A fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA) study on the formation mechanism of Internet platform companies’ social responsibility risks

IF 7.1 3区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS
Tongfang Lyu, Qitaisong Shen
{"title":"A fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA) study on the formation mechanism of Internet platform companies’ social responsibility risks","authors":"Tongfang Lyu, Qitaisong Shen","doi":"10.1007/s12525-023-00686-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In the realm of the digital economy, platform-based Internet companies leverage characteristics such as “cross-side effects” and “emerging technologies” to gain a competitive edge. However, simultaneously, they encounter challenges linked to inadequate risk management and insufficient focus on social responsibility. However, the discussions surrounding these matters have primarily been confined to case studies, lacking a comprehensive understanding of the underlying mechanisms that give rise to social responsibility risks. This research addresses this gap by establishing a database of corporate social responsibility risks for Internet platform companies and employs a qualitative comparative analysis method to dissect these social responsibility risks. The study unveils that Internet platform companies can navigate low social responsibility risks through three distinct pathways: the “resource-experience combining type,” the “long-term shareholder-orientation type,” and the “novel innovative advantage type.” It delves into the questions of what Internet platform companies should do and how they should approach corporate social responsibility in varying contexts. Furthermore, it identifies novel strategies within the domain of platform organizations and the platform economy, thus expanding the conceptual framework of corporate social responsibility driving mechanisms. This research offers valuable guidance for government policy development directed at fostering the sustainable growth of Internet platforms. Additionally, it provides platform companies with insights into optimizing their approaches to manage social responsibility risks in alignment with their unique characteristics. Ultimately, it serves as a robust theoretical guide and practical illustration for addressing these pivotal issues.</p>","PeriodicalId":47719,"journal":{"name":"Electronic Markets","volume":"18 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Electronic Markets","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-023-00686-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the realm of the digital economy, platform-based Internet companies leverage characteristics such as “cross-side effects” and “emerging technologies” to gain a competitive edge. However, simultaneously, they encounter challenges linked to inadequate risk management and insufficient focus on social responsibility. However, the discussions surrounding these matters have primarily been confined to case studies, lacking a comprehensive understanding of the underlying mechanisms that give rise to social responsibility risks. This research addresses this gap by establishing a database of corporate social responsibility risks for Internet platform companies and employs a qualitative comparative analysis method to dissect these social responsibility risks. The study unveils that Internet platform companies can navigate low social responsibility risks through three distinct pathways: the “resource-experience combining type,” the “long-term shareholder-orientation type,” and the “novel innovative advantage type.” It delves into the questions of what Internet platform companies should do and how they should approach corporate social responsibility in varying contexts. Furthermore, it identifies novel strategies within the domain of platform organizations and the platform economy, thus expanding the conceptual framework of corporate social responsibility driving mechanisms. This research offers valuable guidance for government policy development directed at fostering the sustainable growth of Internet platforms. Additionally, it provides platform companies with insights into optimizing their approaches to manage social responsibility risks in alignment with their unique characteristics. Ultimately, it serves as a robust theoretical guide and practical illustration for addressing these pivotal issues.

Abstract Image

互联网平台企业社会责任风险形成机制的模糊集定性比较分析(fsQCA)研究
在数字经济领域,以平台为基础的互联网公司利用 "交叉效应 "和 "新兴技术 "等特点赢得了竞争优势。但与此同时,它们也遇到了与风险管理不足和对社会责任关注不够有关的挑战。然而,围绕这些问题的讨论主要局限于案例研究,缺乏对引发社会责任风险的内在机制的全面了解。本研究针对这一空白,建立了互联网平台企业社会责任风险数据库,并采用定性比较分析方法对这些社会责任风险进行了剖析。研究揭示了互联网平台公司可以通过三种不同的途径来规避低社会责任风险:"资源经验结合型"、"长期股东导向型 "和 "新颖创新优势型"。报告深入探讨了互联网平台公司在不同情况下应该做什么以及如何履行企业社会责任的问题。此外,研究还发现了平台组织和平台经济领域的新战略,从而拓展了企业社会责任驱动机制的概念框架。这项研究为政府制定旨在促进互联网平台可持续发展的政策提供了宝贵的指导。此外,它还为平台公司提供了根据自身特点优化社会责任风险管理方法的见解。最终,它为解决这些关键问题提供了有力的理论指导和实践说明。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Electronic Markets
Electronic Markets Multiple-
CiteScore
14.80
自引率
15.30%
发文量
85
期刊介绍: Electronic Markets (EM) stands as a premier academic journal providing a dynamic platform for research into various forms of networked business. Recognizing the pivotal role of information and communication technology (ICT), EM delves into how ICT transforms the interactions between organizations and customers across diverse domains such as social networks, electronic commerce, supply chain management, and customer relationship management. Electronic markets, in essence, encompass the realms of networked business where multiple suppliers and customers engage in economic transactions within single or multiple tiers of economic value chains. This broad concept encompasses various forms, including allocation platforms with dynamic price discovery mechanisms, fostering atomistic relationships. Notable examples originate from financial markets (e.g., CBOT, XETRA) and energy markets (e.g., EEX, ICE). Join us in exploring the multifaceted landscape of electronic markets and their transformative impact on business interactions and dynamics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信