How simulated patients contribute to student learning in an authentic way, an interview study.

IF 2.8 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Annelies Lovink, Marleen Groenier, Anneke van der Niet, Heleen Miedema, Jan-Joost Rethans
{"title":"How simulated patients contribute to student learning in an authentic way, an interview study.","authors":"Annelies Lovink, Marleen Groenier, Anneke van der Niet, Heleen Miedema, Jan-Joost Rethans","doi":"10.1186/s41077-023-00277-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Simulated patients (SPs) play an instrumental role in teaching communication skills and enhancing learning outcomes. Prior research mostly focused on the SP's contribution to students' learning outcomes by providing feedback afterwards. A detailed understanding of the contribution of the SP during SP-student encounters is currently lacking although the majority of the interaction between SPs and students occurs during the SP-student encounter. Therefore, this study focuses on how SPs see their contribution to meaningful student learning experiences during SP-student encounters.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We interviewed fifteen simulated patients from one institution. We explored their perspectives on meaningful learning experiences during SP-student encounters through in-depth, semi-structured interviews and analyzed using thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>SPs view their contribution to meaningful student learning during SP-student encounters from two perspectives. A collective perspective as a member of the community of SPs and an individual perspective. From the collective perspective, SPs believe that the fact that students deal with multiple varied SP-student encounters over time is of value for meaningful learning. From the individual perspective, we noticed that SPs think, act, and react from three different positions. First, as the patient in the role description, second, as a teaching aid and third, as an individual with personal experiences, beliefs, and values. SPs mentioned that the ratio between these different positions can vary within and between encounters.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>According to SPs, we should value the variation between SPs, thereby creating meaningful variation in authentic interactions in SP-student encounters. SPs should be allowed to act and react from different positions during SP-student encounters, including their role description, as teaching aid, and based on their own experiences. In this way, SP-student encounters are optimized to contribute to meaningful student learning through authenticity.</p>","PeriodicalId":72108,"journal":{"name":"Advances in simulation (London, England)","volume":"9 1","pages":"4"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10782599/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in simulation (London, England)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41077-023-00277-w","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Simulated patients (SPs) play an instrumental role in teaching communication skills and enhancing learning outcomes. Prior research mostly focused on the SP's contribution to students' learning outcomes by providing feedback afterwards. A detailed understanding of the contribution of the SP during SP-student encounters is currently lacking although the majority of the interaction between SPs and students occurs during the SP-student encounter. Therefore, this study focuses on how SPs see their contribution to meaningful student learning experiences during SP-student encounters.

Methods: We interviewed fifteen simulated patients from one institution. We explored their perspectives on meaningful learning experiences during SP-student encounters through in-depth, semi-structured interviews and analyzed using thematic analysis.

Results: SPs view their contribution to meaningful student learning during SP-student encounters from two perspectives. A collective perspective as a member of the community of SPs and an individual perspective. From the collective perspective, SPs believe that the fact that students deal with multiple varied SP-student encounters over time is of value for meaningful learning. From the individual perspective, we noticed that SPs think, act, and react from three different positions. First, as the patient in the role description, second, as a teaching aid and third, as an individual with personal experiences, beliefs, and values. SPs mentioned that the ratio between these different positions can vary within and between encounters.

Conclusions: According to SPs, we should value the variation between SPs, thereby creating meaningful variation in authentic interactions in SP-student encounters. SPs should be allowed to act and react from different positions during SP-student encounters, including their role description, as teaching aid, and based on their own experiences. In this way, SP-student encounters are optimized to contribute to meaningful student learning through authenticity.

模拟病人如何以真实的方式促进学生学习,一项访谈研究。
简介模拟病人(SP)在传授沟通技巧和提高学习效果方面发挥着重要作用。之前的研究主要集中在模拟病人通过事后反馈对学生学习成果的贡献上。虽然模拟病人与学生之间的互动大多发生在模拟病人与学生接触的过程中,但目前还缺乏对模拟病人在模拟病人与学生接触过程中的贡献的详细了解。因此,本研究的重点是,在 SP 与学生的接触过程中,SP 如何看待自己对有意义的学生学习体验所做的贡献:我们采访了来自一所院校的 15 名模拟病人。我们通过深入的半结构式访谈,探讨了他们对 SP 学生接触期间有意义学习体验的看法,并使用主题分析法进行了分析:结果:医生从两个角度看待他们在医生-学生接触过程中对有意义的学生学习所做的贡献。作为 SP 社区成员的集体视角和个人视角。从集体的角度来看,专业教师认为,学生在一段时间内处理多种不同的专业教师-学生接触,对于有意义的学习是有价值的。从个人角度看,我们注意到 SPs 从三个不同的立场思考、行动和反应。第一,作为角色描述中的病人;第二,作为教具;第三,作为具有个人经历、信仰和价值观的个体。SPs 提到,这些不同立场之间的比例在不同的接触和不同的接触中会有所不同:根据 SPs 的观点,我们应该重视 SPs 之间的差异,从而在 SP 与学生的真实互动中创造有意义的差异。在 SP 与学生的接触中,应允许 SP 从不同的立场采取行动和做出反应,包括他们的角色描述、作为教学辅助工具以及基于他们自身的经验。这样,学生与 SP 的接触就能得到优化,从而通过真实性促进有意义的学生学习。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信