The Distinct Dispossessions of Indian Settler Colonialism in Kashmir: Land, Narrative and Indigeneity

IF 3 2区 社会学 Q1 DEVELOPMENT STUDIES
Haris Zargar, Goldie Osuri
{"title":"The Distinct Dispossessions of Indian Settler Colonialism in Kashmir: Land, Narrative and Indigeneity","authors":"Haris Zargar, Goldie Osuri","doi":"10.1111/dech.12809","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"India's annexation of Indian‐administered Jammu and Kashmir in August 2019 has generated debates within Critical Kashmir Studies regarding the kind of settler colonialism that is operating in this disputed Himalayan region. To illuminate the current relationship between land dispossession and narratives that legitimize land grab (for the settlement of Hindu Indian settlers), this article traces the logics and genesis of this ongoing settler project in Kashmir, going back to the historic Dogra feudal rule. The authors argue that the Hindu Dogra dispensation installed a revenue surveillance system that enabled it to engage in institutionalized land grab, and show how that extractive land administrative structure has been repurposed by the Indian state for its settler project. ​The article demonstrates how the Indian state engages in the (epistemic/discursive) erasure of local voices to ensure that the Kashmiri (Muslim) native is stripped of the position of indigeneity both over land and over the narrative of an expropriatory land grab. It further illustrates how the state strives to create facts on the ground to (re)define the ‘native’ and (re)claim the land for Indian Hindu settlers.","PeriodicalId":48194,"journal":{"name":"Development and Change","volume":"15 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Development and Change","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/dech.12809","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

India's annexation of Indian‐administered Jammu and Kashmir in August 2019 has generated debates within Critical Kashmir Studies regarding the kind of settler colonialism that is operating in this disputed Himalayan region. To illuminate the current relationship between land dispossession and narratives that legitimize land grab (for the settlement of Hindu Indian settlers), this article traces the logics and genesis of this ongoing settler project in Kashmir, going back to the historic Dogra feudal rule. The authors argue that the Hindu Dogra dispensation installed a revenue surveillance system that enabled it to engage in institutionalized land grab, and show how that extractive land administrative structure has been repurposed by the Indian state for its settler project. ​The article demonstrates how the Indian state engages in the (epistemic/discursive) erasure of local voices to ensure that the Kashmiri (Muslim) native is stripped of the position of indigeneity both over land and over the narrative of an expropriatory land grab. It further illustrates how the state strives to create facts on the ground to (re)define the ‘native’ and (re)claim the land for Indian Hindu settlers.
克什米尔印度殖民定居者的独特剥夺:土地、叙事和土著性
印度于 2019 年 8 月吞并了印控查谟和克什米尔地区,这在 "批判克什米尔研究 "中引发了关于在这一有争议的喜马拉雅地区运作的定居者殖民主义类型的辩论。为了阐明当前土地剥夺与(为印度教印度定居者定居的)土地掠夺合法化叙事之间的关系,本文追溯了克什米尔正在进行的定居者项目的逻辑和起源,追溯到历史上的多格拉封建统治。作者认为,印度教多格拉王朝建立的税收监控系统使其能够进行制度化的土地掠夺,并说明印度国家是如何将这种榨取性的土地管理结构重新用于其定居者项目的。文章展示了印度国家如何(在认识论/辨证法上)抹杀当地人的声音,以确保克什米尔(穆斯林)本地人在土地和征用土地叙事中被剥夺土著地位。它进一步说明了国家如何努力在当地制造事实,以(重新)定义 "本地人",并(重新)为印度印度教定居者要求土地。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Development and Change
Development and Change DEVELOPMENT STUDIES-
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
3.30%
发文量
46
期刊介绍: Development and Change is essential reading for anyone interested in development studies and social change. It publishes articles from a wide range of authors, both well-established specialists and young scholars, and is an important resource for: - social science faculties and research institutions - international development agencies and NGOs - graduate teachers and researchers - all those with a serious interest in the dynamics of development, from reflective activists to analytical practitioners
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信