S.O.S. – Save our supplies: Understanding reasons to tackle the challenge of wasted returned blood products

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q4 HEMATOLOGY
Deep Madkaiker, Kartik Iyer, Jagriti, Deepika Chenna, Ganesh Mohan, Shamee Shastry
{"title":"S.O.S. – Save our supplies: Understanding reasons to tackle the challenge of wasted returned blood products","authors":"Deep Madkaiker,&nbsp;Kartik Iyer,&nbsp;Jagriti,&nbsp;Deepika Chenna,&nbsp;Ganesh Mohan,&nbsp;Shamee Shastry","doi":"10.1016/j.tracli.2024.01.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>To evaluate the return of blood components across different hospital areas, reasons for the same and suggest preventive strategies which might reduce out of controlled temperature storage (CTS) blood logistics and wastage.</p></div><div><h3>Material and methods</h3><p>A retrospective audit was carried out in the department of Transfusion Medicine from January 2019 to December 2022. Data related to returned blood components was compiled using departmental records and blood centre software entries.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 218 instances of returned components were noted and the total number of components returned were 442 (0.4% of all issued components) (38.4% (170) packed red blood cells, 16.2% (72) single donor cryoprecipitate concentrate, 19.6% (87) platelet concentrate and 25.5% (113) fresh frozen plasma). Components were returned back within 30 mins in only 27% (59/218) of all instances . Wards followed by high dependency units/intensive care units were noted to have the highest number of instances (86 (39.4%) and 69 (31.6%) respectively) with emergency department having the least,comprising 19 instances (8.7%). 77.9% (170/218) instances were observed for routine transfusion requests and 44.5% (97/218) of all instances could have been prevented by an appropriate clinical status assessment of the patient.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Stakeholders such as clinicians, transfusion laboratory professional and nursing staff must take consolidated efforts to eliminate wastage of blood components. Instances of returned blood components can be targeted by the hospital quality team as a quality improvement project.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":23262,"journal":{"name":"Transfusion Clinique et Biologique","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S124678202400003X/pdfft?md5=1c62cd7da2558fd663b25c43b54c68f6&pid=1-s2.0-S124678202400003X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transfusion Clinique et Biologique","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S124678202400003X","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

To evaluate the return of blood components across different hospital areas, reasons for the same and suggest preventive strategies which might reduce out of controlled temperature storage (CTS) blood logistics and wastage.

Material and methods

A retrospective audit was carried out in the department of Transfusion Medicine from January 2019 to December 2022. Data related to returned blood components was compiled using departmental records and blood centre software entries.

Results

A total of 218 instances of returned components were noted and the total number of components returned were 442 (0.4% of all issued components) (38.4% (170) packed red blood cells, 16.2% (72) single donor cryoprecipitate concentrate, 19.6% (87) platelet concentrate and 25.5% (113) fresh frozen plasma). Components were returned back within 30 mins in only 27% (59/218) of all instances . Wards followed by high dependency units/intensive care units were noted to have the highest number of instances (86 (39.4%) and 69 (31.6%) respectively) with emergency department having the least,comprising 19 instances (8.7%). 77.9% (170/218) instances were observed for routine transfusion requests and 44.5% (97/218) of all instances could have been prevented by an appropriate clinical status assessment of the patient.

Conclusion

Stakeholders such as clinicians, transfusion laboratory professional and nursing staff must take consolidated efforts to eliminate wastage of blood components. Instances of returned blood components can be targeted by the hospital quality team as a quality improvement project.

S.O.S. - 拯救我们的供应品:了解解决退回血液制品浪费难题的原因
目的评估不同医院区域血液成分的退回情况、退回原因,并提出预防策略,以减少受控温度储存(CTS)外的血液物流和浪费。结果共发现 218 例退回成分,退回成分总数为 442 个(占所有发放成分的 0.4%)(38.4%(170 个)包装红细胞、16.2%(72 个)单供体低温沉淀浓缩物、19.6%(87 个)血小板浓缩物和 25.5%(113 个)新鲜冷冻血浆)。只有 59 例(27%)在 30 分钟内送回成分。病房和高危病房/重症监护病房的返还次数最多(分别为 86 次(39.4%)和 69 次(31.6%)),急诊科最少,只有 19 次(8.7%)。77.9%(170/218)的案例发生在常规输血申请中,97/218(44.5%)的案例本可以通过对患者进行适当的临床状态评估来避免。医院质量小组可将退回血液成分的情况作为质量改进项目的目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
11.80%
发文量
234
审稿时长
36 days
期刊介绍: Transfusion Clinique et Biologique, the official journal of the French Society of Blood Transfusion (SFTS): - an aid to training, at a European level - the only French journal indexed in the hematology and immunology sections of Current Contents Transfusion Clinique et Biologique spans fundamental research and everyday practice, with articles coming from both sides. Articles, reviews, case reports, letters to the editor and editorials are published in 4 editions a year, in French or in English, covering all scientific and medical aspects of transfusion: immunology, hematology, infectious diseases, genetics, molecular biology, etc. And finally, a convivial cross-disciplinary section on training and information offers practical updates. Readership: "Transfusers" are many and various: anesthetists, biologists, hematologists, and blood-bank, ICU and mobile emergency specialists...
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信