The Assessment of Volumetric Changes for Alveolar Ridge Preservation or Reconstruction by 3D Analysis at Posterior Extraction Sites with Severe Bone Defects Using DBBM-C Collagen Membrane and PRF: A Prospective and Randomized Clinical Trial.

Haina Yu, Qing Cai, Baosheng Li, Weiyan Meng
{"title":"The Assessment of Volumetric Changes for Alveolar Ridge Preservation or Reconstruction by 3D Analysis at Posterior Extraction Sites with Severe Bone Defects Using DBBM-C Collagen Membrane and PRF: A Prospective and Randomized Clinical Trial.","authors":"Haina Yu, Qing Cai, Baosheng Li, Weiyan Meng","doi":"10.11607/prd.6971","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Volumetric resorption of the alveolar ridge often occurs in both horizontal and vertical directions following tooth extraction. There is a specific lack of evidence for alveolar ridge reconstruction at molar and premolar sites with severe bone resorption. This randomized controlled trial used 3D and linear analyses to evaluate volumetric changes of the alveolar bone following alveolar ridge reconstruction (ARR) at molar and premolar sites with severe bone resorption as compared to unassisted socket healing before implant placement. A total of 31 patients (15 men, 16 women) with > 50% hard tissue loss in one or more socket walls were recruited and randomized into either a test group (postextraction ARR using deproteinized bovine bone mineral with 10% collagen [DBBM-C] and platelet-rich fibrin [PRF] with a resorbable collagen membrane) or a control group (natural healing after extraction). The clinical, linear, and volumetric implant-related and patient-reported outcomes were analyzed after 4 months of healing. Linear bone assessments revealed significantly greater ridge width gains in the test group (25% in the mesial, midfacial, and distal aspects) and less reduction of vertical bone ridge than in the control group (P < .05). Further, volumetric bone remodeling was significantly higher in the test group (35.1% ± 34.9% for ARR, 14.2% ± 12.8% for control; P < .05). Patient-reported discomfort and keratinized mucosal changes were comparable between groups. ARR with a combination of DBBM-C, PRF, and a resorbable membrane at posterior sites with a severe socket wall deficiency (> 50% bone loss) is a safe and more capable therapeutic method when compared to natural healing and unassisted sockets. Collectively, the present analyses demonstrate that ARR represents an efficient method to maintain and augment crestal bone at posterior extraction sites with severe bone defects when assessed after 4 months of healing.</p>","PeriodicalId":94231,"journal":{"name":"The International journal of periodontics & restorative dentistry","volume":"0 0","pages":"673-683"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The International journal of periodontics & restorative dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11607/prd.6971","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Volumetric resorption of the alveolar ridge often occurs in both horizontal and vertical directions following tooth extraction. There is a specific lack of evidence for alveolar ridge reconstruction at molar and premolar sites with severe bone resorption. This randomized controlled trial used 3D and linear analyses to evaluate volumetric changes of the alveolar bone following alveolar ridge reconstruction (ARR) at molar and premolar sites with severe bone resorption as compared to unassisted socket healing before implant placement. A total of 31 patients (15 men, 16 women) with > 50% hard tissue loss in one or more socket walls were recruited and randomized into either a test group (postextraction ARR using deproteinized bovine bone mineral with 10% collagen [DBBM-C] and platelet-rich fibrin [PRF] with a resorbable collagen membrane) or a control group (natural healing after extraction). The clinical, linear, and volumetric implant-related and patient-reported outcomes were analyzed after 4 months of healing. Linear bone assessments revealed significantly greater ridge width gains in the test group (25% in the mesial, midfacial, and distal aspects) and less reduction of vertical bone ridge than in the control group (P < .05). Further, volumetric bone remodeling was significantly higher in the test group (35.1% ± 34.9% for ARR, 14.2% ± 12.8% for control; P < .05). Patient-reported discomfort and keratinized mucosal changes were comparable between groups. ARR with a combination of DBBM-C, PRF, and a resorbable membrane at posterior sites with a severe socket wall deficiency (> 50% bone loss) is a safe and more capable therapeutic method when compared to natural healing and unassisted sockets. Collectively, the present analyses demonstrate that ARR represents an efficient method to maintain and augment crestal bone at posterior extraction sites with severe bone defects when assessed after 4 months of healing.

使用 DBBM-C 胶原膜和 PRF 在骨质严重缺损的后拔牙部位通过三维分析评估牙槽嵴保留或重建的容积变化:一项前瞻性随机临床试验。
问题陈述:拔牙后,牙槽嵴通常会在水平和垂直方向发生体积吸收。目的:这项随机对照试验旨在通过三维和线性分析,评估在牙槽骨吸收严重的磨牙和前磨牙部位进行牙槽嵴重建(ARR)后牙槽骨的体积变化,并与非辅助牙槽窝愈合和种植体植入进行比较:共招募了 31 位患者(男性 15 位,女性 16 位),他们的一个或多个牙槽窝壁硬组织缺损超过 50%,被随机分为试验组(拔牙后使用含 10%胶原蛋白的去蛋白牛骨矿物质(DBBM-C)和富血小板纤维蛋白(PRF)及可吸收胶原膜进行牙槽嵴重建)或对照组(拔牙后自然愈合)。然后,经过 4 个月的愈合过程,对临床、线性、体积种植相关结果和患者报告结果进行分析:结果:线性骨评估显示,与对照组相比,试验组的骨嵴宽度明显增加(中面部、中面部和远端各增加 25%),垂直骨嵴减少较少(P<0.05)。此外,试验组的骨体积重塑率明显更高(ARR=35.1±34.9%,对照组=14.2±12.8%,P<0.05)。患者报告的不适感和角化粘膜变化在两组之间具有可比性:结论:与自然愈合和非辅助牙槽相比,在牙槽骨壁严重缺损(骨量损失>50%)的后牙部位使用 DBBM-C、PRF 和可吸收膜组合进行牙槽嵴重建是一种安全且更有效的治疗方法:总之,我们的分析表明,牙槽嵴重建是一种有效的方法,可在骨质严重缺损的后牙拔牙部位维持和增加骨嵴,并在四个月后进行愈合评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信