Overlooked uneven progress across sustainable development goals at the global scale: Challenges and opportunities

IF 33.2 1区 综合性期刊 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
Yali Liu, Jianqing Du, Yanfen Wang, Xiaoyong Cui, Jichang Dong, Pan Gu, Yanbin Hao, Kai Xue, Hongbo Duan, Anquan Xia, Yi Hu, Zhi Dong, Bingfang Wu, Jürgen P. Kropp, Bojie Fu
{"title":"Overlooked uneven progress across sustainable development goals at the global scale: Challenges and opportunities","authors":"Yali Liu, Jianqing Du, Yanfen Wang, Xiaoyong Cui, Jichang Dong, Pan Gu, Yanbin Hao, Kai Xue, Hongbo Duan, Anquan Xia, Yi Hu, Zhi Dong, Bingfang Wu, Jürgen P. Kropp, Bojie Fu","doi":"10.1016/j.xinn.2024.100573","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Differences in progress across sustainable development goals (SDGs) are widespread globally; meanwhile, the rising call for prioritizing specific SDGs may exacerbate such gaps. Nevertheless, how these progress differences would influence global sustainable development has been long neglected. Here, we present the first quantitative assessment of SDGs’ progress differences globally by adopting the SDGs progress evenness index. Our results highlight that the uneven progress across SDGs has been a hindrance to sustainable development because: (1) it is strongly associated with many public health risks (e.g., air pollution), social inequalities (e.g., gender inequality, modern slavery, and wealth gap), and a reduction in life expectancy; (2) it is also associated with deforestation and habitat loss in terrestrial and marine ecosystems, increasing the challenges related to biodiversity conservation; (3) most countries with a low average SDGs performance show lower progress evenness, which further hinders their fulfillment of SDGs; (4) many countries with a high average SDGs performance also showcase stagnation or even retrogression in progress evenness, which is partly ascribed to the antagonism between climate actions and other goals. These findings highlight that while setting SDGs priorities might be more realistic under the constraints of multiple global stressors, caution must be exercised to avoid new problems from intensifying uneven progress across goals. Moreover, our study reveals that the urgent needs regarding SDGs of different regions seem complementary, emphasizing that regional collaborations (e.g., demand-oriented carbon trading between SDGs poorly-performed and well-performed countries) may promote sustainable development achievements at the global scale.</p>","PeriodicalId":36121,"journal":{"name":"The Innovation","volume":"214 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":33.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Innovation","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xinn.2024.100573","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Differences in progress across sustainable development goals (SDGs) are widespread globally; meanwhile, the rising call for prioritizing specific SDGs may exacerbate such gaps. Nevertheless, how these progress differences would influence global sustainable development has been long neglected. Here, we present the first quantitative assessment of SDGs’ progress differences globally by adopting the SDGs progress evenness index. Our results highlight that the uneven progress across SDGs has been a hindrance to sustainable development because: (1) it is strongly associated with many public health risks (e.g., air pollution), social inequalities (e.g., gender inequality, modern slavery, and wealth gap), and a reduction in life expectancy; (2) it is also associated with deforestation and habitat loss in terrestrial and marine ecosystems, increasing the challenges related to biodiversity conservation; (3) most countries with a low average SDGs performance show lower progress evenness, which further hinders their fulfillment of SDGs; (4) many countries with a high average SDGs performance also showcase stagnation or even retrogression in progress evenness, which is partly ascribed to the antagonism between climate actions and other goals. These findings highlight that while setting SDGs priorities might be more realistic under the constraints of multiple global stressors, caution must be exercised to avoid new problems from intensifying uneven progress across goals. Moreover, our study reveals that the urgent needs regarding SDGs of different regions seem complementary, emphasizing that regional collaborations (e.g., demand-oriented carbon trading between SDGs poorly-performed and well-performed countries) may promote sustainable development achievements at the global scale.

Abstract Image

被忽视的全球范围内可持续发展目标进展不均衡的问题:挑战与机遇
可持续发展目标(SDGs)之间的进展差异在全球范围内普遍存在;同时,要求优先实现特定可持续发展目标的呼声日益高涨,这可能会加剧这种差距。然而,这些进展差异将如何影响全球可持续发展却长期被忽视。在此,我们首次采用可持续发展目标进展均匀度指数对全球可持续发展目标的进展差异进行了定量评估。我们的研究结果表明,可持续发展目标的进展不均衡阻碍了可持续发展,因为:(1) 这种不均衡与许多公共健康风险(如空气污染)、社会不平等(如性别不平等、现代奴隶制、贫困)密切相关、(2) 它还与森林砍伐以及陆地和海洋生态系统栖息地的丧失密切相关,增加了与生物多样性保护相关的挑战;(3) 大多数可持续发展目标平均绩效较低的国家显示出较低的进展均衡性,这进一步阻碍了其可持续发展目标的实现;(4) 许多可持续发展目标平均绩效较高的国家也显示出进展均衡性的停滞甚至倒退,这部分归因于气候行动与其他目标之间的对立。这些发现突出表明,在多重全球压力的制约下,确定可持续发展目标的优先事项可能更加现实,但必须谨慎行事,以避免新问题加剧各目标之间的进展不平衡。此外,我们的研究表明,不同地区对可持续发展目标的迫切需求似乎是互补的,这强调了地区合作(例如,在可持续发展目标执行不力的国家和执行良好的国家之间开展以需求为导向的碳交易)可能会促进全球范围内的可持续发展成就。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
The Innovation
The Innovation MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES-
CiteScore
38.30
自引率
1.20%
发文量
134
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊介绍: The Innovation is an interdisciplinary journal that aims to promote scientific application. It publishes cutting-edge research and high-quality reviews in various scientific disciplines, including physics, chemistry, materials, nanotechnology, biology, translational medicine, geoscience, and engineering. The journal adheres to the peer review and publishing standards of Cell Press journals. The Innovation is committed to serving scientists and the public. It aims to publish significant advances promptly and provides a transparent exchange platform. The journal also strives to efficiently promote the translation from scientific discovery to technological achievements and rapidly disseminate scientific findings worldwide. Indexed in the following databases, The Innovation has visibility in Scopus, Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ), Web of Science, Emerging Sources Citation Index (ESCI), PubMed Central, Compendex (previously Ei index), INSPEC, and CABI A&I.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信