Plasmodium falciparum remains the dominant parasite affecting children despite decades of implementing vector control in two villages of Wolaita Zone, Southwest Ethiopia

Shimels Elias, F. Massebo
{"title":"Plasmodium falciparum remains the dominant parasite affecting children despite decades of implementing vector control in two villages of Wolaita Zone, Southwest Ethiopia","authors":"Shimels Elias, F. Massebo","doi":"10.3389/fepid.2023.1305074","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Malaria is still a significant public health concern, and its prevention and control measures have different impacts in different areas. This study assesses the prevalence of malaria and the effectiveness of routine malaria control programmes such as indoor residual spray (IRS) in two Ethiopian villages.The Kebeles (villages) were purposefully selected based on their malaria prevalence rates. A parasitology survey was conducted in Fango-Gelchecha pre- and post-IRS implementation, whereas in Shochora-Abela it was only conducted post-IRS implementation. The IRS was implemented as part of the routine malaria control programme in August 2017. Every fourth house from the village registration list was systematically selected, resulting in a sample of 300 households per village. A total of 3,075 individuals were enrolled for malaria testing using microscopy.After three to four months of application of IRS in August 2017, 59 malaria cases were confirmed, resulting in an overall prevalence of 1.9% (95% CI: 1.5–2.5). Of the positive cases, 18 cases (0.59%: 95% CI: 1.3–1.8) were from Shochora-Abela village, and 41 cases (1.33%: 95% CI: 1.1–1.3) were from Fango-Gelchecha. About age categories, the prevalence of malaria was 10.1% (95% CI: 5.9–15.9) among children under five, 4.7% (95% CI: 3.3–6.4) in children aged 5–14, and only 0.32% (95% CI: 0.13–0.67) in the age group 15 and above. Overall, P. falciparum was the dominant malaria parasite, accounting for 69.5% (95% CI: 56.1–80.8), while P. vivax malaria accounted for 30.5% (95% CI: 19.2–43.8). The malaria prevalence in Fango-Gelchecha village was 3.1% (95% CI: 2.3–4.0) before IRS and 2.6% (95% CI: 1.8–3.5) after IRS application. In the village of Shochora-Abela, the prevalence of malaria post-IRS was 1.2% (95% CI: 0.7–1.9), but the prevalence prior to IRS was not evaluated.Plasmodium falciparum is the predominant parasite in the villages, mainly affecting children under five. Therefore, protecting young children should be the top priority for reducing infection burdens.","PeriodicalId":73083,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in epidemiology","volume":"13 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fepid.2023.1305074","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Malaria is still a significant public health concern, and its prevention and control measures have different impacts in different areas. This study assesses the prevalence of malaria and the effectiveness of routine malaria control programmes such as indoor residual spray (IRS) in two Ethiopian villages.The Kebeles (villages) were purposefully selected based on their malaria prevalence rates. A parasitology survey was conducted in Fango-Gelchecha pre- and post-IRS implementation, whereas in Shochora-Abela it was only conducted post-IRS implementation. The IRS was implemented as part of the routine malaria control programme in August 2017. Every fourth house from the village registration list was systematically selected, resulting in a sample of 300 households per village. A total of 3,075 individuals were enrolled for malaria testing using microscopy.After three to four months of application of IRS in August 2017, 59 malaria cases were confirmed, resulting in an overall prevalence of 1.9% (95% CI: 1.5–2.5). Of the positive cases, 18 cases (0.59%: 95% CI: 1.3–1.8) were from Shochora-Abela village, and 41 cases (1.33%: 95% CI: 1.1–1.3) were from Fango-Gelchecha. About age categories, the prevalence of malaria was 10.1% (95% CI: 5.9–15.9) among children under five, 4.7% (95% CI: 3.3–6.4) in children aged 5–14, and only 0.32% (95% CI: 0.13–0.67) in the age group 15 and above. Overall, P. falciparum was the dominant malaria parasite, accounting for 69.5% (95% CI: 56.1–80.8), while P. vivax malaria accounted for 30.5% (95% CI: 19.2–43.8). The malaria prevalence in Fango-Gelchecha village was 3.1% (95% CI: 2.3–4.0) before IRS and 2.6% (95% CI: 1.8–3.5) after IRS application. In the village of Shochora-Abela, the prevalence of malaria post-IRS was 1.2% (95% CI: 0.7–1.9), but the prevalence prior to IRS was not evaluated.Plasmodium falciparum is the predominant parasite in the villages, mainly affecting children under five. Therefore, protecting young children should be the top priority for reducing infection burdens.
尽管在埃塞俄比亚西南部沃莱塔区的两个村庄实施了几十年的病媒控制,恶性疟原虫仍然是影响儿童的主要寄生虫
疟疾仍然是一个重大的公共卫生问题,其预防和控制措施在不同地区有不同的影响。本研究评估了埃塞俄比亚两个村庄的疟疾流行情况以及室内滞留喷洒(IRS)等常规疟疾控制项目的效果。在 Fango-Gelchecha 实施室内滞留喷洒之前和之后进行了寄生虫学调查,而在 Shochora-Abela 仅在实施室内滞留喷洒之后进行了调查。IRS 于 2017 年 8 月作为常规疟疾控制计划的一部分实施。从村庄登记名单中系统地抽取了每四户人家,因此每个村庄的样本为 300 户。在 2017 年 8 月实施 IRS 三至四个月后,共确诊 59 例疟疾病例,总患病率为 1.9%(95% CI:1.5-2.5)。在阳性病例中,18 例(0.59%:95% CI:1.3-1.8)来自 Shochora-Abela 村,41 例(1.33%:95% CI:1.1-1.3)来自 Fango-Gelchecha。关于年龄组,5 岁以下儿童的疟疾发病率为 10.1%(95% CI:5.9-15.9),5-14 岁儿童为 4.7%(95% CI:3.3-6.4),15 岁及以上年龄组仅为 0.32%(95% CI:0.13-0.67)。总体而言,恶性疟原虫是主要的疟疾寄生虫,占 69.5%(95% CI:56.1-80.8),间日疟原虫占 30.5%(95% CI:19.2-43.8)。在实施 IRS 之前,Fango-Gelchecha 村的疟疾流行率为 3.1%(95% CI:2.3-4.0),实施 IRS 之后为 2.6%(95% CI:1.8-3.5)。在 Shochora-Abela 村,IRS 后的疟疾发病率为 1.2%(95% CI:0.7-1.9),但 IRS 前的发病率没有进行评估。因此,保护幼儿应成为降低感染负担的首要任务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信