Yali Liu, Jianqing Du, Yanfen Wang, Xiaoyong Cui, Jichang Dong, Pan Gu, Yanbin Hao, Kai Xue, Hongbo Duan, Anquan Xia, Yi Hu, Zhi Dong, Bingfang Wu, Jürgen P. Kropp, Bojie Fu
{"title":"Overlooked uneven progress across sustainable development goals at the global scale: Challenges and opportunities","authors":"Yali Liu, Jianqing Du, Yanfen Wang, Xiaoyong Cui, Jichang Dong, Pan Gu, Yanbin Hao, Kai Xue, Hongbo Duan, Anquan Xia, Yi Hu, Zhi Dong, Bingfang Wu, Jürgen P. Kropp, Bojie Fu","doi":"10.1016/j.xinn.2024.100573","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Differences in progress across sustainable development goals (SDGs) are widespread globally; meanwhile, the rising call for prioritizing specific SDGs may exacerbate such gaps. Nevertheless, how these progress differences would influence global sustainable development has been long neglected. Here, we present the first quantitative assessment of SDGs’ progress differences globally by adopting the SDGs progress evenness index. Our results highlight that the uneven progress across SDGs has been a hindrance to sustainable development because: (1) it is strongly associated with many public health risks (e.g., air pollution), social inequalities (e.g., gender inequality, modern slavery, and wealth gap), and a reduction in life expectancy; (2) it is also associated with deforestation and habitat loss in terrestrial and marine ecosystems, increasing the challenges related to biodiversity conservation; (3) most countries with a low average SDGs performance show lower progress evenness, which further hinders their fulfillment of SDGs; (4) many countries with a high average SDGs performance also showcase stagnation or even retrogression in progress evenness, which is partly ascribed to the antagonism between climate actions and other goals. These findings highlight that while setting SDGs priorities might be more realistic under the constraints of multiple global stressors, caution must be exercised to avoid new problems from intensifying uneven progress across goals. Moreover, our study reveals that the urgent needs regarding SDGs of different regions seem complementary, emphasizing that regional collaborations (e.g., demand-oriented carbon trading between SDGs poorly-performed and well-performed countries) may promote sustainable development achievements at the global scale.</p>","PeriodicalId":36121,"journal":{"name":"The Innovation","volume":"214 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":33.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Innovation","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xinn.2024.100573","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Differences in progress across sustainable development goals (SDGs) are widespread globally; meanwhile, the rising call for prioritizing specific SDGs may exacerbate such gaps. Nevertheless, how these progress differences would influence global sustainable development has been long neglected. Here, we present the first quantitative assessment of SDGs’ progress differences globally by adopting the SDGs progress evenness index. Our results highlight that the uneven progress across SDGs has been a hindrance to sustainable development because: (1) it is strongly associated with many public health risks (e.g., air pollution), social inequalities (e.g., gender inequality, modern slavery, and wealth gap), and a reduction in life expectancy; (2) it is also associated with deforestation and habitat loss in terrestrial and marine ecosystems, increasing the challenges related to biodiversity conservation; (3) most countries with a low average SDGs performance show lower progress evenness, which further hinders their fulfillment of SDGs; (4) many countries with a high average SDGs performance also showcase stagnation or even retrogression in progress evenness, which is partly ascribed to the antagonism between climate actions and other goals. These findings highlight that while setting SDGs priorities might be more realistic under the constraints of multiple global stressors, caution must be exercised to avoid new problems from intensifying uneven progress across goals. Moreover, our study reveals that the urgent needs regarding SDGs of different regions seem complementary, emphasizing that regional collaborations (e.g., demand-oriented carbon trading between SDGs poorly-performed and well-performed countries) may promote sustainable development achievements at the global scale.
期刊介绍:
The Innovation is an interdisciplinary journal that aims to promote scientific application. It publishes cutting-edge research and high-quality reviews in various scientific disciplines, including physics, chemistry, materials, nanotechnology, biology, translational medicine, geoscience, and engineering. The journal adheres to the peer review and publishing standards of Cell Press journals.
The Innovation is committed to serving scientists and the public. It aims to publish significant advances promptly and provides a transparent exchange platform. The journal also strives to efficiently promote the translation from scientific discovery to technological achievements and rapidly disseminate scientific findings worldwide.
Indexed in the following databases, The Innovation has visibility in Scopus, Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ), Web of Science, Emerging Sources Citation Index (ESCI), PubMed Central, Compendex (previously Ei index), INSPEC, and CABI A&I.