outcomes and essential oil production. Addressing this challenge is imperative. Hence, the present investigation intended to find out the consequence of soil moisture on essential-oils content, and composition of three mint varieties. Experiment was setup with nine treatments from which the samples were collected at different times i.e., before and after irrigation. The study revealed noticeable variations in oil content across all species of mint family under increasing soil moisture stress. For instance, in M. spicata L., the oil content found between 0.37% and 0.57%, while in M. piperita L., it varied from 0.50% to 0.62%, and in M. citrata L., it spanned from 0.43% to 0.62% during the morning and afternoon measurements. The predominant compound in M. spicata L. was piperitone oxide (43.04%–80.94%), while M. piperita L. exhibited higher concentrations of menthol (31.30%–46.80%) and menthone (10.63%–26.48%). In contrast, M. citrata L. stood out as a notable source of linalool (0.0%–58.27%). These findings collectively indicate that variations in soil moisture-stress significantly impact both the quantity and composition of oils in these species.

评估土壤水分胁迫引起的薄荷油含量和成分变化
在植物生命力的微妙平衡中,水分胁迫是一个关键的决定因素。它对气孔调节和光合作用的抑制作用突出表明了它在影响农艺结果和精油产量方面的作用。应对这一挑战势在必行。因此,本研究旨在找出土壤湿度对三个薄荷品种的精油含量和成分的影响。实验设置了九个处理,在灌溉前和灌溉后的不同时间采集样本。研究发现,在土壤水分压力增加的情况下,薄荷家族所有品种的油含量都有明显变化。例如,在 M. spicata L.中,油含量在 0.37% 到 0.57% 之间;在 M. piperita L.中,油含量在 0.50% 到 0.62% 之间;在 M. citrata L.中,上午和下午的油含量在 0.43% 到 0.62% 之间。M. spicata L. 的主要化合物是氧化胡椒酮(43.04%-80.94%),而 M. piperita L. 的薄荷醇(31.30%-46.80%)和薄荷酮(10.63%-26.48%)浓度较高。相比之下,M. citrata L. 是芳樟醇(0.0%-58.27%)的显著来源。这些发现共同表明,土壤水分压力的变化对这些物种中油的数量和成分都有显著影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Biochemical Systematics and Ecology
Biochemical Systematics and Ecology 生物-进化生物学
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
12.50%
发文量
147
审稿时长
43 days
期刊介绍: Biochemical Systematics and Ecology is devoted to the publication of original papers and reviews, both submitted and invited, in two subject areas: I) the application of biochemistry to problems relating to systematic biology of organisms (biochemical systematics); II) the role of biochemistry in interactions between organisms or between an organism and its environment (biochemical ecology). In the Biochemical Systematics subject area, comparative studies of the distribution of (secondary) metabolites within a wider taxon (e.g. genus or family) are welcome. Comparative studies, encompassing multiple accessions of each of the taxa within their distribution are particularly encouraged. Welcome are also studies combining classical chemosystematic studies (such as comparative HPLC-MS or GC-MS investigations) with (macro-) molecular phylogenetic studies. Studies that involve the comparative use of compounds to help differentiate among species such as adulterants or substitutes that illustrate the applied use of chemosystematics are welcome. In contrast, studies solely employing macromolecular phylogenetic techniques (gene sequences, RAPD studies etc.) will be considered out of scope. Discouraged are manuscripts that report known or new compounds from a single source taxon without addressing a systematic hypothesis. Also considered out of scope are studies using outdated and hard to reproduce macromolecular techniques such as RAPDs in combination with standard chemosystematic techniques such as GC-FID and GC-MS.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信