The EU’s Interests in Afghanistan in Post-2021 Scenario: From Preferences to Operational Engagements

Dr. Muhammad Riaz Shad, Dr. Syed Sibtain Hussain Shah
{"title":"The EU’s Interests in Afghanistan in Post-2021 Scenario: From Preferences to Operational Engagements","authors":"Dr. Muhammad Riaz Shad, Dr. Syed Sibtain Hussain Shah","doi":"10.56384/jes.v40i1.331","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The European Union (EU) reshapes its position on Afghanistan in the post-US withdrawal scenario, witnessing Taliban re-entrance to the power corridors. By stopping all preferences immediately after the Taliban takeover in August 2021, the EU decided to continue only an operational engagement with the new Afghan administration which was necessary for logistical, operational, and humanitarian purposes. This research paper aims to investigate the EU’s responses towards Afghanistan, particularly in terms of its strategic engagement with Kabul, which intends to limit humanitarian assistance and other necessary activities in the war-torn country. A situation analysis of the empirical process was employed as a research technique to investigate the EU’s new stance over Afghanistan following the Taliban’s reemergence in the country. The study finds that human rights violations, ineffective rules of law, lack of social justice, and security issues led to the lack of interest of the international community including the EU in enhancing trade and economic cooperation with the country. The paper argues that to reopen doors to the international community including the EU, the Taliban regime needs to fulfil its international commitments concerning human rights and security issues.","PeriodicalId":199460,"journal":{"name":"Journal of European Studies (JES)","volume":"70 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of European Studies (JES)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56384/jes.v40i1.331","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The European Union (EU) reshapes its position on Afghanistan in the post-US withdrawal scenario, witnessing Taliban re-entrance to the power corridors. By stopping all preferences immediately after the Taliban takeover in August 2021, the EU decided to continue only an operational engagement with the new Afghan administration which was necessary for logistical, operational, and humanitarian purposes. This research paper aims to investigate the EU’s responses towards Afghanistan, particularly in terms of its strategic engagement with Kabul, which intends to limit humanitarian assistance and other necessary activities in the war-torn country. A situation analysis of the empirical process was employed as a research technique to investigate the EU’s new stance over Afghanistan following the Taliban’s reemergence in the country. The study finds that human rights violations, ineffective rules of law, lack of social justice, and security issues led to the lack of interest of the international community including the EU in enhancing trade and economic cooperation with the country. The paper argues that to reopen doors to the international community including the EU, the Taliban regime needs to fulfil its international commitments concerning human rights and security issues.
2021 年后欧盟在阿富汗的利益:从偏好到行动参与
美国撤军后,塔利班重新进入权力走廊,欧盟(EU)重新调整了对阿富汗的立场。2021 年 8 月塔利班接管阿富汗后,欧盟立即停止了所有优惠政策,决定只与阿富汗新政府继续保持业务往来,这对于后勤、业务和人道主义目的都是必要的。本研究论文旨在调查欧盟对阿富汗的反应,特别是在与喀布尔的战略接触方面,欧盟打算限制在这个饱受战争蹂躏的国家的人道主义援助和其他必要活动。本文采用了实证过程的情况分析作为研究方法,以调查塔利班在阿富汗重新崛起后欧盟对阿富汗的新立场。研究发现,侵犯人权、法治不力、缺乏社会公正以及安全问题导致包括欧盟在内的国际社会对加强与阿富汗的经贸合作缺乏兴趣。本文认为,为了重新向包括欧盟在内的国际社会敞开大门,塔利班政权需要履行其在人权和安全问题上的国际承诺。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信