Factors Associated with Uptake of No-Cost Safety Modifications to Home Access Steps: Implications for Equity and Policy

Safety Pub Date : 2024-01-04 DOI:10.3390/safety10010007
M. Keall, N. Pierse, Chris W. Cunningham, Michael G. Baker, Sarah Bierre, P. Howden-Chapman
{"title":"Factors Associated with Uptake of No-Cost Safety Modifications to Home Access Steps: Implications for Equity and Policy","authors":"M. Keall, N. Pierse, Chris W. Cunningham, Michael G. Baker, Sarah Bierre, P. Howden-Chapman","doi":"10.3390/safety10010007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"(1) Background: Fall injuries in the home present a major health burden internationally for all age groups. One effective intervention to prevent falls is home modification, but safety is only increased if opportunities to install safety modifications are taken up. This study sought to identify factors that may lead to a higher uptake of no-cost home modifications when these are offered to people living in the community. (2) Methods: We studied 1283 houses in the New Zealand cities of New Plymouth and Wellington. Using logistic regression, we modelled the odds of uptake according to the number of access steps, the provider who was undertaking the modifications, occupant ethnicity, prior fall injury history, and age group. (3) Results: Homes with older residents (age 65+) had higher uptake rates (35% vs. 27% for other homes). Larger numbers of access steps were associated with higher uptake rates. There was indicative evidence that homes with Indigenous Māori occupants had a higher uptake of the modifications for one of the two providers, but not the other. (4) Conclusions: No-cost home safety modifications offered via cold calling are likely to have relatively low uptake rates but the households that do consent to the modifications may be those who are more likely to benefit from the concomitant increased safety.","PeriodicalId":509460,"journal":{"name":"Safety","volume":"93 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Safety","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/safety10010007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

(1) Background: Fall injuries in the home present a major health burden internationally for all age groups. One effective intervention to prevent falls is home modification, but safety is only increased if opportunities to install safety modifications are taken up. This study sought to identify factors that may lead to a higher uptake of no-cost home modifications when these are offered to people living in the community. (2) Methods: We studied 1283 houses in the New Zealand cities of New Plymouth and Wellington. Using logistic regression, we modelled the odds of uptake according to the number of access steps, the provider who was undertaking the modifications, occupant ethnicity, prior fall injury history, and age group. (3) Results: Homes with older residents (age 65+) had higher uptake rates (35% vs. 27% for other homes). Larger numbers of access steps were associated with higher uptake rates. There was indicative evidence that homes with Indigenous Māori occupants had a higher uptake of the modifications for one of the two providers, but not the other. (4) Conclusions: No-cost home safety modifications offered via cold calling are likely to have relatively low uptake rates but the households that do consent to the modifications may be those who are more likely to benefit from the concomitant increased safety.
与采用无成本安全改造家庭出入台阶相关的因素:对公平和政策的影响
(1) 背景:家庭中的跌倒伤害是国际上各年龄段人群的主要健康负担。预防跌倒的有效干预措施之一是进行家居改造,但只有抓住安装安全改造设施的机会,才能提高安全性。本研究试图找出在为社区居民提供无成本家居改造时,哪些因素可能导致更多的人接受这些改造。(2) 方法:我们对新西兰新普利茅斯市和惠灵顿市的 1283 所房屋进行了研究。利用逻辑回归法,我们根据出入台阶的数量、进行改装的提供商、居住者的种族、之前的跌倒受伤史和年龄组建立了接受改装的几率模型。(3) 结果:居住者年龄较大(65 岁以上)的家庭采用率较高(35%,其他家庭为 27%)。台阶数量越多,使用率越高。有迹象表明,有土著毛利人居住的家庭对两个提供商中的一个提供的改造方案的接受率较高,而对另一个提供的改造方案的接受率则不高。(4) 结论:通过冷启动电话提供的无成本家庭安全改造,其接受率可能相对较低,但同意改造的家庭可能更有可能从随之提高的安全性中受益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信