AI risk assessment using ethical dimensions

Alessio Tartaro, Enrico Panai, Mariangela Zoe Cocchiaro
{"title":"AI risk assessment using ethical dimensions","authors":"Alessio Tartaro,&nbsp;Enrico Panai,&nbsp;Mariangela Zoe Cocchiaro","doi":"10.1007/s43681-023-00401-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In the design, development, and use of artificial intelligence systems, it is important to ensure that they are safe and trustworthy. This requires a systematic approach to identifying, analyzing, evaluating, mitigating, and monitoring risks throughout the entire lifecycle of an AI system. While standardized risk management processes are being developed, organizations may struggle to implement AI risk management effectively and efficiently due to various implementation gaps. This paper discusses the main gaps in AI risks management and describes a tool that can be used to support organizations in AI risk assessment. The tool consists of a structured process for identifying, analyzing, and evaluating risks in the context of specific AI applications and environments. The tool accounts for the multidimensionality and context-sensitivity of AI risks. It provides a visualization and quantification of AI risks and can inform strategies to mitigate and minimize those risks.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72137,"journal":{"name":"AI and ethics","volume":"4 1","pages":"105 - 112"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AI and ethics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s43681-023-00401-6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the design, development, and use of artificial intelligence systems, it is important to ensure that they are safe and trustworthy. This requires a systematic approach to identifying, analyzing, evaluating, mitigating, and monitoring risks throughout the entire lifecycle of an AI system. While standardized risk management processes are being developed, organizations may struggle to implement AI risk management effectively and efficiently due to various implementation gaps. This paper discusses the main gaps in AI risks management and describes a tool that can be used to support organizations in AI risk assessment. The tool consists of a structured process for identifying, analyzing, and evaluating risks in the context of specific AI applications and environments. The tool accounts for the multidimensionality and context-sensitivity of AI risks. It provides a visualization and quantification of AI risks and can inform strategies to mitigate and minimize those risks.

利用伦理维度进行人工智能风险评估
在设计、开发和使用人工智能系统时,确保其安全可靠非常重要。这就需要在人工智能系统的整个生命周期内,采用系统化的方法来识别、分析、评估、减轻和监控风险。虽然标准化的风险管理流程正在开发中,但由于各种实施差距,组织可能难以有效和高效地实施人工智能风险管理。本文讨论了人工智能风险管理的主要差距,并介绍了一种可用于支持企业进行人工智能风险评估的工具。该工具包括一个结构化流程,用于识别、分析和评估特定人工智能应用和环境中的风险。该工具考虑到了人工智能风险的多维性和背景敏感性。它提供了人工智能风险的可视化和量化,可为减轻和尽量减少这些风险的战略提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信